Quote from @Kenneth LaVoie:
As the day progresses (and more back and forth with our agent), bits and pieces are coming back. We bought many of these properties very cheap and pretty distressed (duplex, all renovated ready to rent for 27K, 11 unit for 180K, couple 7-units fully rented for 160K ea. etc.) The cash value limits were up in the half million range for these properties and I believe at the time it would've been just fine regardless of full or partial loss. But over the decade, we've upgraded steadily, and even though the values stagnated for the first 5-6 years, the uptick in values started in late 2016 and i think that's why I'm suddenly realizing we've a little underinsured. I am considering putting feelers out however.
I recently introduced myself as a first time rental buyer. This 4 bed property is for my daughter and three friends to live in for the next three years while attending college in Akron. Purchase and light reno will put me at about $110,000 all in. While discussing insurance with my AM Fam agent today, he is quoting $1400/yr for replacement cost at $350,000 and $1100 for cash value at $150,000 both with $1000 deductible. 1M liability.
I’m really struggling to understand why I would want replacement value on a rental. If the whole thing burns to the ground and I’m left with just an empty lot, I wouldn’t necessarily care to rebuild, I could just take cash value and walk away without a loss. But on the other hand, a brand new build would be more valuable if I sold it after a rebuild. And it’s only $300/yr difference for a premium product I guess. I’m a little confused as to what decision to make on this. This property doesn’t have to make me a bunch of money, it’s a learning opportunity for me and a nice place for my daughter to live in for school. Thoughts?