Jo-Ann, Hemet values did suffer from the downturn, but the rebound has not been as fast as other IE markets along the I-15 & I-215 corridors, which is one reason why I like the area. I did some quick research to better answer your question and found that comparing Hemet peak values (2006) to 2015, resales are 65% of peak, and new home is 70% of peak. I don't contend that we will ever reach 2006 numbers again, but I do believe that something bought inland that is only 65% of peak will incur 10% - 15% in appreciation as people become priced out of coastal markets and the demand moves east. Furthermore, because I can get these 4-plexes for $350K they generate solid cash flow at +/-$800 per unit per month in rent.
To answer your question on volume, resale activity is almost 3/4 of peak, but new home activity is less than 10%. Affordability of resale in A/B inland markets (Temecula, Murrieta, Menifee, Corona, etc.) reduces new home demand in C inland markets because most buyers will choose to live in a in 10-15 yr-old home within a better market rather than buy new in a lesser market (ie Hemet, San Jacinto, Cochella Valley, etc.). The table below shows the data I pulled from Real Estate Economics. Please chime in on my assumptions.
- | Resale | Resale | New Home | New Home |
Period | Closings | Price | Closings | Price |
2006 AVG | 287 | 311,220 | 217 | 383,457 |
2015 AVG | 207 | 201,026 | 16 | 265,748 |
Delta | 80 | 110,194 | 202 | 117,709 |
% of Peak | 72.17% | 64.59% | 7.21% | 69.30% |
Finally, yes, I am looking at units that are 2 bed 1 bath, with a few exceptions that include a second bath.