Hi! I own and operate a property management firm in Chicago.
Generally, tenants don’t have the right to demand relocation for purely cosmetic improvements, nationally. The protocol, my team tasks in situations like this would be the following:
First, evaluate if the requested repair is truly cosmetic or if it impacts habitability. Cosmetic issues like the one's you explained do not pose an inhabitability concern. Whereas habitability issues, like structural repairs, may. Cosmetic repairs that don’t pose health or safety concerns are typically optional.
Then be very transparent and communicate thoroughly to the tenant, as to provide a professional explanation for your decision forward. Let the tenant know which repairs fall under cosmetic upgrades versus necessary maintenance. Being clear about what’s covered in the lease and by local laws can avoid misunderstandings and set their realistic expectations.
If you do plan to carry out the cosmetic upgrades (because the property is overdue and of course you want to ensure your tenants are enjoying their home to the best of your abilities), try to schedule the repairs at times that minimize disruption. You can offer options like reduced rent during disruptive repairs instead of relocation; simply as a courtesy, but absolutely not required.
Specifically, here in Chicago, the Residential Landlord Tenant Ordinance (RLTO) explains that owners are not required to relocate tenants for cosmetic issues, unless the work significantly impacts habitability, as expressed above.
AND THE MOST IMPORTANT PART, document all communication and decisions about the repair requests. This ensures you’re protected in case of disputes and shows your commitment to maintaining the property thoughtfully and responsibly.
I know this was longggg, but hope it helps you or anyone else with this same question.