Hello all,
I spoke to Stephanie Harrell at Pinnacle today and was informed my return is due to be paid Nov 8th - I'll keep my fingers crossed that all goes well.
Most of my discussions confirmed a lot of what has been discussed in this thread but just to update:
They are no longer accepting new investors. They are phasing this 60day 25% investment out by paying out and closing all accounts.
Their former attorney Mr. Kunkel quit and sent them a letter notifying them of such. They have since acquired new counsel.
They switched from FedEx to UPS because the FedEx carriers were leaving people's checks without having someone sign for them. Checks are being sent via UPS with signature required for delivery.
The termination of the 60 day program, informal investigation or allegations thereof and their transition to the Pinnacle Consulting Concept are all coincidental. In otherwords, they did not move to the Pinnacle Consulting concept because of the article etc.
In my opinion, if they survive paying out all of their investors without any hitches, they will have built a pretty loyal base. I do question the success of their new Pinnacle Consulting Concept based on my understanding of it thus far. It boils down to you paying an annual consulting fee of $150,000 per year to duplicate their success buying REO's at discounts and reselling them for a profit. The only twist I see here is (1) You are responsible for funding each purchase and any required repairs (they say you can use their contractors) (2) After the first 3 months, you are responsible for maintaining your office (person answering your phone etc)
All of this seems to be a work in process as nothing has been finalized yet but the project each office to generate $1M in profit per annum.
My problem is if most investors are like me and they liked the high return potential and passive income potential from what Pinnacle was offering via their ads, why would they want to now "buy themselves a job" with this new Pinnacle Consulting concept? - Seems like a hard sell to me but what do I know.
At this point, Nov 8th couldn't get here quicker for me. Hope everyone else is transitioning out of this OK.
For the individual who posted something on Blue Moon in response to my prior posting, if you go to the NASD and request the disclosures on the incidents, you will find out that they were minor (compliance type infractions) that at the conclusion of both cases were deemed no intent to defraud the public. Blue Moon seems like a viable alternative for those interested in anywhere from an 18-22% annual asset-backed return. However, you must be highly liquid to participate - avg of $150K needed to fund each deal.
If anyone has any information on Golden Pacific Realty (someone posted this earlier) please share.
Regards,
justanotherinvestor.