Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Kurt Williams

Kurt Williams has started 1 posts and replied 3 times.

Post: ONTARIO: NEW EVICTION RULES (..SIGH)

Kurt WilliamsPosted
  • OTTAWA, ontario
  • Posts 3
  • Votes 2

It's a fine so it would go to the Government for sure.  That said, I'm sure the tenant would still be able to file a lawsuit against you above and beyond that 25k fine. 

I have to figure out if this new rule is retroactive. 

Post: ONTARIO: NEW EVICTION RULES (..SIGH)

Kurt WilliamsPosted
  • OTTAWA, ontario
  • Posts 3
  • Votes 2

.. Yes. Typo. I meant 25k. 

I'm sure no one at the LTB will be able to give an answer as it has never been tested in court (whether or not it is retroactively applicable). 

To be honest, the compensation part doesn't bother me at all. The one-year commitment is ridiculous.

Post: ONTARIO: NEW EVICTION RULES (..SIGH)

Kurt WilliamsPosted
  • OTTAWA, ontario
  • Posts 3
  • Votes 2

Just looking to get a conversation going on the amendments to S.48 of the Ontario Residential Tenancies Act.

Landlords are now required to pay one month worth of rent when evicting for the purpose of taking over the unit for themselves.

^ Not a huge deal, but the bit about committing to one year or be fined $2,500.00 is ridiculous. I mean, could they not have made it 6 months?

Also, question: If a notice was served to a tenant mid July 2017 (Eviction for landlords own use) PRIOR to the amendment taking effect on Sept 1, 2017 , yet the eviction date is after (Oct 1, 2017), does it make a different (grandfathered) or is the landlord  screwed under the new law?

Thoughts?

Tks!