Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Christine James

Christine James has started 1 posts and replied 1 times.

We hired a contractor to decommission the septic system and tie into the town sewer in order to sell our house. The contractor tied ONE line into the sewer and dug a hole into the septic tank. The inspector came and stood over the small hole in the tank and then left. Once the inspector left, the contractor filled in the tank. The system had TWO lines from the house to the tank, and the second line was not tied into the sewer. Sewerage filled the yard and the new homeowner had to hire another contractor to fix the mess. We were sued by the new homeowner for their expense since the contract was not with them, but with us. Can we sue the inspector for negligence for not thoroughly inspecting the system, and allowing the contractor to fill it in when the system was not completely decommissioned? Thank you for your help.