Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Marc Cohen

Marc Cohen has started 2 posts and replied 11 times.

Would this open the sponsor up to more scrutiny around money laundering? Every time I make a USD transfer I have to declare source of funds. Not the same if I send BTC so potentially could open up some legal issues and might be worth a sponsor safeguarding against that. 

I'm with @michael D in not seeing the benefit. I currently own both Bitcoin and invest in syndications but why combine them? 
As an example if entry is $100k to MF syndication then sponsor will ask for $100k in bitcoin value. I could just change it that day into USD. Likewise is sponsor wants to become a crypto investor they can use my $100k USD to buy bitcoin. The equation is the same. I am just not sure why you would link it to an MF asset. 

Personally I only see downside as if Bitcoin drops then could put pressure on reserves and overall funds but then likewise f it increases then surely the sponsor wants that benefit for themselves due to the risk they took in accepting?

Very interesting thread and great contributions. DD is real! 

@Ian Ippolito thanks will connect now 

I have had many opportunities with the bigger funds and the minimums have been fine. The challenge is the returns are lower - the trade off v less risk. 

@Ronald Rohde Thanks. I have had some opportunities with bigger players and great conservative option but unfortunately not the level of return. Market so high that eats their margin. 

I did just complete due diligence on a great opportunity with Praxis Multi Family Fund. Seem like a good outfit so looking forward to seeing how it goes. 

Now just looking for Industrial but like you say in this space not many mid market syndications or funds. 

@Petro B. I’m reading it now. Really like it so far and am in talks with Praxis. They seem legit. 

Ashcroft seem good but are only 5 years old so all their experience has been in this hot market. They have a huge number of deals in play so that also makes me hesitant. 

Will keep you posted 

Hi BP Members, 

I am in research mode on the best sponsors! Appreciate any help you can provide. 

Looking for a focus on MFH or Industrial with a sponsor that has a 15 year + track record. This is critical as I am seeing many syndicators who have set up and had success in the past 5 years but I'm looking for a sponsor that has those battle scars! 

It seems 8% preferred with an equity split on exit is achievable. 

I have spoken to a few companies recently and been put off by some who have been set up in the past 5 years, only made a few exits and yet currently have in excess of 30 syndications and looking to add more with business model that has aggressive underwriting . More power to them but I don't want to be the one holding at the end if there is a strong market adjustment.

Appreciate any insights or recommendations for quality sponsors to research. 

Thanks

Marc

Thanks Arn. I am looking at syndications now as an LP so would really appreciate any insights on sourcing the deals.
Will drop you a direct line

Originally posted by @Jon Schwartz:
Originally posted by @Marc Cohen:

So big wide world of real estate investing is giving me many ideas and options but I thought no better place than Bigger Pockets so get real insights.

Currently live in Los Angeles and have a SFH rented locally and a property in London (my hometown). The LA market is so hot but rare/unable to make more than 0.5% yield or exceed 4% cap rate.

I have gone back and forth on mfh v sfh, out of state, yield v appreciation etc... You all know the drill. I have cash deploy so the key element is to do it effectively as part of an overall strategy. 


Appreciate any advice or thoughts 

Marc,

I'd invest in LA if I were you!

LA and all of California gets dragged through the mud on BP. Midwesterners attack our low cap rates, but the reason our cap rates are so low is because our real estate is so desirable. Anybody here who has the capital to invest here does; everybody who doesn't have the capital to get into this market writes it off and blames the cap rates or rent control or liberal state legislature, etc.

Current yield matters in your typical Midwest market because there's no rent control and barriers to new construction are few. So most buildings are already generating market rents (and if not, they're the unicorn-like "value add" opportunity), and the game is to find good yield and ride it out until another part of town is more popular. Midwesterners probably wouldn't describe their investment strategy in such terms, but who are they kidding?

In LA, current yield is secondary to the future value of the building, not just in terms of natural appreciation but in terms of rental upside. It's not uncommon to find a building with rents 50% below market. Because of our low cap rates, when market rents are achieved, the building will be worth 2, 3, even 4 times what you paid.

New development is also very difficult in LA, and all of the buildable land has been built. These aren't bugs, these are features!

This is what you should do with your $1M:

Buy a commercial property in a gentrifying LA submarket. Metro LA has a population of 13M, more than the entire states of Arizona and Nevada combined. LA is not a market; it's 1000 different submarkets. I focus on identifying which submarkets demonstrate the most promise for rent growth and appreciation.

Next, hire a "cash for keys" negotiator. Yes, these people exist in Los Angeles. Your negotiator will be able to reach mutual agreements with some of your tenants to move out. Especially in COVID times, when many tenants are behind on rent and facing an eventual eviction, offering them money to move now might be exactly what they want. And LA's rent control ordinance regulates this negotiation, so it's actually impossible for you to take advantage of a tenant.

Next, renovate your vacated units and re-rent them at market rents. Your building will be significantly more valuable than when you bought it.

If you're aggressive, sell the building and 1031 into a new one. If you want to be less aggressive, refinance or open a HELOC to recoup some capital to put toward your next investment.

That's LA investing in a nutshell. Happy to discuss in more detail with you, too!

Best,

Jon

 Thanks Jon, really interesting to get an opinion on the local market as I do like the options near me long term but am swayed by the advice to go out of state. Will PM you

Originally posted by @Carmen Dettloff:

Hi Marc, 

It totally depends on your goals. I would stay out of investing in California! Between the population migration out of California plus the political climate being unfriendly to landlords, California isn't very appealing. 

Personally I'd invest for cash flow because appreciation is hopefully but not guaranteed. Additionally I would invest in MFR over SFR. You lower your risk level by increasing your unit number. And I would invest in several syndications (unless you have the time to manage something yourself) so you can spread out your investment over several cities and states. Then you are diverse in areas invested and lower your risk. You could even invest some in storage unit syndications to diversify as much as possible.

Good luck and happy investing! 
Carmen

 Thanks Carmen, agree on all your points. 

California is terrible for cash flow and the laws prohibitive. Are there any markets you do like for mfr cash flow?

I am interested in learning more about syndication opportunities. Any sites you can recommend or advice to gain access? I have checked out Cadre but interestingly most of their recent investments have declined in value so that puts me off. Do you have any concerns on exit strategy with a syndication? My fear is the lack of control. I do like the storage sectors (doesn't everyone) so will continue to keep an eye out. 

Appreciated!