@Vinh Huynh
My input probably won't mean much, as I'm not a vet like a lot of you guys. I just started buying property about 2 years ago. But I'd still like to put in my 2 cents because I want to learn and receive feedback for investors on the "appreciation" side of the fence. Im going to sum things up to keep it simple! So, you purchased a $500k rental and have negative cash flow.
For the money you spent here, you could have purchased 10 cash flowing rentals in certain markets. At 3% appreciation, in 30 years you can sell out for about $950k. Right? And without capex, vacancies, etc. You lost about $100k in negative cash flow. Now back to the small portfolio of 10 properties. Let's assume 0 appreciation takes place over the course of 30 years. I could sell for $500k. Now, I cash flowed $30k a year off of these properties. That's $900k added onto the $500k, assuming I never spent any of the cash flow. Also, I know we aren't looking at CapEx, Vacancy, Etc.
We would be closer to $40k+ year in cash flow but I just took it down to $30k for a better example. $1.4M vs $850k. And I didn't count any miscellaneous expenses for you. One month vacancy per every 12 months would set you back $70k+over the course of the loan.
I don't see why people invest in negative cash flow properties, but I would love for someone to explain it to me! I'm here to learn.