Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Kellan Martz

Kellan Martz has started 19 posts and replied 61 times.

Post: Cost to paint a house in Cleveland - Fix or Sell?

Kellan MartzPosted
  • Attorney
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 51

@Dallas Regimbal that is a good point, thank you. It is slightly under market rent already. So repairs could bump it up in rent. This was my first rental property purchase so my original goal was to buy and hold, and accumulate a number of properties. But having been in the game for a few years now, I may want to sent my goals bigger and use the equity towards something bigger.

Post: Cost to paint a house in Cleveland - Fix or Sell?

Kellan MartzPosted
  • Attorney
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 51

I own single family home in a C+ area in Cleveland. The city mandates lead paint testing. I need to paint the home interior and exterior to pass testing. I have gotten two quotes. The one I like slightly better is below. I have owned the home for 2 years. Tenants have been good (pay on time, minimal repairs) but are messy and said they may move out soon. I have 3 options. A) Sell it with repairs needed, B) sell it after doing paint/repairs, or C) make repairs and keep it. I am leaning towards option A or B. Bought it at $45,000. Could likely sell it as-is for $65,000 or after repairs for $75,000 or $80,000. Repairs would be a tax write off potentially. 

Thoughts? Thanks in advance

Exterior paint is $7,500 for: 

- Scrape and paint entire exterior of the
home - (2 story structure)
- Scrape and paint (13) windows
- Scrape and paint awnings
- Windows and trim to be painted white

and interior paint is $3,800 for:

- Make various drywall repairs
throughout the home (walls and
ceilings)
- Paint all interior rooms to include
walls, ceilings and trim

Post: What midwest or southeast market is good for MFR purchases now?

Kellan MartzPosted
  • Attorney
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 51
Quote from @Greg Ross:

@Kellan Martz- Welcome to this exciting world! I have recently shifted my focus to Manhattan, KS. There seems to be an unusually high number of MFR right around the KSU campus (4 block radius) that are primarily rented by students on 12-month leases. These units are typically older and ugly yet they reliably cash flow and consistently stay rented. If you'd like more information I'm happy to help.


 Hey Greg. Thanks! I’ll send you an email shortly.

Post: What midwest or southeast market is good for MFR purchases now?

Kellan MartzPosted
  • Attorney
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 51

Hi all - I started my real estate investing in Aug 2020 with a SFR followed by a duplex in Sept 2020, both in C neighborhoods in Cleveland, OH. I'm ready to buy several properties this year and searching for my next market. What areas do you all find good for buying C, C+, B- properties currently, or the rest of 2022? Open to all suggestions in those regions, but especially interested in hearing more from people who know Indiana, Tennessee, & Missouri. Next buy will hopefully be a 2-4plex for buy and hold. Thanks.

Post: SFH Rental - 30 year vs 15 year

Kellan MartzPosted
  • Attorney
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 51
Quote from @Joe Villeneuve:
Quote from @Kellan Martz:
Quote from @Joe Villeneuve:

Paying off properties is losing money because it's actually costing you money, not saving you money.  The value of the equity isn't in its face value.  The value of equity is in what it represents in property value, and should consistently be maintained as close as possible to your original 1 to 5 relationship of equity to PV.  The closer you let the equity equal the PV, the more that equity decreases in value, and the more the opportunity loss for increased CF grows.

 

@Joe Villeneuve - if I'm reading your comment correctly, you are saying that the equity in your home should be approximately 20% of the current value of the home? Please correct me if I'm wrong. And in keeping that ratio as close to 1 to 5 as possible, what is the value of that? The increased cash flow that can be utilized elsewhere instead of being tied up in equity?

No.  What I'm saying is the value of your equity is NOT the face value of your equity...it's the property value of that property in relation to that equity.  When you buy a property for 20% down, the PV = 5 times the DP...meaning your paid for equity has a value of 5 times its face value.  When a property appreciates, the equity increases $1 for every $1 of appreciation...that's a 1 to 1 cost to value. 
Example:  $110k property value
DP (20%): $20k
PV = $100k
property increases to $120k in PV which means the equity increases to $40k in value.  That means your PV is only worth 3 times the face value of your equity.

Now, sell that same property, take the equity ($40) and reinvest it a 20%, and the new PV = $200k...not $120k, and since you should be buying the same property you bought the first time, that means you would be buying 2 of them...and your CF should be doubled too.
Repeat this over and over, and you have an exponential return...and a fast one at that.
Got it, that makes sense. I appreciate you sharing and explaining. I do better with actual examples, so that helped!

Post: SFH Rental - 30 year vs 15 year

Kellan MartzPosted
  • Attorney
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 51
Quote from @Joe Villeneuve:

Paying off properties is losing money because it's actually costing you money, not saving you money.  The value of the equity isn't in its face value.  The value of equity is in what it represents in property value, and should consistently be maintained as close as possible to your original 1 to 5 relationship of equity to PV.  The closer you let the equity equal the PV, the more that equity decreases in value, and the more the opportunity loss for increased CF grows.

 

@Joe Villeneuve - if I'm reading your comment correctly, you are saying that the equity in your home should be approximately 20% of the current value of the home? Please correct me if I'm wrong. And in keeping that ratio as close to 1 to 5 as possible, what is the value of that? The increased cash flow that can be utilized elsewhere instead of being tied up in equity?

Post: SFH Rental - 30 year vs 15 year

Kellan MartzPosted
  • Attorney
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 51

I agree with @Andy Webb and his comment above to go with the 30-year. The interest rate isn't that different to make me want the 15 year. Maximize cash flow and refinance when the time comes.

Post: Sober-Living Home in Nashville

Kellan MartzPosted
  • Attorney
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 51

I'd be interested in hearing an update on your experience, if you can share - including some of the questions posted by @Sendhil Krishnan  - thanks!

Post: Why Do You Invest in Detroit? (Testimonial Request for BP!)

Kellan MartzPosted
  • Attorney
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 51

@Dylan Tanaka thank you for that assessment on the region. I have investment properties in Cleveland but am looking to branch out. Detroit is the top of my list.