Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Makan A Tabrizi

Makan A Tabrizi has started 9 posts and replied 43 times.

Post: Checking for Evictions

Makan A TabriziPosted
  • Posts 43
  • Votes 20

Thank you, yes, I'm finding that simply asking what their credit score is weeding a lot of people out. Whoever actually applies I will be sure to scrutinize through the credit report.

Post: Checking for Evictions

Makan A TabriziPosted
  • Posts 43
  • Votes 20

Thank you, Kevin. Yes, I'm planning to do that. 

Post: Checking for Evictions

Makan A TabriziPosted
  • Posts 43
  • Votes 20

Being a landlord in Colorado is getting more challenging with all the new laws getting passed. I'm a new landlord, trying to be vigilant about checking applicants' backgrounds. I've been doing some research and apparently, the courts can "suppress" records of eviction proceedings for cases that are pending (the ones where eviction has been granted will show in the background check, (I hope and think). Am I wrong in assuming that if eviction is pending from another property they wouldn't be applying for my property? I almost know the answer, which brings me to the next question: If a current eviction procedure can be suppressed am I totally out of luck trying to screen a person in this regard? (assuming there isn't a string of late payments and so on the credit report). Thanks in advance for the responses.

Post: Support Animal (s)

Makan A TabriziPosted
  • Posts 43
  • Votes 20

I did. Thanks very much for the advice.

Post: Support Animal (s)

Makan A TabriziPosted
  • Posts 43
  • Votes 20
Quote from @Brad Larsen:
Quote from @Makan A Tabrizi:

I have two two-bedroom apartment for rent (950 sq/ft). I just had a prospective tenant ask me if I'm OK with him having 4 support animals. These are labs at about 60 lbs per animal. Normally I accept two 2 animals if they are preapproved. I understand you're supposed to accept support animals (with a letter from a qualified therapist?) and there are no limits as to the number of animals (?). A quick check on Google tells me that it isn't all that hard getting the said letter. Logic alone tells me that there has to be a limiting factor. You can't allow a tenant to bring in a herd of animals, even if you could collect pet rent + pet deposit (Which I believe you can not for support animals). Or am I wrong? Thank you for your suggestions and/comments.


 Hi Makan,

There is a service out there you can refer the applicants to called Pet Screening.  You should research the services they offer and would hope it will help you out tremendously.  Hope that helps,

Best

Brad


 Thanks. I'm looking into that right now.

Post: Support Animal (s)

Makan A TabriziPosted
  • Posts 43
  • Votes 20

I have two two-bedroom apartment for rent (950 sq/ft). I just had a prospective tenant ask me if I'm OK with him having 4 support animals. These are labs at about 60 lbs per animal. Normally I accept two 2 animals if they are preapproved. I understand you're supposed to accept support animals (with a letter from a qualified therapist?) and there are no limits as to the number of animals (?). A quick check on Google tells me that it isn't all that hard getting the said letter. Logic alone tells me that there has to be a limiting factor. You can't allow a tenant to bring in a herd of animals, even if you could collect pet rent + pet deposit (Which I believe you can not for support animals). Or am I wrong? Thank you for your suggestions and/comments.

Quote from @Bill S.:

@Grant Shipman so you are being a bit stiff with your approach. I understand it has to be able to be written down. Here are some thoughts. 1) request the last three places they have lived. If they complain they don't have a rental history tell them living in the college dorm and living at home is adequate. After you get that information verify it. Talk to as many people as possible and find out their character, if they pay bills and are dependable. I certainly don't want to penalize the kid just out of college over someone who has lived in a different place each of the past five years. 

2) request past employment and call them. I have found that how people were at work is a good indicator of how they will be to live with. Someone who misses shifts or calls in sick whenever there is a great powder day would not make the cut.  Someone who is dependable and reliable as an employee will typically make a great tenant.

3) Lose the whole 4x rent for SD in exchange for income. It's a smoke screen at best. People without income don't make good tenants in the long term. The exception would be someone moving to the area without a job but in a field that is in high demand (nursing) if they have savings. I don't drain the savings by asking for a high SD. If they are good people you will not likely have a problem.

4) If you are having a problem filling you property you are asking too much for rent. Lower rents and you will get better quality people.

5) Avoid the "interview" requirement. You will have a lot of time to interact with them. Learn to ask open ended questions and let them talk. Ask things like, "What are you looking for in your new living situation?" Learn to pre-screen people with a few basic questions for the phone or email to weed-out tire kickers and deadbeats looking for a handout. Most people are going to want to view the property, so use that time to gauge them as people. Again ask them open ended questions about their prior living situations and their employment. 

6) Have written criteria about what a tenant must have. For example, 3x income or must not badmouth previous landlord even if they were a bad landlord. Remember, the tenants selected them as a landlord so it shows a lack of personal responsibility for getting themselves in that situation. 

7) Reverse your order of screening. If you ask them upfront if they have had evictions, criminal history or lousy credit and they lie you will find out. Most will be straight and tell you if they have issues. At that point, let them know they won't work and move on. They will have a story and want to tell you the story. Once they launch into that I usually tell them that they are probably great people but our attorney tells use we have to be consistent to protect us from fair housing violation claims . You are wasting a lot of time if you show the property and then find out they have an eviction. 

8) It seems like from your process description you don't have an application. You need to get an application. They need to fill that out. The application should give you permission to verify the information on it and to run their credit. 

9) Typical process would be something like this. 1) Advertise (everywhere you can and like a mad man) 2) take calls, emails and text inquiries (most want to see the property). 3) pre-screen applicants via phone, email or text (use the same questions for all inquires in order to be consistent and protect against fair housing claims). 4)Those that pass phone screening set appointments to see the property. 5) Prospects view property and go through your informal questioning 6) if applicants like the property and want to rent it, have them complete an application and pay the application fee. 7) applicants complete the application and pay the fee, THEN you screen the information on the application. 8) run credit criminal and eviction check. If they have passed to this point rent the property to them.


 Excellent summary for a beginner. Thank you Bill.

Quote from @Kevin Sobilo:

@Makan A Tabrizi, sounds dumb but actually not as different than you think!

People can't pay rent on GROSS income 2x rent, so this must mean they intend NET income not GROSS income. The legislator's there are obviously not fit to make these decisions because that is a pretty big and obvious omission in the text of the law.

https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/2023a_184_signe...

The rule of thumb is generally GROSS income 3x rent which is pretty close to NET income 2x rent. So, they really didn't change anything substantial there!

A note of greater concern is nearer the bottom of the law. The tenants "cash assets" count towards their yearly income. So, if a tenant earns $30k but has $10k in savings their "income" is considered to be $40k for application purposes. 

Here are a couple ideas:

1) That part of the law seems to ONLY apply if you use credit scores/reports. So, if you don't you can use any criteria you want.

2) If you do use a credit report, you could tighten things up by looking at their monthly debt. I also require "Rent + Monthly Debt Payments<= 45% x Gross Income".

However with the new law you couldn't use this income requirement. So, you could simply set a maximum debt percentage like "Monthly Debt Payments <= 50% rent". That quite as accurate, but for the most part accomplishes a similar screening without using income.

For me, I would probably drop credit from my screening and RAISE my income requirement. If they have more income and no evictions or civil judgements I would be fairly confident. 


 Thank you for your input, most helpful. 

Quote from @Nathan Gesner:
Quote from @Makan A Tabrizi:

People can sue you at any time, for any reason.

You only open yourself up to liability if they can prove discrimination against a protected class. If you charge a different price for single moms than you do for married couples, then you could be in trouble. If you have a rental open and choose to charge a different rate than you've charged existing renters, there's nothing illegal about that. Prices fluctuate all the time. Grocery stores charge more for milk on Tuesday than they did on Sunday.

 Gotcha. Airlines charge different prices for seats on the same plane but I wasn't sure how this would work with housing. Thank you for your input.

Quote from @Nathan Gesner:
Quote from @Makan A Tabrizi:

It is a stupid law. Landlords will approve someone earning 2x the rent, but they'll simply increase the deposit or charge a higher rent to offset the risk.

Yes, I would require a double deposit for a high-risk tenant. I do not use "last month's rent" because that may cause confusion, particularly if the Tenant decides to extend or renew.


 Would charging different rent and/or deposit for different tenants in the same building open me up for liability?