Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Joshua S.

Joshua S. has started 2 posts and replied 293 times.

Originally posted by @Max T.:

I'd rather use my HELOCs to buy rentals than pay down 30 year fixed rate debt at 3-5% interest :)

I'm confused about your use of the term "rather". Taking a $10K chunk of one of my HELOCs or my PLOC and using it to pay down my primary residence faster doesn't stop me from buying rentals. If you can only do one or the other you got bigger problems to worry about. :-D 

Originally posted by @Mike S.:
Originally posted by @Joshua S.:

Yes, I know I'm paying principal. I've been explaining that over and over. That's the whole point of a mortgage whether it's a fixed first or a HELOC. What I have been saying is that my "cost" is $1000/year worth of interest on the HELOC. Pretty funny that you're saying I'm the one who doesn't understand. LOL

Good luck to you, too!

You are not consistent. You are saying that you don't have extra money to pay the principal on your mortgage and that is why you are using a HELOC, but you don't consider that you have the money to pay the principal back on your HELOC...

Ok, I think I see the problem.

Scenario 1: "Man, I wish I could put more against my mortgage, but I usually only have a couple hundred or a thousand left over in checking at the end of the month and I don't want to tie that up where I can't get it back in case something comes up."

Scenario 2: "I'm so glad that I use this HELOC checking account strategy, because it allows me to put all of my income against my mortgage. Even though I only have a few hundred or a thousand left over at the end of each month (same as above), it all goes toward my mortgage and I can still take it out if something comes up, so it's the best of both worlds."

Can you see a difference between those two things? You're not "paying down" the HELOC, you're putting all of your money toward it every month and paying your bills out of it every month. Assuming that you make more than you spend, it naturally comes down over the course of the year. The so-called "EXTRA" money can be a very small amount, but still go toward the mortgage in this strategy whereas a person with a very small amount left over in their normal checking account isn't going to throw that at the mortgage. The strategy allows you the freedom of putting all of your income toward the mortgage without having to worry about leaving yourself short.

Originally posted by @Brent Coombs:

Before this thread becomes 69 pages long like an earlier thread on more or less the same topic (see link below), I'll quote @Steve Vaughan from that same thread, who asked @Joshua S.: "Don't you have a higher rate or crappier term loan to go after? If the loan getting punched in the face had a higher rate, I think the whole idea would be better received. Yet these 27 pages or whatever are only about paying down a 3% loan".

Yes, that's right.  I thought the arguments being pursued by Joshua in this thread sounded all too familiar, and it seems the intervening two years have done nothing to dim his enthusiasm to borrow money at higher interest to partially pay off a low Interest Rate mortgage, even though mortgage Interest Rates are even lower now than then.  So, I suspect his "whole idea" should be even less well received now, per Steve's pearl of wisdom two years ago.

Here's the link: https://www.biggerpockets.com/...

Perhaps read both sides of the argument there, before reinventing the wheel here?...

Yes, feel free to read about all the theories and ideas elsewhere and then when you want proof that it works you can come to this thread and see all my updates with statements and stuff. That's a good idea. I mean, I'm showing everyone my amortization schedule and my latest statement so they can see my current balance and how different it is from where I should be. You can beat the ideas all to death and talk in circles about what you "think" is wrong with the idea, but I'm actually doing it and I'm offering proof. How would you suggest that I paid an extra $58K toward my mortgage over the last three years, btw, if it's not the strategy working? Did I win the lottery and somehow not notice? Am I independently wealthy and very forgetful? Did my wife and I get $60K worth of raises and then get hit in the head with paint cans by Macaulay Culkin or something? Let me know how you think this could have happened, I'm super interested in your theory.

Go look at my amo table and my statement a couple pages back and you can see a $58K difference. That's all I'm trying to provide here - my experience with it and proof that it works. If you're not interested that's great, you're welcome to blindly criticize or kiss off or whatever you want to do. Other people might look at the proof I'm providing and realize that it holds more weight than what people "think" will happen, so I'm posting for anyone who might be into that. So, yeah, you could call it reinventing the wheel to offer proof that I'm doing it and how well it works instead of offering words and spreadsheets about what I think would happen. I like it. Reinventing the wheel, that's me. LOL 

Anyway, please, PLEASE let me know your theory on how I came up with an extra $58 grand, though, because if it wasn't through this strategy, I'm going to need your help to figure out how to do it again! Thanks.

Originally posted by @Mike S.:

@Joshua Smith

You are not only paying interest on the HELOC. You are also paying Principal...

Count all the money that you you are putting in your HELOC and you will see that if you were putting all that money in your mortgage instead you would be ahead.

But obviously you don't understand that. Wherever the loan is coming from it is still a loan that accrues interest. You are paying the interest. And HELOC rate are usually more expensive than mortgage. You are just playing with the time difference between when you get your salary until when you pay your bills. You are basically removing the cushion of a savings account and using the HELOC instead as your bank account. That part I agree saves money but is dangerous as HELOC can and have been frozen by banks.

I am glad that this system is working for you and making you better at saving money. That’s the whole point and you seem to be an excellent candidate for this system.

Good luck in your endeavors.

Yes, I know I'm paying principal. I've been explaining that over and over. That's the whole point of a mortgage whether it's a fixed first or a HELOC. What I have been saying is that my "cost" is $1000/year worth of interest on the HELOC. Pretty funny that you're saying I'm the one who doesn't understand. LOL

Good luck to you, too!

Originally posted by @Mike S.:
Originally posted by @Joshua S.:

1. Just paying extra principal is not part of the discussion. Most people don't have a ton of extra money lying around - they are looking for other ways to go about things. This strategy works for someone who has very little disposable income. Simply paying additional principal does not. Most people don't even have $400 saved up for an emergency, so they aren't paying extra principal, but that CAN do this strategy without an extra outlay because they're simply shifting debt from one place to another and paying it differently.

No it does not, if you don't pay back the principal of the HELOC, you are paying more interest on the HELOC that you were paying on the mortgage. You seem to forget that the interest that you pay to your HELOC is in addition to the mortgage. So you are paying more every month.

The way you describe it, you need even more cash to pay back the HELOC principal. The only thing that you do, is that you borrow from the HELOC to go to the mortgage. As long as you don't pay back the money that you borrow, you will have to pay interest. And the interest on the HELOC is usually higher than on the mortgage.

As I demonstrated before, you will get ahead if you would put that additional money directly into the mortgage principal instead of using a HELOC.

Velocity banking is fine for people who can't budget as it give them a plan to follow and force them to save more. But you can do better without using the HELOC and paying directly more into the mortgage.

Awesome, now we're getting somewhere. You have a fundamental misunderstanding of the strategy, so if you're willing to listen, I can clear it up for you.

You're not putting the money on the HELOC and letting it sit there, you're basically using the HELOC like a checking account. At the start of the month you have $90K on your mortgage and $10K on the HELOC. Then in a week or two you get paid and the HELOC goes down to $7000. A couple more weeks go by and you get paid again so you are at $4000, but you also get your regular bills - mortgage, car, electric, water, phone, etc. and your balance goes back up to $9000. For the full month, you paid off $1000 total, but your income also held down your average daily balance to $7000, let's say. So, instead of paying interest on the entire $10K, you pay interest based on $7000. Then as you repeat this every month, your HELOC balance dwindles (because you make more than you spend), but you are only paying interest based on the average daily balance each month, which is less than the $10K, because your income is holding it down temporarily. That's the strategy. I don't know where you got the idea that you just let the HELOC sit there, that's contrary to the entire point of what you're doing. The strategy is that you're essentially using the HELOC like an inverse checking account. Income goes in, bills come out. At the end of the month the balance should be less AND throughout the month the balance was being held down by your income while you were waiting for bills. When you're talking about 'just paying extra principal', most people don't have the money for that, as I said, AND doing that won't hold your mortgage balance down temporarily while you wait for bills.

People don't realize it, but you pay your mortgage based on the average daily balance. The problem is that you can't put all of your income toward your mortgage to hold your ADB down and then get it back out to pay your bills. That's why you use a HELOC to accomplish the same thing. You sort of "install" this small portion of your mortgage that you CAN put all your money toward and then get it back when you need it. And whatever is left over automatically stays on the mortgage every month, so it works both ways. If your car breaks down or whatever maybe your balance doesn't go down that month, but you'll always be in a better position than if your money was sitting in a checking account doing nothing. And remember, all of this is going on while you're still paying your regular mortgage payments, but because you paid early principal your principal / interest ratio next month goes from $172.03/$249.57 to $197.03/$224.57 and your regular payments are putting more toward principal, too. Every month you're able to keep $25 more dollars in your pocket instead of spending it to interest and you've shortened your mortgage by years just by changing the way you pay.

So, look. I'm the case study and I'm telling you flat out that even at 8% or whatever my crappy rate is, I STILL only pay $1000/year ($83/month) to do this whole thing and I'm not even great at it. But this is why I've been telling you to focus on the cost vs return - imagine someone wanted to give you $13K (lottery, gift, whatever), but you had to buy a $1000 plane ticket to go pick it up. Would you turn it down because there's a cost involved? No, any idiot can see that it's well worth the $1000 plane ticket to go get 13x that much. That's what I'm doing here. I'm paying about $1000 each year to put around an extra $20K/year on my mortgage, which saves me a ton on interest. In your example, it's the $13K savings, but my mortgage is over twice that large at this point, so my savings probably dwarf that and I'm also shortening my mortgage by years. The cost of the HELOC is more than covered by what I'm saving, that's why it's a non-issue. Of course if I was just taking a portion of my mortgage and putting it on a HELOC and letting it sit there, then you can assume I'm just paying more interest toward the HELOC than I would have toward the mortgage, but that's not what we're talking about. The bottom line is that I'm saving a ton of money by keeping all of my income focused on my mortgage and it costs me $83/month to do it. I know people that spend that on getting their cars detailed. It's nothing compared to what I'm saving. This makes more sense, right?

Originally posted by @Mike S.:

Originally posted by @Joshua S.:

Let me present it in another way as obviously I didn't make my message clear.

Let's put the following scenario:

$100k mortgage, 3%, amortized over 30 years. (monthly payment: $421.60)

HELOC, $10k, 4%

Case 1:

Normal amortization of the mortgage without any additional principal payment and no use of the HELOC.

At the end of year 1 your mortgage principal will be down to $97,912 and you would have paid during the year $5,059.25 consisting of $2,087 of principal and $2971 of interest.

payment principal interest balance
1 ($171.60) ($250.00) $99,828.40
2 ($172.03) ($249.57) $99,656.36
3 ($172.46) ($249.14) $99,483.90
4 ($172.89) ($248.71) $99,311.01
5 ($173.33) ($248.28) $99,137.68
6 ($173.76) ($247.84) $98,963.92
7 ($174.19) ($247.41) $98,789.72
8 ($174.63) ($246.97) $98,615.10
9 ($175.07) ($246.54) $98,440.03
10 ($175.50) ($246.10) $98,264.52
11 ($175.94) ($245.66) $98,088.58
12 ($176.38) ($245.22) $97,912.20
($2,087.80) ($2,971.45) ($5,059.25)

Case 2:

Your scenario, taking a 10k HELOC loan, that will be payed back in one year. The HELOC is used to pay the balance down of the mortgage to 90k.

With this scenario, the balance of the mortgage at the end of the year will be $87,608 and you would have payed $2,391 +10,000 of principal and only $2,667 of interest.

However at the same time, you would have paid back $10,000 of principal of your HELOC and $216 of interest.

So, out of pocket you would have to pay $15,275 that year.

mortgage HELOC
payment principal interest balance principal interest balance
1 ($196.60) ($225.00) $89,803.40 ($833.33) ($33.33) $9,166.67
2 ($197.09) ($224.51) $89,606.31 ($833.33) ($30.56) $8,333.33
3 ($197.58) ($224.02) $89,408.72 ($833.33) ($27.78) $7,500.00
4 ($198.08) ($223.52) $89,210.65 ($833.33) ($25.00) $6,666.67
5 ($198.57) ($223.03) $89,012.07 ($833.33) ($22.22) $5,833.33
6 ($199.07) ($222.53) $88,813.00 ($833.33) ($19.44) $5,000.00
7 ($199.57) ($222.03) $88,613.44 ($833.33) ($16.67) $4,166.67
8 ($200.07) ($221.53) $88,413.37 ($833.33) ($13.89) $3,333.33
9 ($200.57) ($221.03) $88,212.80 ($833.33) ($11.11) $2,500.00
10 ($201.07) ($220.53) $88,011.73 ($833.33) ($8.33) $1,666.67
11 ($201.57) ($220.03) $87,810.16 ($833.33) ($5.56) $833.33
12 ($202.07) ($219.53) $87,608.09 ($833.33) ($2.78) $0.00
($2,391.91) ($2,667.29) ($10,000.00) ($216.67) ($15,275.87)

Case 3:

Instead of using the HELOC, you use the same $15,275 than in scenario 2, but you use it spread over 12 months to make additional payment to your mortgage.

At the end of the year you mortgage balance will be $87,555. Better than in case 2.

payment principal interest balance
1 ($1,022.89) ($250.00) $98,977.11
2 ($1,025.45) ($247.44) $97,951.66
3 ($1,028.01) ($244.88) $96,923.65
4 ($1,030.58) ($242.31) $95,893.07
5 ($1,033.16) ($239.73) $94,859.91
6 ($1,035.74) ($237.15) $93,824.17
7 ($1,038.33) ($234.56) $92,785.84
8 ($1,040.93) ($231.96) $91,744.92
9 ($1,043.53) ($229.36) $90,701.39
10 ($1,046.14) ($226.75) $89,655.25
11 ($1,048.75) ($224.14) $88,606.50
12 ($1,051.37) ($221.52) $87,555.13
($12,444.87) ($2,829.81) ($15,274.68)

Sorry, Mike. I know all this, but you're not looking at the total cost, which is more important.

1. Just paying extra principal is not part of the discussion. Most people don't have a ton of extra money lying around - they are looking for other ways to go about things. This strategy works for someone who has very little disposable income. Simply paying additional principal does not. Most people don't even have $400 saved up for an emergency, so they aren't paying extra principal, but that CAN do this strategy without an extra outlay because they're simply shifting debt from one place to another and paying it differently.

2. Total interest charges paying off the $10K on the bank's schedule: $13K over 5 years.

3. Total interest charges paying off the $10K on the HELOC: $1K over 1 year.

That's it. Those are the real world facts in this scenario that matter, not what rate you're paying and so on. You're not talking apples to apples. Line up your mortgage numbers on an amortization calculator and put in an extra $10K payment and see how much interest it would save you. Then calculate how much it would cost you to pay off on a HELOC where all of your income goes toward it. Those are the only two numbers that matter - how much you save and how much it costs to do it. Unless you want to talk apples, you might as well tell me who your favorite girl bands are, because we're having two different discussions. I always liked The Breeders.

Originally posted by @Chris John:

@Joshua S.

"I mean, no offense, but doesn't that sound stupid now? Most people don't have that lying around. But this strategy CREATES EXTRA MONEY THROUGH INTEREST SAVINGS.

The whole misunderstanding people have comes from the fact that they can't understand that moving some of your mortgage balance to the HELOC helps you SKIP interest on the mortgage."

The same argument could be made to you.  Have your paycheck direct deposited into a mutual fund so it gets to work immediately.  Pay your bills out of the mutual fund.  11% average in the mutual fund > saving 3% interest on your mortgage.  When you have enough money in your mutual fund, pay off your loan.  It'll happen a helluva lot faster than velocity banking.  Also, liquidity.  However, when you can do that, you won't.  Why?  You'll realize how much faster your money grows at 11%.  You'll borrow what equity you do have in your house and invest it.

It's just as easy (if not easier) to open a mutual fund than a HELOC. Also, in both examples, you don't need 10k to make a decision with.

I mean, no offense, but doesn't YOUR argument sound stupid now?  By the way, your attitude and the way you communicate with people is something to behold.

PS.  I think I might set that up with my mutual fund, so thanks for the idea!

Good luck with that. At some point you'll find out that you can't live in a mutual fund which is a pretty funny thought, so I hope you do it. You and the wife still paying on the house in 25 years calling your broker to see if you can retire and move into the mutual fund. Ah, I slay me! Anyway, once again, it's not about where to invest your money for a 3% or an 11% return. You think that's the discussion, but it's not. As I illustrated to the other gentleman - using his example of a $100K loan at 3%, you actually pay $13K worth of interest as you pay down your initial $10K. That's 130% interest when you work out your ACTUAL cost. Not per year, obviously, but it takes just under 5 years and you pay 130% interest in total to pay down that $10K if you do it on the bank's schedule.

So, since you guys are all about investments and that's the only thing you are willing to compare this to, let's do it! When you put that $10K into your mutual fund you'll end up with $16,850 (your initial $10K + $6850) after 5 years at 11%. Not bad - a 68.5% total return over that time. Let's see how I did. 

When I put the $10K into my mortgage I end up with $23K (my initial $10K + $13K interest savings). So, I ended up with that 130% return I talked about. That's obviously almost double your return, but that's not all:

1. I leveraged debt in the HELOC to make this happen and you were using your paychecks, which is obviously less efficient. Notice I didn't TAKE ON MORE DEBT, I simply moved debt from one vehicle to another and leveraged a different payment method to get my savings.

2. You have to hope for 11% and my return is automatic and locked in, because it's savings on interest that's already scheduled. Obviously, the risk might be worth it if you were getting a better return, but I already showed that you didn't.

3. Your money had to work for 5 years to make that return happen and my money immediately saved me the $13K when I skipped over those payments on my mortgage. And over the next 5 years - because I'm making the same regular monthly payments either way, that $13K that I saved on interest is now going toward my principal earlier than it would have, which saves me even more money. 

4. The money I'm paying to my mortgage was going there, anyway, so I'm really not even making an investment, I'm just changing the timing of my payments. So, you took on risk to get your returns and I didn't but still had a greater return. In other words, my "returns" are really just $13K worth of free money for flipping a couple switches and paying in a different way. You can't beat that no matter what your return is, because you're using capital and taking on risk. PS - I'm totally liquid, btw. I have a HELOC, so when I want money out of my house I just take it out.

Anyway, sorry if I hurt your feelings or anything, but it's a bit annoying to try to help people and have them bash you and refuse to listen, so I get a little carried away sometimes. It's astounding, the closed-mindedness that people exhibit, especially on an "Innovative Strategies" forum, so it gets a little frustrating, but I'm sorry if I was rude or anything. You can just chalk it up to passion, I don't mean it personally against you. To answer your question, though, no my argument doesn't sound stupid at all. There are probably benefits or aspects of the strategy that I haven't even thought of yet and buying a mutual fund is so basic that it's hard to believe I'm comparing the two. I'm honestly only doing it, because people refuse to see this strategy for what it really is, but when you compare it to a typical investment it actually makes me feel guilty about how much better it is. I think that's why I speak out about it so much, I feel a kid with his hand in the cookie jar and I'm trying to share the wealth or whatever. You should take a look at the screen shots I posted if you haven't already - I've put an extra $58K on my mortgage over the last three years doing this and there's no way you could put that amount toward a mutual fund. According to the bankrate calculator I posted earlier that $58K extra toward my $315K loan, it's saving me around $100K in interest, which is hard to believe. Anyway, good luck with the mutual fund if you go that way. :)

Originally posted by @Mike S.:

Let's make it clear.

The difference between a $100k or $90k balance in your mortgage principal is $10k.
If your mortgage rate is 3% with a balance of $100k you will pay $3k of interest that year. If you had only $90k balance you would pay $2.7k of interest. The difference is $300. $300 is also 3% of 10k.


Now if you use your HELOC to get this $10k, but your HELOC is 4%. You will pay $400 interest in your HELOC to pay your mortgage down and save $300 in interest. So yes it is negative arbitrage. But because you are still paying the same payment each month to your mortgage, you will pay your principal down a little bit more because the portion of interest vs principal has changed. But that additional amount is not magically appearing, it is just a shift from one pocket to the other. You are forcing yourself to save more because not only you are paying the same mortgage payment as before, but now in addition you are paying the interest of the HELOC on top of it. That is what is making the difference and eventually pays your principal down (with the penalty of the negative arbitrage).

Instead of paying that $400 HELOC interest, you would have used that additional money to add to your mortgage payment, you would get a better result eventually.

Many gurus are trying to explain that because you are paying more
interest in the first years of your mortgage it is at the bank's
advantage. It is not. You are paying the same exact rate of interest
each year based on your outstanding balance. If I could find a 30 years
mortgage at 2.75% interest only, I would jump on it as I don't mind not
paying any principal back at all as the equity in the home is frozen
money that I can't use unless I am doing a cash out refi or getting a
second position HELOC.


I repeat that for people who have problem managing money, velocity banking is a good script to follow to keep them in check. But if you are financially savvy, you may loose money due to negative arbitrage, and it can put you in a dangerous situation if your bank freeze your HELOC has you would have less reserve available.

Well, maybe you're done talking now, but hopefully you get it. I think the problem is that people think the $10K is just costing them "3%". The thing is, you're also paying interest on the entire loan balance, so it's costing you way more time and money that that. If you look at the amo table in your example you see that it takes 54 months (almost 5 years!) to pay the $10K down by the bank's schedule and that costs you an average of $238/month for a total of $13K.

In other words, you're paying off that $10K around Sept of 2025 after paying $13K worth of interest charges to get there, which is 130% interest when you look at your actual cost. I can pay off the $10K in between 6-10 months for less than $1000 on my HELOC. The difference is that I'm skipping over those amortized interest payments by giving the bank's money back sooner, so I'm annihilating. Every month I'm putting all my cash flow against that $10K to bring it down asap. Again, yeah, if you have $10K extra lying around every year then you could get similar results, but you might as well wish for a pony. Most people don't have the money lying around, which is why we're hacking and thinking outside the box in the first place.

Originally posted by @Mike S.:

Let's make it clear.

The difference between a $100k or $90k balance in your mortgage principal is $10k.
If your mortgage rate is 3% with a balance of $100k you will pay $3k of interest that year. If you had only $90k balance you would pay $2.7k of interest. The difference is $300. $300 is also 3% of 10k.


Now if you use your HELOC to get this $10k, but your HELOC is 4%. You will pay $400 interest in your HELOC to pay your mortgage down and save $300 in interest. So yes it is negative arbitrage. But because you are still paying the same payment each month to your mortgage, you will pay your principal down a little bit more because the portion of interest vs principal has changed. But that additional amount is not magically appearing, it is just a shift from one pocket to the other. You are forcing yourself to save more because not only you are paying the same mortgage payment as before, but now in addition you are paying the interest of the HELOC on top of it. That is what is making the difference and eventually pays your principal down (with the penalty of the negative arbitrage).

Instead of paying that $400 HELOC interest, you would have used that additional money to add to your mortgage payment, you would get a better result eventually.

Many gurus are trying to explain that because you are paying more
interest in the first years of your mortgage it is at the bank's
advantage. It is not. You are paying the same exact rate of interest
each year based on your outstanding balance. If I could find a 30 years
mortgage at 2.75% interest only, I would jump on it as I don't mind not
paying any principal back at all as the equity in the home is frozen
money that I can't use unless I am doing a cash out refi or getting a
second position HELOC.


I repeat that for people who have problem managing money, velocity banking is a good script to follow to keep them in check. But if you are financially savvy, you may loose money due to negative arbitrage, and it can put you in a dangerous situation if your bank freeze your HELOC has you would have less reserve available.

Yes, I understand how the math works out, but this will make it even simpler. 

When I put in an additional principal payment of $10K into your example, it shows just under $13K in interest savings. That's if I do nothing else, but since I'm making the same payments either way, that's also $13K that will go toward my principal faster than before, which accelerates the pay down faster and so on. You can think of it like a snowball effect. 

You're saying that because I pay around $1000/year ($83/month) to run the strategy, that cancels out my $13K savings? 

Originally posted by @Mike S.:
Originally posted by @Joshua S.:

When I'm talking about using a HELOC to pay the mortgage, the answer isn't - "Well, why don't you just pay your mortgage down with all the extra tens of thousands of dollars you have lying around that you aren't using for something else?". I mean, no offense, but doesn't that sound stupid now? Most people don't have that lying around. But this strategy CREATES EXTRA MONEY THROUGH INTEREST SAVINGS.


You are saving interest if your HELOC interest is lower than your mortgage interest. If the HELOC interest is higher you are not saving money at all, you are paying more interest.

The only point of velocity banking is that instead of keeping some money idling in your bank account for a few days or week, you put everything back into the HELOC and use it as a bank account to withdraw money when you need it. Indeed the compounding effect of never having anything idling in your bank account can be powerful. However, be mindful that line of credit can be shut down or frozen by the bank for any reason. If you lose your job, get into a financial problem that your bank learn about, bank will cut you off your HELOC lifeline in a snap and you will not have anything left to recover as all your money will be stuck into your home principal. You still need to have a minimum cushion into your bank and/or savings account for these situations.

As I wrote earlier, velocity banking is a system that can be helpful for people who don't know how to manage their money and are prone to overspend. It will give them a frame on how to it. If you are budget conscious and keep track of your expenses, it will not add any value and can even be riskier and more expensive as the rate arbitrage between HELOC and mortgage is not in your favor.

Sorry, but I don't know how to make it any clearer, so maybe pictures will help. :) As you can see from my amortization schedule as of January I should be at a balance of $287K and as you can see from my corresponding statement I'm at a balance of $229K. That's a difference of about $58K (and I have more to put on there soon, but I have been waiting to see what will happen with my taxes). We bought the house in the summer of 2016, started the strategy in May of 2018. I guess you have to take me on my word that I haven't had $20K extra per year for these last 3 years lying around to put on the mortgage, but it's the truth and.... you know.... pretty believable. If you notice, I'm paying almost $200 less in interest per month ($700 vs $900) than I should be according to my amortization schedule. That's not magic. Since I'm paying them back early using the HELOC my principal / interest ratio is skewing in my favor. A couple more years and I'll be at the tipping point where I'm paying more to principal each month and then I'll REALLY take off. Normally it would take about 13 years to get to that point and I'm not skipping lattes or anything, it's just a more efficient way to pay.

The whole thing has nothing to do with arbitrage or rates. If someone handed you $50K tomorrow and you put it on your mortgage, you skip down to that point in your amortization table on your next payment. That means that all of the corresponding interest that you would have paid (ie. for all those months you skipped), you saved that amount on interest. Again, that's the same whether you use a HELOC to do it or lottery winnings or whatever. I'm giving my mortgage lender the money early, so I'm skipping the corresponding interest payments ($917.94 + $916.25 + $914.56, etc. in that middle column there), which saves me tens of thousands of dollars. The whole thing "costs" me about about $1000/year in interest on the HELOC and I actually have a crappy rate as you can see below. The "cost" of my $1K in HELOC interest is obviously covered by my savings, so net net I come out way ahead. If you find yourself struggling with this idea, just do it yourself. Go to this bankrate calculator and plug in your numbers and add in an extra $20K principal payment for your first year and see how much you'd save on interest. When I put the $20K in the interest jumps down about $40K. Now ask yourself if paying $1000 to get that savings would be worth it. You ever pay extra to insulate your house better so you can save on heating costs or anything? Same idea. Once again, NOT doing any scrimping and saving or doing any voodoo, it's just the effect of skipping over interest payments they can't charge you for, because you gave the money back early. Hope this helps.

https://www.bankrate.com/calcu...