Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Kevin Hofstee

Kevin Hofstee has started 9 posts and replied 48 times.

Post: national rent control

Kevin HofsteePosted
  • Investor
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 9
Quote from @James Hamling:
Quote from @Kevin Hofstee:
Quote from @Kevin Sobilo:

I believe there’s a middle ground where both parties are satisfied....


Serious question; Exactly where is a "middle ground" between Democratic Republic and Marxist Socialism???? 

I don't see how there can be any middle ground, they are fundamentally opposed. What your saying to me sounds a lot like "kinda pregnant", it's just one of those things where there is no middle ground you either are or are not. 

I don't see how a country can be "kinda Communist".... 

You’re using a slippery slope argument, a middle ground policy between socialism and capitalism doesn’t lead to Marxism.  Our neighbors to the north aka Canada have rent control in most provinces (I think) and also have successful investors (I’ve got family that are). Almost everything is on a spectrum, it’s not a binary choice.

Post: national rent control

Kevin HofsteePosted
  • Investor
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 9
Quote from @Kevin Sobilo:
Quote from @Kevin Hofstee:


Quote from @Kevin Sobilo:
Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Josh C.:

A president talked about rent control. Is a website about real estate not suppose to address that? It’s clear what politics are in favor of rent control and how that’s going for them.


No kidding right  geesh.. Rent control is a huge topic to RE buy and hold investors full stop. 

It sounds like it is as I suggested where they won't create a rent control law but change the tax code to take away some deductions (maybe depreciation) if rents are increased over 5%. This would only apply to landlords with 50+ rentals I believe as well.

So, because the federal government can't make a law about rent control, they coerce compliance with their wishes using money. This is why I believe in a small federal government. By giving them such a large chunk of money we give them more power than they are entitled to have because they can offer to give it to us back but only if we do as they want.

Unpopular opinion, but if rent control is done right it’s not a bad thing.  It’s when there’s a patchwork of laws in a local area that really messes market dynamics and then people don’t move and others are forced to unecessarily.  There needs to be mechanisms to be able update a property and raise its rent to market that isn’t overly harmful to tenants or landlords, and then you’d have a good functioning market.


I agree its not a bad thing, but it isn't a good thing either. It is a WRONG thing and there is a difference.

In your utopian view of things the world works in lockstep and everyone gets what they want from the situation. An investor gets a modest return and the tenant gets decent housing at an affordable price. Sounds like a win-win.

Whether that is possible, and it may be for short periods of time, or not doesn't matter because it’s a WRONG thing. Our country is made for us to make of it what we wish and for that we are entitled to do the best for ourselves that we can. The government limiting our ability to take advantage of opportunities is contrary to the values this country was founded on. So, for our country it is a wrong thing because it runs contrary to our values. 

It’s 100% a subjective thing, it runs contrary to your values not the country’s (I don’t know if you surveyed the country where the opinion would land).  You deem it wrong from your POV - which is fine, and part of what makes the country great that we can have a difference of opinions and debate the merits of various opinions/ideas.


I’ve experienced it both ways - as a landlord I can get more money in my pocket, always welcome - but I’m also not buying something if it’s not cash flowing.  As a prior renter I had a proposed rent raised from $2800 to $3500 (with no upgrades/changes to the unit or building), a 25% increase, which I definitely could not afford at the time, and forced me to spend a bunch of money moving.  That’s not a great experience, and just makes it harder on the little guy trying to get ahead in life.
 
I believe there’s a middle ground where both parties are satisfied.  That’s just my opinion though.

Post: national rent control

Kevin HofsteePosted
  • Investor
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 9


Quote from @Kevin Sobilo:
Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Josh C.:

A president talked about rent control. Is a website about real estate not suppose to address that? It’s clear what politics are in favor of rent control and how that’s going for them.


No kidding right  geesh.. Rent control is a huge topic to RE buy and hold investors full stop. 

It sounds like it is as I suggested where they won't create a rent control law but change the tax code to take away some deductions (maybe depreciation) if rents are increased over 5%. This would only apply to landlords with 50+ rentals I believe as well.

So, because the federal government can't make a law about rent control, they coerce compliance with their wishes using money. This is why I believe in a small federal government. By giving them such a large chunk of money we give them more power than they are entitled to have because they can offer to give it to us back but only if we do as they want.

Unpopular opinion, but if rent control is done right it’s not a bad thing.  It’s when there’s a patchwork of laws in a local area that really messes market dynamics and then people don’t move and others are forced to unecessarily.  There needs to be mechanisms to be able update a property and raise its rent to market that isn’t overly harmful to tenants or landlords, and then you’d have a good functioning market.

@Scott Smith can you further explain why a DST for Californians? Is this only helpful if the properties are also in California?

Post: HELOC on Investment Property

Kevin HofsteePosted
  • Investor
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 9

Curious if anyone's had good luck with any of the above of late?  Sadly PenFed had been recommended to me multiple times, and they recently stopped doing investment property HELOCs.

Post: Incorporate LLC in Wyoming Vs Michigan?

Kevin HofsteePosted
  • Investor
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 9

From my understanding Michigan has that same level of anonymity, so then why still have the Wyoming LLC on top of that?

Post: Solo 401k

Kevin HofsteePosted
  • Investor
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 9

@Brian Eastman What about income that is 1099-MISC?  My limited understanding of the topic, was any 1099 income counted towards getting a Solo 401k

Post: Solo 401k

Kevin HofsteePosted
  • Investor
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 9

@Brian Eastman in talking with a few of the companies who set them up (eQRP and Nabers) their distinction was as long as you have 1099 income that counts as self employed in order to setup a solo 401k.

Post: Impact of new vinyl siding vs. painting existing on ARV

Kevin HofsteePosted
  • Investor
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 9

Hi All - in the process of rehabbing a property that I will plan to cash out refi once done. I've got an option to scrape & paint the current siding for $6K (I believe it's wood), vs. do new vinyl siding for about $15-16K. Not clear if the ROI is there on vinyl siding to bump the ARV vs. just painting, and would be curious on others opinion. The property is in Muskegon, Michigan, which can have some harsh winter weather.

Post: Solo 401k

Kevin HofsteePosted
  • Investor
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 9

@Brian Eastman multiple times in this thread you've said managing rentals is passive.  From reading the BP tax strategy books managing rentals even if through a property manager is still considered active.  Are you able to share your source or what the thought is behind saying that?  From my understanding giving money to a syndicator as a limited partner or note investing is passive.