Hi everyone. Which case would be better for you if you were the buyer? To record this property sold at $50k or at $110k?
Case 1: The seller wants $50k in his pocket after COE. He owes $60k for a lien on the property. I draft the purchase agreement at $50k, and in that contract, I state that I, the buyer, will pay off the $60k lien for the seller at closing. When the title company goes to record the warranty deed, it states that the "true consideration for this conveyance is $50k". But on the final settlement statement, it shows that the amount I sent to the title company was $110k (let's disregard the title/escrow fees, etc., for the sake of argument).
Case 2: I draft the purchase agreement at $110k, and in that contract, I state that the seller will pay off his $60k lien at closing. When the title company goes to record the warranty deed, it states that the "true consideration for this conveyance is $110k". And on the final settlement statement, it shows that the amount I sent to the title company was $110k (let's disregard the title/escrow fees, etc., for the sake of argument).
The property is a vacant lot. In the eyes of the IRS, did I purchase this property at $50k or $110k? I figure if I go with case 1, the County or City might charge me less for property taxes. Is there any major disadvantage for me if I choose to go with Case 1? From the perspective of the buyer, which case is better and why? Thanks.