Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Joseph Escamilla

Joseph Escamilla has started 8 posts and replied 33 times.

Post: Broker not showing my home to buyers unless I sign an agreement

Joseph Escamilla
Posted
  • Lender
  • Charleston, SC
  • Posts 34
  • Votes 11
Quote from @Bob Stevens:
Quote from @Joseph Escamilla:

Hey everyone - I currently have my primary home listed FSBO. I had 2 open houses this weekend, got a ton of interest and even a full price offer.

Of course I keep getting calls from Agents telling me they "have buyers interested in my property", but when they show up to look at the house it just ends up being them trying to pitch me to let them list my house. It is what it is - annoying but of course I have to respect the hustle. 

One Broker in particular is telling me that they have preapproved buyers and that I can remain a FSBO as long as I sign an agreement with them stating their buyer will pay them a separate commission and I pay them nothing.

This seems sketchy to me since I am already offering 2% buyer's agent fee. If you have buyers why wouldn't you just bring them to my property and try to get the 2% commission? Their response to that is "Oh well because then my buyer may go to you directly behind my back" . In my eyes that has nothing to do with me that has to do with your agreement with your buyer - I have had plenty of agents show up with their buyers and make offers.

The strangest thing is I lookup this guy's reviews and they are mostly positive! So I'm wondering if this is really too good to be true or if I am missing out on a decent deal? 

For reference I have attached their flyer they sent me. 

Ignore brokers. You say you already have offers so move forward. If a realtor has a buyer, tell them sure bring them, IF THAT ONE buys then I will pay your fee. But I am not giving you a listing agreement.  Funny I just noticed the card, that's my cousin. I Jjust called him , he said he has no idea which property this is for, maybe someone that works for him, small world 


 wow such a small world! and thanks for the advice 

Post: Broker not showing my home to buyers unless I sign an agreement

Joseph Escamilla
Posted
  • Lender
  • Charleston, SC
  • Posts 34
  • Votes 11
Quote from @Caleb Brown:

For FSBO as an agent we do have to have a form signed prior to viewing showing who pays the commission, protects the agent. On the buyer side if I was the agent I'd have them a buyer agency to protect myself. On the form though they should just put you would pay him 2%, I don't understand his thought process there.


 I understand on the contract or at least on the offer letter it definitely needs to be clear who is paying the fee. But before even showing the house? 

Post: Broker not showing my home to buyers unless I sign an agreement

Joseph Escamilla
Posted
  • Lender
  • Charleston, SC
  • Posts 34
  • Votes 11

Hey everyone - I currently have my primary home listed FSBO. I had 2 open houses this weekend, got a ton of interest and even a full price offer.

Of course I keep getting calls from Agents telling me they "have buyers interested in my property", but when they show up to look at the house it just ends up being them trying to pitch me to let them list my house. It is what it is - annoying but of course I have to respect the hustle. 

One Broker in particular is telling me that they have preapproved buyers and that I can remain a FSBO as long as I sign an agreement with them stating their buyer will pay them a separate commission and I pay them nothing.

This seems sketchy to me since I am already offering 2% buyer's agent fee. If you have buyers why wouldn't you just bring them to my property and try to get the 2% commission? Their response to that is "Oh well because then my buyer may go to you directly behind my back" . In my eyes that has nothing to do with me that has to do with your agreement with your buyer - I have had plenty of agents show up with their buyers and make offers.

The strangest thing is I lookup this guy's reviews and they are mostly positive! So I'm wondering if this is really too good to be true or if I am missing out on a decent deal? 

For reference I have attached their flyer they sent me. 

Post: Insurance when Rehabbing

Joseph Escamilla
Posted
  • Lender
  • Charleston, SC
  • Posts 34
  • Votes 11
Quote from @John Mocker:

Joseph,

At Closing you will want to have a Renovation Builders Risk policy and a Liability policy (if it is not part of the Reno Builder Risk).  The Builders Risk will cover the existing structure (most likely valued at the depreciated value) and the renovations that will be put in (usually at the Replacemement Value).  There are perils that could cause a loss that have nothing to do with the Contractor's Insurance.  Suppose lightening hits the house and causes a fire.  The contractor is not liable for that most likely so you would have an uncovered claim. 

You still want to get proof of insurance from all contractors you hire and have a written contract with them.  It is often recommended that you have them name you as an additional insured on their policy for the Liability coverage.  That, in my opinion, is not a replacement for you carrying Liability coverage yourself. 


 Thank you John! In your example you mention that if lightning hits the house and causes a fire then of course the builder is not liable for that. But wouldn't any regular insurance policy already cover that ? Or would it be an uncovered claim due to the fact that the lightning hit the property DURING the rehab? not sure if my question makes sense 

Post: Insurance when Rehabbing

Joseph Escamilla
Posted
  • Lender
  • Charleston, SC
  • Posts 34
  • Votes 11

A friend and I are under contract to purchase a property in the Poconos. The primary use will be as a Vacation home for our families to use with the potential to list it as a vacation rental in the future.  We are getting conflicting ideas from different insurance agents and not sure which route to take. 

Since we are rehabbing the property once we close one insurance agent is recommending we get a "Builder's Risk" Policy. The other agent doesn't think we need a Builder's Risk policy they are telling us that as long as the contractor provides us with a Certificate of Insurance and adds us as an additional insured party, then we are protected from anything going wrong during the rehab such as a worker getting hurt or any damage done to the property.

We really just want to make sure we aren't exposing ourselves to future issues/ lawsuits. Obviously every policy will be different but can someone please answer any or all of the following questions below?: 

-What would be covered/not covered for Builder's Risk Policy vs the contractor's COI? 

-If we decided to not go with builder's risk what are exposing ourselves to? 

-Would a contractor ever add us as additional insured? and would they even need to? 

-Would it make sense to just get a builder's risk policy while we are rehabbing and then changing to a regular policy once rehab is done? 

-Anything else to keep in mind? 

THANK YOU!!

Post: Utilities when Marketing Rental -HELP!

Joseph Escamilla
Posted
  • Lender
  • Charleston, SC
  • Posts 34
  • Votes 11
Quote from @Karla Simmons:

@Joseph Escamilla

Not sure about your state, but in California it’s perfectly fine to list it the way you want to just it as long as you are clear in your ad and in your lease. And also tell the new tenants when you have chosen them since they usually don’t pay attention to the details of the ad. I personally would do it the way you are wanting to do it because of the filtering aspect.


 Thank you Karla! great to hear someone else agrees on this 

Post: Utilities when Marketing Rental -HELP!

Joseph Escamilla
Posted
  • Lender
  • Charleston, SC
  • Posts 34
  • Votes 11
Quote from @Nathan Gesner:

HOW TO SHARE UTILITIES 101

You have a property with two or more units and the utility meters are shared. There are a few options.

1. Pay to separately meter the utility. This can be very expensive and is usually the worst choice to make because you can't justify the cost.

2. Charge the tenants a higher rent rate and include utilities with their rent. This is the simplest method, but it also means your tenants are more likely to abuse the utilities by leaving windows open with the heat or A/C running, leaving lights on, ignoring the toilet that constantly flushes on its own, etc.

3. Pay the bill yourself, then reimburse yourself by charging the tenants based on a formula. This takes a little more work, but it's the most fair and reduces the likelihood of tenants that squander utilities.

If you choose #2 or #3, there are considerations:

Start with an average. Use varies throughout the year. Heating costs go up in winter, as does electric due to the reduced natural light and people being indoors more. Electric can also spike in the summer with A/C. Contact the utility provider and get an historical average based on the last year of use. It won't be 100% accurate, but it will be close enough. I recommend you do this each year to adjust for utility increases and other variables. If your average heating bill is $150, you may not collect enough in the winter months when the bill reaches $225 but you'll collect extra in the summer when it drops to $65. If you base your tenant charges on the historical average, you should come very close to collecting the entire amount over a one-year period.

Charge a higher rate. If the water bill is $100 a month, increase the price by 20% (or whatever you decide is fair) to compensate you for the time required to split and bill and to cover additional use when tenants squander the utility. If the bill is $100 a month split between four units, increase it to $120 and charge each tenant $30.

How to calculate charges. Don't make it harder than it has to be. If you have four 2bed/1bath units with the same appliances, split it four ways and call it a day. You can make minor adjustments based on the type of appliances (dishwasher, clothes washer and dryer, air conditioning, etc.) and the size of the rental. If Apartment A is a 2bed/1bath with washer/dryer and Apartment B is a 1bed/1bath with no washer/dryer, Apartment A should pay a higher rate. Another option is to split the cost based on the number of occupants in each unit but this also means you'll need to adjust the charges as tenants move in/out, so it requires more work and I wouldn't recommend it. I recommend a simple spreadsheet to check your math and it will make it simple to adjust each year.

End the complaints. Tenants may complain about your method of calculating how much each unit pays. They think it's unfair because they only shower once a week but they can hear the upstairs neighbor showering twice a day. You can put an end to this by showing them an actual utility bill. Why? Because a large percentage of the charges are base fees that do not change based on use!

I just looked at a utility bill and it has a total charge of $184.12 but $116.50 is from base fees! If I divide this bill by four units, each tenant would pay $46.03. If they were separately metered, each tenant would pay the $116.50 base fees and their individual use, which would be 3x higher than what they pay when sharing a meter.

There are a lot of options out there, but don't make it more complicated than it needs to be. Tenants actually save money when using a shared meter, so there's plenty of room for error when calculating how to distribute the charges.

wow amazing information thanks so much Nathan!! 

Post: Utilities when Marketing Rental -HELP!

Joseph Escamilla
Posted
  • Lender
  • Charleston, SC
  • Posts 34
  • Votes 11
Quote from @Will Gaston:

@Joseph Escamilla I 100% agree w/ you on the price filtering. I don't know about NY laws but don't believe that would be against any in SC. Put the utility info in the first sentence of the listing. To me this seems like full disclosure and good faith on your part.

Again, I don't know anything about your specific state laws but I personally wouldn't have any problem with it as long as you notified everyone up front. 

The one thing I might reconsider is the pricing of the flat fee. 

Could you not do it based on square footage? This seems like it would be the most fair.


 Thank you for the response Will! The property is actually in PA but I completely get and agree with what you are saying. If not against the state laws I think it is still in good faith that we are letting people know in the description. Not trying to mislead anyone just trying to get more eyes on the listing as you know. Great idea about the sq footage for utilities! 

Post: Utilities when Marketing Rental -HELP!

Joseph Escamilla
Posted
  • Lender
  • Charleston, SC
  • Posts 34
  • Votes 11
Quote from @Nathan Gesner:

You would have to check the laws to see if that's a requirement. I've done it both ways and tend to get a better response when rent and utility are listed separately. When you list for the total amount, people assume that's the rent rate and utilities will be in addition to that amount.


 Thanks for the response Nathan. Great to know that it's most likely not a universal truth and more likely state by state laws. I agree I think especially if nobody reads the description they will assume utilities are on top of that

Post: Utilities when Marketing Rental -HELP!

Joseph Escamilla
Posted
  • Lender
  • Charleston, SC
  • Posts 34
  • Votes 11
Quote from @Mike Davis:

@Joseph Escamilla this is on a different note, but still worth thinking about. You have a triplex, two tenants pay gas and one paying electric. In todays environment, those paying the gas price, might be getting shelled and paying the same rent the tenant with electricity. Also, tenants will talk.


 Thanks for the insight Mike.