Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Yogesh Kumar

Yogesh Kumar has started 1 posts and replied 7 times.

Originally posted by @Jennifer T.:
Originally posted by @Yogesh Kumar:
Originally posted by @Jennifer T.:

1 and 2.  3-5 year shelf life for paint sounds about right.  But since the walls did get painted and the shades were off, I could potentially see where you would be responsible for that.  However, only for whatever room(s) themselves might have had the two different shades in them.  For example, if only one room had paint from both the first and second purchase, than only that room would need to be professionally repainted.  Not the entire floor.  That would be ridiculous and outrageous. 

3. Speaking just about the cost, yes, $3500 is probably in the rough ballpark to have a number of rooms professionally paint.  Paint may not cost much, but painting is time consuming and labor intensive.

Countertop: It's hard to say from your description.  Your LL would have an obligation to repair before replace.  It sounds like maybe the luster/finish of the granite was damaged.  TBH, I don't know much about granite and if that could be fixable or not.  Even so, they would only be entitled to the pro-rated cost of a new granite countertop.

Yard and Lawn:  This one seems pretty cut and dry to me.  You all agreed on X, Y, Z done by your guy for $230.  Was there any communication that the job he'd done was not satisfactory?  If so, then you should have been given the opportunity to have him remedy it.  But, if nothing was said to you, then that was a done deal and they have no right to come back to you for more.

Faucet:  They would really need to prove there was something negligent you did that caused the faucet to leak.  A leaking faucet is typically just a faucet that has come to the end of its life.  Replacing a faucet is a fairly quick and easy task for a plumber, but they'll charge one hour of time and sometimes there is a longer minimum for any service call.  Plus the cost of the faucet. 

Take this with the caveat that I am not a lawyer nor am I familiar with landlord/tenant law in CT, but I don't think the LL needs to provide you with proof of payment.  Legitimate estimates for legitimate damages, absolutely!  But I'd think they can charge for damages, whether they plan to get them fixed or not.

Here's an analogy on that.  Let's say you get rear-ended by another car.  The value of damages to your car is determined to be a new bumper, which costs $1200.  Neither the other driver nor their insurance company can demand that they are only responsible for paying you, if you get the bumper fixed.  If you'd rather pocket the $1200 and drive with a dented, scratched up bumper, that's perfectly fine.

Overall, do I think your LL is being unfair and gouging?  I do.  What can you do about it?  I'd write a response letter with what you believe to be are fair deductions and send it certified, return receipt.  If the LL is still unwilling to come to a compromise, then either they can take you to small claims court or you could take them.  I'd be really surprised if they took you to small claims court, considering they've already kept your $5200 SD.  I think they'd have a hard time proving to a judge that you are responsible for a total of $8,000 in damages and they know that.

 Thank you for the detailed reply. 

Re: Even so, they would only be entitled to the pro-rated cost of a new granite countertop. It means that I should not be responsible for the total cost and should only be responsible for the prorated cost depending upon the age of the countertop. Is that correct?

Re Yard: She never said that anything wrong until a month. Then she sent me the invoice for the new company mentioning the other person did not do a perfect job. She thinks this is negotiable.

Faucet: But if it has come to the end of its life, then I should not be responsible for that. Correct?

Countertop: Yes, that is exactly what I mean.  I don't know the life expectancy of a granite countertop, but they should last a pretty long time.  Just to throw a number out, if they should be expected to last for 30 years and the countertop was already 15 years old, then you would potentially be responsible for half of the cost of a new one.  Ah ha!  Something I forgot about granite.  It needs to be sealed about once a year.  I believe that is mainly to keep stains from potentially seeping into the porous material that granite is.  But if she never did that or gave you instructions to do that, maybe it negatively affected the finish also.

Yard:  Exactly!  If she didn't like the job your maintenance person did, than she needed to notify you promptly and given you a chance to contact him and fix whatever she didn't like, that was part of that agreement.

Faucet:  Yes, you are correct.  A faucet that has come to the end of its life is not your responsibility.  It falls under the category of "wear and tear".  Because, stuff breaks!  No matter how careful people are.  I have certainly had my plumber replace faucets in my rentals that had just worn out.  It wouldn't have even occurred to me to charge that back to my tenants.

If your LL sues you in small claims for the additional $2800, the burden will be on her to prove ALL the damages.  To get to the total of $8,000.  That's why I'd be shocked if she actually sued you.  But people have done crazier things.  I read your post that you didn't take pics/video before you moved in.  But I hope you did, before you moved out.  If not, that's okay also.  The burden of proof is still on her.  It just bolsters your story if you have pics to show the granite countertop looked fine when you left.  Or the paint job looked fine/ "this was the only room that had a slightly different shade, I don't know why she repainted the whole downstairs".  If it were me, I'd probably just prepare with a sheet of notes with bullet points for each claim of damage and why I don't feel responsible for all/part of each item. 

Fortunately, I've only been to court a few times, lol.  But it's a lot more of each side just telling their story, then it is handing the judge reams of evidence. 

 Thank you, Jennifer, again for the detailed reply. Actually, the countertop was formica. Sorry for my ignorance. I did take the detailed pictures of every corner while moving out. 

She did provide within 30 days. But I don't agree as many of them are normal wear and tears.

Originally posted by @David Cruice:

@Yogesh Kumarid your landlord provide you with an official "written notice of damages" within 30 days of you moving out?  This is key as to whether you can file a counterclaim against your landlord.

 Thanks, David. But what if I don't agree with the explanation? How the process work after that?

Originally posted by @Jennifer T.:

1 and 2.  3-5 year shelf life for paint sounds about right.  But since the walls did get painted and the shades were off, I could potentially see where you would be responsible for that.  However, only for whatever room(s) themselves might have had the two different shades in them.  For example, if only one room had paint from both the first and second purchase, than only that room would need to be professionally repainted.  Not the entire floor.  That would be ridiculous and outrageous. 

3. Speaking just about the cost, yes, $3500 is probably in the rough ballpark to have a number of rooms professionally paint.  Paint may not cost much, but painting is time consuming and labor intensive.

Countertop: It's hard to say from your description.  Your LL would have an obligation to repair before replace.  It sounds like maybe the luster/finish of the granite was damaged.  TBH, I don't know much about granite and if that could be fixable or not.  Even so, they would only be entitled to the pro-rated cost of a new granite countertop.

Yard and Lawn:  This one seems pretty cut and dry to me.  You all agreed on X, Y, Z done by your guy for $230.  Was there any communication that the job he'd done was not satisfactory?  If so, then you should have been given the opportunity to have him remedy it.  But, if nothing was said to you, then that was a done deal and they have no right to come back to you for more.

Faucet:  They would really need to prove there was something negligent you did that caused the faucet to leak.  A leaking faucet is typically just a faucet that has come to the end of its life.  Replacing a faucet is a fairly quick and easy task for a plumber, but they'll charge one hour of time and sometimes there is a longer minimum for any service call.  Plus the cost of the faucet. 

Take this with the caveat that I am not a lawyer nor am I familiar with landlord/tenant law in CT, but I don't think the LL needs to provide you with proof of payment.  Legitimate estimates for legitimate damages, absolutely!  But I'd think they can charge for damages, whether they plan to get them fixed or not.

Here's an analogy on that.  Let's say you get rear-ended by another car.  The value of damages to your car is determined to be a new bumper, which costs $1200.  Neither the other driver nor their insurance company can demand that they are only responsible for paying you, if you get the bumper fixed.  If you'd rather pocket the $1200 and drive with a dented, scratched up bumper, that's perfectly fine.

Overall, do I think your LL is being unfair and gouging?  I do.  What can you do about it?  I'd write a response letter with what you believe to be are fair deductions and send it certified, return receipt.  If the LL is still unwilling to come to a compromise, then either they can take you to small claims court or you could take them.  I'd be really surprised if they took you to small claims court, considering they've already kept your $5200 SD.  I think they'd have a hard time proving to a judge that you are responsible for a total of $8,000 in damages and they know that.

 Thank you for the detailed reply. 

Re: Even so, they would only be entitled to the pro-rated cost of a new granite countertop. It means that I should not be responsible for the total cost and should only be responsible for the prorated cost depending upon the age of the countertop. Is that correct?

Re Yard: She never said that anything wrong until a month. Then she sent me the invoice for the new company mentioning the other person did not do a perfect job. She thinks this is negotiable.

Faucet: But if it has come to the end of its life, then I should not be responsible for that. Correct?

In short, if I am willing to move on with a loss of $5200, what are the chances she wants to sue. And if she does, then I would like to prepare well and may well want to recover part of my security deposit as I certainly feel that I do not owe $5200.

Originally posted by @David Cruice:

@Yogesh Kumar this is why you ALWAYS take plenty of video and pictures when you move into and out of a rental property.  If your former kept your full $5,200 in initial security deposit it sounds like she's already making more money from you than she should.  You need to do your own research on this issue.  Simpy Google Connecticut landlord tenant law claim on security deposit".  Here's an except from a quick search I did:

When Do Landlords Have To Return Security Deposits?

Did your landlord provide you with an official "written notice of damages" within 30 days of you moving out?  

It was my fault that I did not take any videos or photos while moving in. I never had such issues in the past. She did provide me the details which I don't agree with.

I am not sure, but I think it came off slightly due to water seepage near the sink. It is not broken. It is just uneven.

I moved out in end of June 2018 from a house in the state of Connecticut. The issue about security deposit and repairs has been going on since then. I think my landlord has been acting unreasonably and unfairly trying to extract more money out of me. I need advice about the specifics points:

Paint: The unit was painted 3 years before I moved in and I lived there for 2 years. It had multiple marks but no physical damage. The landlord wanted me to get the first floor painted. I got it painted with the color approved by the landlord. But we were short of paint and got more paint with the same color and completed the task. On closer look, the 2nd color we bought was slightly different from first which might be due to paint from the different company in Homedepot. Now she got it repainted with 2 coats and sends me a bill of $3500 for the living room, dining room, and stairwell.

My questions about paint are:

1. Since now I have been reading the rules, paint has a self-life of 3-5 years and unless I have damaged the walls, I am not responsible for it. Is that true?

2. Since it was only a matter of slight difference in the color, am I responsible for double coating?

3. Is $3500 a reasonable price for paint?

Countertop: There was slight damage to the granite countertop, which she wants me to pay. She has not got it fixed but sending me the invoice of $2100. Is that reasonable?

Yard and lawn: I have been maintaining the yard with bi-weekly maintenance person doing all the year work. The landlord, in the end, wanted to use his/her company and get it done his/her way. I heard that guy giving a quote of $500 which he said is negotiable. We agreed to use my maintenance person with a price of $230. Now I am being sent a bill of 1100 from a third company even after the work done by my guy as we agreed. Effectively she wants me to pay $1330, even if the company he/she was planning to hire quoted only $500 with space for negotiation. This is a red flag that the landlord is trying to get the money out of my unfairly.

Faucet: The faucet in the kitchen broke down within a week before the move out date and there was a water leak. Now the landlord thinks that it is by negligence and wants me to pay for it. Not just the price but also the labor charges i.e. 500. I think it should be her responsibility? Is that correct?

Inflated estimates/invoice: Now the real issue is about sending me the inflated estimates/invoice. When I asked for the real proof of payment, the landlord is sending me an invoice with a handwritten note saying paid in cash. How can I trust it? Some other are receipts of payment.

Summary: To summarize, the landlord has already kept $5200 security deposit and asking for $2800 more. I think the landlord is trying to take advantage of the fact that I am trying to solve it peacefully to move on. But taking my willingness to move on as weakness and incrementally increasing the bill amount unreasonably.

So, I want to prepare myself for all eventualities. I need guidance regarding my situation according to the laws in CT.  What will happen in this case if we plan to move to a small claims court? Any help will be appreciated.