Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: John Woosteer

John Woosteer has started 1 posts and replied 1 times.

I had a thought why insurance carriers do not act as a real estate broker as well.  It seems like a great idea for new business because once you sell a home you can offer your insurance product.  Also, if a customer of your insurance needs to cancel their policy they can come straight to their insurance carrier to sell the house for them.  This seems like a great way for insurance carriers to add a division and expand their brand.  I understand there is some value for the agents that sell your insurance with real estates agents for referrals.  Is this the reason we do not see this because it would eliminate that relationship between real estate broker, insurance agents and carriers? Is there some legal conflict that makes this impossible?