Contract for deed would be a more accurate description. Maybe Tennessee law is the issue here? The example I've been given by numerous attorneys is if the Seller experiences a medical situation and Medicare is needed, they cannot get that care as long as they own that property and they are then forced to sale, or it can be attached by Medicare. Then they follow up "any number of things can happen and the Buyer is not protected". Vague right.
I had a deal where my Buyer was fully aware of the risk he was taking in asking for short-term owner-financing and it seemed there was nothing I could say to convince 4 different attorneys to handle the closing. They flat out refused to touch it. We were luckily able to get the Seller to agree to hold earnest money for the short term while he moved investments around to close with cash.
I handled several deals with Owner Financing in the 1990's and closing attorneys had no problems whatsoever with it. We bought our first investment property this way. I'm not understanding the resistance here when I see a lot of people supposedly still doing deals this way.