Thanks Chris.
First, thank you for the excellent reply.
> I call them nomads too. :)
Awesome!
> It'll be worth your time to have them working with a minimal overlays lender that can count departing residence rental income regardless of equity position or prior landlord experience.
Yes... I have actually modeled *part* of this. I did not take into account prior landlord experience and we don't count the equity they have.
What I do though is figure out how much income would be required with the following assumptions:
- We use 75% of gross rent from each property
- We subtract the full mortgage principle and interest payment for each property
- We subtract the full monthly HOA for each property
- We subtract the monthly utilities they are paying on each rental property (often this is zero since tenant pays in most cases)
- We subtract monthly property taxes for each property
- We subtract monthly insurance for each property
Then, we divide by .45 for debt to income to find out how much income they'd either need to offset and "carry" this negative cash flowing rental or how much income this property contributes and therefore how much less income they need to earn.
Does that seem right to you?
Here is a chart showing the minimum income required assuming the borrower has no other debt with them buying a new house each year for ten years. They live in the house for the first year then convert it to a rental.
In the model above, the property value is going up 3%per year so you're buying properties that cost 3% more each year. Rent is also going up 3% per year. You're putting 5% down on each property (remember this is as an owner occupant).
> You as the expert in marketing real estate can be a huge help: you will want a lease signed and security deposit made in time for underwriter review, prior to releasing financing contingency because hypothetical tenants and hypothetical rental income will not cut it.
Yes, I totally agree. We recommend our Nomads start marketing to find their tenant at least 60 days prior to a lease ending or prior to them moving out and converting their primary residence to a rental.
> Specified move-in date on the lease to be a few weeks after the scheduled close of escrow.
We'd even recommend sooner if possible.
> Getting that in time for underwriter review prior to financing contingency removal is huge -- you don't want to put a $30k EMD on the line over chasing $75 extra per month in rent.
Yes. In our market we rarely see $30K earnest money, but why risk even $3K earnest money.
> If you pair those two things together (minimal overlays lender local to you + you getting that tenant/deposit quickly) you could very well have a niche value add area that not a lot of other agents know how to serve, in your area, much less how to serve them well.
Yes, that's what we're finding.
> If working with James Orr and his go-to lender means I can buy a $450k home, whereas everyone else I'm talking to caps me at $150k (due to hitting my DTI with full PITI of both homes), obviously I'm going to be working with James, right?
I would hope that's not the only reason, but yes.
> Trivia: there's a deal in escrow right now where the wife lost her job three days after going under contract. Dead deal, right? Nope. Departing residence rental income, and an agent busting his butt to market the rental unit and find a tenant quick-like-and-in-a-hurry, saved the deal.
That's super interesting. Had not thought about that as a way to possibly save the deal.
> It helps that I always work for minimal overlays firms (specifically for this type of deal-saving added flexibility) and I identified the solution, but the agent got to be the hero in the eyes of the homebuyers too, for marketing the property, finding that tenant, and getting that security deposit so quickly.
Yes. I would agree with that as well.
Thanks again for the reply. I do appreciate it.