Joel, I want to respond to your comment. Somehow there's been a complete misunderstanding on your part of the events and I'd like to be clear on that. After me initially being okay with the originally requested 4% commission, the commission reduction on my part from 4% to 3% was agreed to by all parties at the time of signing the Offer to Purchase. The septic inspection was done after the commission agreement. In no way, and I want to be clear on this, do I believe that property issues on my personal residence (this deal) or any other deal fall upon the value or responsibility of the agent. The first few paragraphs of your response were totally not the scenario here and I don't believe I said anything to imply that so I am perplexed why you went in that direction.
When questioned about why pay the 4%, the buyer's agent (my ex-listing agent) told me, as others and you have said, that she is doing work for both sides. I asked her what is she doing (beyond what she'd being doing with a listing agent, of which she's would be couping 3%) and did not get an answer. I would take care the things on my end that I need to and feel capable to do so. If I put something on her she doesn't feel is her management/sale issue to deal with she can tell me that I need to speak to someone else to get the answer-no problem, I am learning and don't know the boundaries but am not afraid to learn. I feel 3% is fair in this deal.
I want to point out that having been initially the listing agent in the sale of my home, and now on the buyer side, she has the right and advantage of being able to tell the buyer anything that she learned about my situation and property while my listing agent that will enhance the buyer's purchase to their advantage. And to her credit, the price we ended up agreeing on was fair and good for all.
I have experience beyond selling my personal residence, but not much, and that is where I can be taken advantage of. I am willing to pay for services and care about my reputation. Joel I don't talk in a round about way as you said and never said anywhere that I thought the agent should get a lower commission because of a problem found with my property. For some reason, you decided that was what I was thinking and that was very incorrect.
Thank you though for pointing out that contracts and laws are constantly changing and I will be mindful of that and will be glad to pay my realtors for their expertise, service and knowledge.
I also appreciated your comments about FSBO and getting low ball offers. Fortunately it is easy to do some comp comparison through the various online real estate presences.
Your comments about pre-listing inspection was interesting and very useful information. In my particular situation, my own personal residence, it had been suggested by my agent I pump my septic tank, i had done it 5 years ago and decided against it. Found out the septic FIELD failed the inspection, I was there, and told the inspector the previous maintenance pump said my tank was good, no problems. The inspector said that could be, that the field failing hadn't yet reached my tank. In that case I was glad I didn't have the tank pumped prior to sale (it had been done within a safe range of years prior).
Anyways, you were I think trying to be helpful (giving me a heads up about attorney costs).
Thanks Joel for wishing me luck. I suspect I'll be changing course again and hiring a listing agent. My exit strategy is I want to sell my home as I am moving to Atlanta and looking forward to getting real estate deals under my belt there and at least one buy and hold in Michigan.