Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: John Hammond

John Hammond has started 1 posts and replied 2 times.

So if there is an event that renders the land worthless I would lose all of the money I loaned?

For example the building and land wash into the ocean during a landslide.  The insurance will pay to rebuild the house, but the land will be underwater from here on out.  The borrower stops paying and the lender forecloses.  There is no possibility of building.  No one will buy the property, and the lender is out the money they loaned.

The lender would essentially be the only one losing money in this scenario.  If this is the case, I'm surprised banks would ever lend on cliff-side mansions in California.  Surely there has to be a system in place that they could get their money back?  

Sorry if these concepts are rudimentary.  I'm new to all of this so bear with me if there is something obvious that I'm unaware of.

We just closed last week. There was a section in the mortgage that states that the owner will have a policy that covers the "full insurable value" and a lot of other legal jargon.  The gist of the paragraph is that he needs to have enough insurance, and if I'm not okay with it, I can pay the difference and add that onto his loan at the highest interest rate allowed by law.

A couple days after closing they sent over the evidence of insurance document and the policy is covered for 275K less than the amount I loaned him.  I have heard mortgage companies requiring the borrower to be insured up to the amount of the loan, but I don't know what this looks like in practice.


Is he under insured?  I'm new to owner financing and I may be misunderstanding insurance policies from a lender's standpoint.  I wanted to consult you guys before speaking with an attorney.  Any advice is greatly appreciated.  Thanks!