Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Kendric Buford

Kendric Buford has started 2 posts and replied 3 times.

Ah great, thank you for the clarity. I really appreciate it

I've been trying to wrap my head around assumable mortgages, but I'm not sure I get it fully. Can someone tell me if this scenario is accurate, or explain it like I'm a child?
Scenario: (using round numbers so I can follow better)
Seller is trying to sell their house for $300,000 but can't. Their Original Purchase Price was $250,000 at 3%. They currently have $50,000 in equity in the property. I offer to buy it by assuming their mortgage. Does that mean I'd take over the remaining loan of $200,000 at 3%, then I'd have to pay the seller $50,000 for their current equity, and an additional $50,000 to cover the difference from the initial amount they wanted to sell for ($300,000)? - Also, I presume this is where my cash and/or a second mortgage would come in, so I can pay the seller.

**To keep things as simple as possible, I didn't mention any closing costs or commission to an agent for this scenario.  

So at the end of all this, if I'm understanding correctly, the Seller would walk away with the $100,000 that they would have from a normal sale, but I get a 3% mortgage rate and the property?

First time posting here, so please bare with me. I'm in a unique position after an unfortunate event, but I'm determined to make the best of it! Currently I have a single family property that I'm renting out long term, which is cash flowing well. I also have a second single family that I'm house hacking. I'm about to pay off my house hack and looking to expand. I like the idea of long term rentals with a property manager; the lower headaches are worth the slight drop in cash flow. I was considering going the single family route and getting 1-2 more properties here, but through various sources, a small 4 unit multi-family looks like a promising way to scale up. I am a little concerned with the leverage for obtaining a multi-family. My secondary worry is that a small multi-family is going to be less desirable for would-be tenants. If anyone has some advice on the subject I'd appreciate it.