Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Megan Fitzgerald

Megan Fitzgerald has started 2 posts and replied 5 times.

I wound up coming up with standardized language to put into the lease (which originally just said that service animals would be permitted according to law). I now require any animals brought onto the property for any length of time, even service and emotional support animals, to be registered with petscreening.com or otherwise verified through a third party, and if tenants or their guests are not happy with that, they can send the documentation directly to me (vaccination records for the animal and a doctor's note with medical license and clinician contact information be sent to me). Upon verification, I will then give them written permission to have that specific animal on the property. Petscreening.com seems a bit predatory, but it's sadly necessary to do this because people are trying to pass pets off as service animals. I also made it clear that he is responsible for any damages caused by the dog, and its status as a service/support animal does not exempt him from paying for property damage or cleaning fees for messes that are above the normal wear-and-tear. 

I also clarified my guest policy to the applicant, which is that guests may stay a total of 10 nights, and not more than 5 consecutive nights, if they are not on the lease (the lease is for 3.5 months). 

I emailed the applicant to give him a heads up about the language in the lease, in case he wanted to find a more dog-friendly property, but he wants to go ahead. I don't have a reason to turn him down, other than the dog, but if it is a real emotional support animal that would be discrimination, so we're proceeding. 

I've had such bad experiences in the past with dogs in a different fully furnished short term rental where we originally allowed dogs-- swimming in a decorative pond and disconnecting the filter, killing the koi, chewing up a couch and other soft furnishings, scratching a newly installed hardwood door and ruining the finish, digging giant holes in the yard and landscaping.... thousands of dollars of damage, really, in a very short time, which is why I have a strict no pets policy, and am particularly nervous about dogs on the property.

I have a strict no pets policy on my 3BR fully furnished mid term rental because it is nicely furnished and decorated with soft furnishings, linens, etc, has a carpeted, finished basement, and a tiny but fully landscaped backyard. Though I'm am animal lover, dogs and cats just have the capacity to do too much damage in a short time to this type of rental. I'd have to double the security deposit, raise the rent by 20%, and double the cleaning fee to even make it worth considering-- which I would if people were willing to pay but the market doesn't support those prices.

HOWEVER I currently have a single man who filled out his application and negotiated 10% lower rent with me. He mentioned his girlfriend would be staying with him occasionally before submitting the application, but she would not be in the lease. After submitting the application and credit check, he also informed me that his girlfriend would be bringing her "emotional support dog" with her during her stays?

Is there a way to say a hard no to that without running afoul of disability laws? Since she is not on the lease, I'm hopeful I can do so. 

How do you all handle emotional support animals? I was surprised that i couldn't even charge people who bring these sorts of pets an additional deep cleaning fee to remove allergens for future guests thinking they had access to a pet fee home.

And yes, the smaller bedroom is most appropriate for a nursery. Since we're renting furnished, I have a portable crib and daybed in that space. Great idea to advertise as a nursery going forward. 

Thanks so much for this response-- super helpful. Will clarify the occupancy limits in my advertisements going forward. 

I'm renting out a fully furnished renovated 3BR 1.5 bath townhouse in Philly, advertising on AirBNB and Furnished Finder. 

My first renter is a family with 4 kids. I'd stated the occupancy limit on the property is 4 adults and was a bit unprepared when he filled out the application with 6 total people (himself, wife, and 4 kids). But the laws seem OK with 6 as an upper limit for 3BRs so I went ahead with the rental. 

I'm OK with having a family with a few kids (6 people is pushing the limit, but a number of families on our block have 3 kids in the same size home and it's fine).  But I truly can't have 5-6 adults in the space-- it's only about 1100 sq ft. Adult roommates cohabitating on my block tend to live 2 per building and keep the third bedroom, which is small, as an office or guest room. 

I'm wondering how to advertise the space going forward. The space is most appropriate for a couple with 1-3 children, 3 single adults, or even a couple with a grandparent or nanny and a kid or 2.

From what I'm reading, the law protects families with kids from discrimination, but can I get in trouble for doing the reverse and allowing (and potentially advertising) a higher occupancy rate if people have babies and children than if all occupants are adults?