Hey Everyone!
I'm Jose Alvarado, I live in San Francisco, and I'm a new member to BiggerPockets. I've been listening to the podcasts for a while now and I'm finally ready to take action. I just purchased the Pro Membership for the books and software. I believe I'm fairly knowledgeable in real estate after reading the following books but I know I don't know everything I need to before making my first purchase:
Read: Rich Dad Poor Dad by Robert Kyosaki
Read: Building Wealth One House at a Time by John Schaub
Read: The Richest Man In Babylon
Read: The Book on Rental Property Investing by Brandon Turner
Read: The Millionaire Real Estate Investor by Gary Keller
Reading: How to Invest in Real Estate with No Money Down by Brandon Turner
Going to read: A BiggerPockets Guide: How to Rent Your House by Brandon Turner
Going to read: The Book on Managing Rental Properties by Brandon Turner
I'm really interested in house-hacking in Oakland. I currently pay $1800 for rent in SF and after doing some research I could be paying ~$2200 if I purchased a home in Oakland. I would rather be putting down $2k a month in mortgage than paying rent, but my goal is to purchase a property to live in, rent the other rooms out, and produce cash-flow without paying any rent myself.
I spoke to Chase bank about a conventional loan and they provided the following results
"If you can come up with 5% down payment, we can finance up to $417,000 and with 10% down, we can finance up to $625,5000—both conventional financing with PMI (mortgage insurance)"
I also believe that I qualify for an FHA loan with 3.5% down. The mortgage banker said that I should "try with conventional first as sellers typically like to work with a more streamline financing."
Should I go with a conventional loan or an FHA loan? At the moment, I'm leaning towards getting a conventional loan with 5% down. I have enough for saved for 5%-10% down depending on the property but I'm hoping to put as little down as possible since I don't want to lose all of my savings and I'll need some extra funds to fix the property up and pay for vacancies while I transition from my current apartment to the new property.
Zack Karp recently made the following comment on a BiggerPockets forum, "Conventional is better than FHA if you have a 680+ credit score, as the blended rate and PMI cost is lower." So it looks like a conventional loan is the way to go unless someone call tell me otherwise.
I think I'm ready to start working with a real estate agent to find a property that fits my criteria. According to the banker, I can easily get pre-approved. Ideally, the property would be close to BART or MUNI so that I can get to work in SF easily. I see some great listings with 6+ beds in Zillow that seem like a great opportunity.
Is there any difference in purchasing a regular house, a house in auction, a foreclosure, or an apartment with a conventional loan?
Random question: Why are some houses with 4 or more beds listed as apartments?
Is there anything else I should do or have ready before I start looking for a property and real estate agent?
Some of the things I believe I still need to know:
- What areas to avoid in Oakland?
- Laws and regulations about owner-occupied rental properties in Oakland
- When to apply for pre-approval? Before or after I find a property?
I'm planning on contacting real estate agents this weekend so that I can start looking at some properties. If you're real a real estate agent in Oakland I would love to get in contact with you.
Thanks for the help!
Jose Alvarado