Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Joseph Collins

Joseph Collins has started 4 posts and replied 19 times.

Post: Good 150K cash deal or bad cash deal

Joseph CollinsPosted
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
  • Posts 19
  • Votes 5
Originally posted by @John Teachout:

Unless the project comes in way under budget, you didn't buy the property cheap enough in my opinion. ie, there's not enough spread between the purchase+repair costs and the ARV. The short term loan terms are also risky as it's almost certain those interest rates will increase. Hope it all goes smoothly and works out for you.

 Thanks for your feedback. Worst case scenario it will be a good learning opportunity!

Post: Good 150K cash deal or bad cash deal

Joseph CollinsPosted
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
  • Posts 19
  • Votes 5
Originally posted by @Jamie Derasmo:

If you're going by traditional formulas, you overpaid for the property. (70% rule for Flip, 80% rule for BRRRR) However, that doesn't mean it's a deal that won't work for you. When you entered the deal, what were your goals? I know lenders who will do 75% LTV refi, make sure to shop around. I think you have some serious number crunching to do.

My reason for purchasing wasn't super calculated. The contractor I worked with started buying homes in the same area he was repairing rental properties, including my own. I asked him to let me know the next time he saw a property he thought was a good purchase. He recommended this one. My thought process was a) I could get something under valued due to Ida damage and b) even if I didn't know what to do with it right away, it would be an asset and I'd have a few months to decide what to do while I was getting it repaired. What I didn't even think about when I started the purchase process was how much the repairs would be. So I was a little taken aback at the 80 - 90K estimate but by then it was too late to get out of everything without making a big mess. The contractor's feedback was that the house is worth $280 (and he turned out to be correct), I could get it for $150K do repairs for about $85 and then sell. He was specifically thinking in terms of flipping.

My general (albiet inexperienced) impression is that if I'm looking to rent it and can do so, as long as I can get rents in excess of any monthly outlays of these loans, pre or post financing, then I'm staying ahead potentially indefinitely--this assuming I refinance into a single set rate. I believe interest rates are going up this year, but even if they go up to say 6% on a loan, that would come out to $1200 per month (and then I'd add insurance which may be high due to the flooding; so lets say 3K per year - so $250 a month + 3K per year in taxes) - if I rent it I'd need to budget for vacancy and repairs, tenants would pay for utilities, lawn care, it'd be about $1700 a month in costs for me minus let's say $2500, cashflowing around $800 per month.

From the math you provided and the two loans your repaying, you have a slim profit margin for a flip and you might be a little upside down if you choose to refinance and rent it out, depending on your monthly payments plus loan payments. It’s okay if cash flow isn’t ideal but do you expect appreciation in that market?

In the short term I'm not sure. It's in an area that was largely devistated by hurricane Ida so renting is getting unusually high rates right now as there are still not a lot of rentals available. I'm not sure how to gauge if the majority of residents plan to stay. I think a lot of them are still shell shocked and trying to get insurance money and repairs done to their regular homes and businesses.

I’d say to get your rent number more narrowed down now. $2000-$2500 is a big spread that a lender won’t be satisfied with. Figure out the real number. If you think you can get $2500, put in the upgrades necessary for that as long as they’re in budget. 

It's hard to get a good rental figure because nothing has rented in this specific area since 2018. It's a nice area for regular home owners, large homes, large yards and about a mile off from main thoroughfares. Back in 2018 the rentals ranged from $1700 to $2000 a month. So I am guestimating since inflation has gone up a good bit since then and because right now rental rates are up about 13% post Ida.  I'm counting on regular inflation from 2018 to 2022 and then the unusual 13% jump in rental rates due to Ida enabling (at least in the short term) the ability to get around $2500 for rent.

Use the calculator on this site to run both scenarios and be honest about your numbers. Does your construction loan come with a prepayment penalty? 

No prepayment penalty. I'll run the numbers using the link. Thank you.

Refinance: If you refinance for 70% that’s $196K or 75% is $210K, both scenarios are well under what you owe ($150K “heloc” + $90K rehab loan) I decided to use $90K as your Reno budget to stay in the high side of your estimate. So you’ll still be paying 3% of your heloc each month and will owe the full $150K (or other balance) at the end of those 10 years. I know you say your only $5200 out of pocket right now but that Heloc is still your money, just in equity form.

Very true. And having it tied up does restrict me a bit in terms of opportunity cost, but I wasn't really planning to buy anything else after this. I already have 3 doors and was hoping to make this be the final one if I keep it as rental. If I was able to make $30 - $40K as a flip, then I wanted to use that money to either pay down existing mortgages or invest in the market and just keep working toward my exit (aka early retirement) strategy.

Potential Flip numbers: $280K sale price - $150K heloc - $90k rehab loan - $20K (or more in closing costs/realtor fees) - $5218 monthly holding costs = roughly $15K profit. 

Bright side of these scenarios is you don’t have to repay the heloc and can use that money plus your profit for your new project. No good or bad deal, just what works for you!

This is a good point. My overall goal was to acquire one more property with the assumption that there was enough benefit in having that asset that I could ultimately make myself better off. I would consider myself still in the growth / asset accumulation phase. I have about 10 years before I'm ready to get out of the real estate side of things. It seemed like the low interest debt route using it as a rental is fine or if I just want to get out of the deal entirely, I can sell it and would still come out with several thousand dollars profit and could get rid of the outstanding debt. I know there's the liklihood of interest rates going up, but they aren't going to jump uo to double digits this year. 

I wasn't aware of was using that 70 - 80% offer formula and I wasn't thinking about the debt. I was just looking at the monthly outlay of cash, which didn't seem so bad as long as I was bringing enough in with this deal to cover it. Your point that it can still be good depending on goals and perspective is a viewpoint I appreciate!

Thank you for your feedback.

Post: Good 150K cash deal or bad cash deal

Joseph CollinsPosted
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
  • Posts 19
  • Votes 5

I made a cash purchase of a SF hurricane Ida damaged home. I'm in the middle of the flip. Looking for forum feedback to help me understand if I've made a mistake or am on the right path still.  All thoughts welcome, deets below:

House arv $280K; Purchased w/cash for $150K in Dec 2021; In Jan 2022 got a $125K 12 month interest only renovation loan then monthly p&i at 4.75% for 3 years due on the construction loan and then variable interest rate based on prime for the next 20 changing every 3 years depending on prime rate. The contractor and I expect the work to be $80-90K. We asked for $125K to try and stay under budget. Our anticipated timeline is less than 3 months to finish. I pay 4.75% on the interest as I draw toward the $125K so if I don't use the full $125K, I only pay interest or p&i (when p&i becomes due) on whatever I've used at that point. The loan turns into whatever amount I actually pay the contractors for the work.

I told a finance graduate investor friend I did this and they told me it was a terrible deal if I paid $150K of my own cash because the most a bank will give me to refi is 70% of the arv. This would mean I'm looking at a max refinance loan of $196K and from that comes $150K purchase price + $125K construction loan resulting in -$79000 from an investment standpoint. What I didn't tell him is that I borrowed the $150K at a 3% interest rate (let's say from a HELOC) and can pay interest-only on it until 10 years when whatever loan balance is left will be due.

With the construction loan, the first 12 months are interest only. So assuming the renovation finishes in 3 months and I can refinance with someone at the 6 month mark from when I started, I'm estimating being out of personal cash about $5218.75 total (that's $375.00 on the 3% loan interest x 6 months is 2250.00, plus 6 months of 4.75% 125K construction loan interest is 2968.75 for a total personal-out-of-pocket-cash total of $5218.75). There are also carrying costs, but in a 3 - 6 month period they would be $1K or less so I left that number out.


At that 6 month renovation completion point (which in reality it will very likely be a few months sooner than that), I can refinance the property and then rent it for about $2000 - $2500 per month (according to current comps for excellent condition houses in the same area) or sell it for the $280K (or a little less).

My two questions are a) is my friend right that it's awful if I actually used my personal cash and b) is it actually a very good play based on what I actually did?

Also, open to any thoughts on going forward from the point of construction work completion when the single family home will be habitable. I haven't decided for sure yet if I want to flip or rent it. I may flip since the area is clearly prone to flooding, but I would prefer to keep it as a rental and just deal with it. After having had to fix two other flooded Ida rental properties that I already owned, I'm not as afraid of that process as I would be had I not just gone through it.

Post: New Orleans Real Estate Meetup

Joseph CollinsPosted
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
  • Posts 19
  • Votes 5

I am very interested.  I also am very open to virtual meet ups (part of our new normal).  I'm a beginning not-a-jerk local to the NOLA area RE investor.

Post: Should you "buy" rental property cash flow

Joseph CollinsPosted
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
  • Posts 19
  • Votes 5
Originally posted by @Theresa Harris:

Call a few realtors and specifically ask for someone who works with investors.  Another option is call a property management company.  Some of them have people who are realtors and would have a better idea of what to look for and how much places would get in rent.  

Hi Theresa, followed your suggestion and found an agent that I think is an ideal fit, a local realtor who started as an investor and definitely understands my mindset.  Thank you for the suggestion. 

This forum is awesome!

Post: Should you "buy" rental property cash flow

Joseph CollinsPosted
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
  • Posts 19
  • Votes 5
Originally posted by @Ben Lapane:

@Joseph Collins

I would seek out whole sellers like New Western.

 Thank you for that tip!

Post: Should you "buy" rental property cash flow

Joseph CollinsPosted
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
  • Posts 19
  • Votes 5
Originally posted by @Joe Villeneuve:

My answer is accurate to your question.  I'm thinking you're not following the logic here.  The reason why you're NOT cash flowing positive, or as I referred to it as an "illusion", can be seen in the generic (but real world) example below. ( I have to assume the numbers here for negative CF if you put 20% down would be negative):

Assumptions

1 - Property PA = $100k
2 - 20% DP = $20k; debt for 30 years = $430/m...$5800/y +/-; CF = $300/m....$3600/y
3 - 25% DP = $25k; debt for 30 years = $400/m...$4800/y +/-; CF = $330/m....$4000/y
....Note:  This means you just spent $5000 to get $400/year, so it will take you 12.5 years to recover that extra cost.  If you stayed with the 20%, it will take you just over 5 years to recover the entire DP.

What if the property has negative CF at 20% DP:
1 - 20% DP = $20k; debt $5800/y; Negative CF = -50/m...-$400/y
2 - 25% DP = $25k; debt $4800/y; Cash Flow = $3600/y

...Note:  Negative CF is just bad.  It means every month/year you  are just adding to your cost for the property.  If you went to the higher DP (25%), you would increase your CF to $3600/year, but you would still be behind for 7 years, until you recovered all of your cost.  All you did was pay all your negative CF for 7 years up front.  Another way to see this is you spent $5k to get $40/month back...and you aren't making a profit until you've recovered ALL of your cost (cash...out of pocket).

Negative CF is not good.  Buying it up front isn't any better, maybe worse since you lose the potential of those extra funds if they were used on a different positive CF property.

OK, so you're saying higher DP results in a longer period of time to recoup the ROI, which is bad. That makes sense.


So in theory (and depending on actual numbers) forcing the cash flow could be worse that a straight out monthly negative cash flow because you'd have spent so much that you're that much further in the hole in relation to a break even ROI target than simply having a monthly negative cash flowing property in the beginning where you are negative but only by a small amount.

This fact just exacerbated my anxiety.

Post: Should you "buy" rental property cash flow

Joseph CollinsPosted
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
  • Posts 19
  • Votes 5
Originally posted by @Stephen Keighery:

It doesn't sound like you are getting the best response from agents and can do better. Braden Smith is a good one in GNO and is an investor himself and very knowledgeable. I also think you can get a lot of this information yourself. The Northshore REIA is staring in person again next week and I would attend that to meet some people. I know your market isn't the north shore but you will find plenty of south shore people and local knowledge. You are already going in the right direction so think you just need a few more local connections to push you forward.

 Thanks for this.  I send him a connect request here and will also try contacting him via phone.  I'd also like to connect irl with you, if that's OK.

Post: Should you "buy" rental property cash flow

Joseph CollinsPosted
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
  • Posts 19
  • Votes 5
Originally posted by @Marshall Lew:

@Joseph Collins

Jon V is correct on CF. Adding to your DP dilutes your ROI in most cases. I have a nice spreadsheet that will illustrate this for you. PM me if you want a copy. Happy to share.

I would like a copy.  How do I private message you?  lol

I just sent you a connection request.  Guess that is first...?

Post: Should you "buy" rental property cash flow

Joseph CollinsPosted
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
  • Posts 19
  • Votes 5
Originally posted by @Joe Villeneuve:

No.  Don't buy cash flow.  That increase in cash flow due to a higher DP% and lower mortgage % is an illusion...and working backwards.  When you buy a property, the only cost to you is what comes out of your pocket...which should be just the DP.  The goal is to recover all of your cost as soon as you can, because you don't start to make a profit until you do.  If you have negative CF, all that does is add to your cost, but you lose any and all returns so you end up going backwards as the property just keeps costing you more for every month you hold it with negative CF.  Here's where the illusion comes in.  When you increase your DP to counter the NCF, all you're doing is paying all that NCF up front.

As to the rest of your questions, most of them (if not all) have the answers buried in the questions...hidden in plain sight.  If you go back and read what you wrote, you'll see the answers are right there.  If you can't see them, PM me and I'll walk you through them.

 Hi Joe, thanks for your feedback.  The only thing I question is your logic about the "illusion."  Your comment implies I would put down a significant DP and then still be losing money after closing.  While I do consider myself a relative neophyte in terms of investing in real estate for profit (versus retroactively fixing purchases that weren't ideal initially), I do know enough to keep from putting down a big DP and then still losing money.  I was with you till the assumption that I would still have negative cash flow after the purchase.  

That's not going to happen regardless of which tactic I pursue.

My question is whether using a big DP as a tactic makes sense when one's strategy is to have a cash flowing property quickly.  One common and popular technique according to people online is find something that's depressed or that has a tax lien or some other way to avoid putting out a lot of money initially.  Notice I said money not work.  I don't feel experienced enough to use those methods and I'm not finding enough local support to help guide me through any of those.

So perhaps give your feedback after incorporating that assumption into your thoughts.  I can message you privately but I want to make sure you understand what I'm asking.  You can also message me privately now that I think / hope I've clarified what I'm asking.