Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Kemisha Anderson

Kemisha Anderson has started 1 posts and replied 1 times.

I purchased a property at auction in Illinois, I went court to see if the sale would be approved, I told the judge that the property was vacant and had been vandalized since I purchased it, and that I would like immediate possession, and he granted me. then I  brought a second property and the same thing happened it was vacant and had been vandalized before my court date, this time I asked the judge for immediate possession and was told  I needed proof that the property was vacant. I spoke to a lawyer outside the court room and asked what proof would I have to show, he said I would have to INSERT myself into the case to prove the property is vacant so that I can take immediate possession next time. Does anyone know what that means or how I insert myself into the case to show vacancy?