Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Account Closed

Account Closed has started 12 posts and replied 576 times.

Post: Mortgages actually not in forbearance

Account ClosedPosted
  • Specialist
  • OverTheRainbow
  • Posts 607
  • Votes 909
Originally posted by @Russell Gronsky:

@John Farady exactly. Since the more cases you can show the government, the more bail out money you get?

Missed payments (forbearance) causes Govt planning and Fed interpretation both to be used as excuses to increase stimulus payments and then increase the already bloated budget. The worse you can make things look, the more congress "needs" to "help" us. It's in the interest of congress to give out lots of money in an election year.

Since two thirds of the unemployed are getting more on unemployment than they were getting when they were working, the forbearance option makes no sense from a practical point. What it does do is lead people to believe they don't have to make their mortgage payment and those missed payments will be forgiven. When I was buying pre-foreclosures a couple of decades ago, people were astonished that they had to repay their missed payments. It's as if they are thinking "since I didn't pay my mortgage and nothing has happened, I guess the bank has forgotten about those payments and I no longer owe it". Banks don't forget and they don't forgive. It affects your credit for 3 years and is a time bomb debt that will send a lot of folks into foreclosure. Those same people sure aren't saving the money from those missed payments, which is what they should be doing if they went the forbearance route. They will need it to save their house.

Post: Sewer Pipe Replacement Increase Home Value?

Account ClosedPosted
  • Specialist
  • OverTheRainbow
  • Posts 607
  • Votes 909
Originally posted by @Kyle Smith:

A duplex that I own is getting the entire sewer line replaced as the original line has failed. My question is will this increase the value of the property or is this going to be considered a sunk cost to just keep the property running?

My thought is tenants expect the sewer line to work. I'm not increasing the quality of life for my tenants but can't find any good information online in terms of the property value going up or remaining flat after the work is done.

Thanks for your feedback!

I had a line replaced once on a property and it didn't add value. People expect their toilets to flush properly. It might have kept the house from selling or the city could shut you down if you didn't have the work done, but that's about it.

Post: Mortgages actually not in forbearance

Account ClosedPosted
  • Specialist
  • OverTheRainbow
  • Posts 607
  • Votes 909
Originally posted by @Russell Gronsky:

When the forbearance announcement came from the Federal Government, I was curious about the details of how it worked. So I called several banks that hold mortgages for my residential rentals and asked how their programs worked.

To be clear, I didn’t ask for forbearance, I just asked about the details of how it works.

Earlier this week, I looked in my credit report and found that 2 of the banks I spoke with reported a note to the credit bureaus that my loans with them were in forbearance!

When I called the banks, customer service from both banks told me they automatically enroll people into forbearance right now, even if you just call to ask questions about the program.

Please look at your credit reports and make sure there aren’t notes on your loans from forbearance that you didn’t ask for.

 Crazy. Then that also means it skews the reports of the number of people asking for forbearance. 

Post: What's the least investors want to make on a flip?

Account ClosedPosted
  • Specialist
  • OverTheRainbow
  • Posts 607
  • Votes 909
Originally posted by @Alejandro Salcido:

@Jeffrey Daniels Thanks I have a potential deal, 130k asking price ARV 185k, about 15k in repairs. Numbers seemed kind of tight that's why I was asking how what's the least of profits a flipper would take.

I just finished and sold one off of Glendale and 23rd. I bought for $169,000 put $60,000 into it and sold for $325,000 without an agent. If I can't clear $50,000 in my pocket on a flip on a $275k - $300k project, then it probably isn't worth my time.

Post: Who do I sue first?

Account ClosedPosted
  • Specialist
  • OverTheRainbow
  • Posts 607
  • Votes 909
Originally posted by @Nat C.:

I purchased a property in Dade County in 2013. The property was on the same parcel as another condominium building.

The purchase contract stated this in the additional terms-

“Seller, as a condition subsequent to closing, shall remove and sever the subject properties from the condominium regime.”

When I recently went to sell the building, the buyers attorney informed me the land was never separated from the condominium with the city. Furthermore the city will not allow the separation as it would not meet their size and setback requirements. The buyer therefor backed out of the sale.

After extensive investigation, it was discovered that the sellers attorney executed the separation of the property with the county but not with the city.

The city will not issue any permits for work on the property unless it rejoins the condominium association.

Rejoining the condominium could trigger them to ask for backpay of 7 years HOA dues. It will also reduce the value of the building as it will be tied to a HOA and have ongoing fees payable.

I am trying to decide the best course of action forward.

1. Make a claim with the title insurance company because I feel they never should have issued title insurance on the property to begin with. I am unsure if I can make a valid claim and would value any feedback here.

2. Request the seller and his attorney hire a zoning attorney to battle with the city and obtain a variance to allow the plot to be legalised.

3. Sue the seller alleging they had an intention of fraud. I would argue they were aware the city would not allow the separation due to the size and setbacks, hence they sold the property and said the severance would be done after the sale. I am not sure how much I would try to claim in damages though?

I purchased the building for 80k. Funds spent over the years adds up to 40k.

The recent contract I had to sell the building was for 150k.

 You may have a statute of limitations issue. I would take out the title insurance, contact the title company and let them handle the front end. If they say too much time has passed (it may be limited to 3 years or 6 years depending on the statute) point out to them that the code probably says something like SOL begins "after discovery" and you just discovered it. If they refuse to go any further you contact a real estate attorney in the county that the property exists and have a consult.

You will need to take any written agreements you have, the title insurance paperwork, the letter from the county, the letter from the city, the work that the previous attorney did and the closing settlement. In this case I would probably get two different attorneys opinions. You would ask if they think you have a claim. You want to ask what their legal theory is regarding how they would approach the claim. You want to know how much they charge per hour, You ask how long it would take to litigate and what the projected cost would be to go to trial. You have to know "worst case scenario" to help figure out your options. And then you want to know what your chances of winning the case are, ask if he thought the other side would appeal, does he think they would be willing to settle, and does the winning side collect attorney fees.

That is the short answer.

Post: Steps to take after being accepted for a loan!

Account ClosedPosted
  • Specialist
  • OverTheRainbow
  • Posts 607
  • Votes 909
Originally posted by @Nathalie Reyes:

Good afternoon everyone!

Im currently creating my business plan for my first investment and I have doubts about how to proceed after being accepted for a loan. What's the best way to give the money to the seller and also what steps do I need to take finalize the deal? 

Thank you for your help!

If you use a real estate agent they do all of that for you. If you are asking those questions, you need a real estate agent. ;-)

Post: Subject To and Bankruptcy

Account ClosedPosted
  • Specialist
  • OverTheRainbow
  • Posts 607
  • Votes 909
Originally posted by @Jeff Cardello:

I am new to the Subject To strategy and have been attempting to gather as much information as possible.  Most of it seems pretty positive but I was warned that a property that I purchased could be seized by a court if the seller files bankruptcy.  

Is this true?

How do I mitigate this risk?

Thank You for your time!

 If title was properly transferred into your name you receive notice of the bankruptcy. The debtor ( as they call him in the process) has to list all debts he owes and all assets he owns. You as the actual owner won't be involved in the process. The bank will be notified that the debtor no longer owns the property. The bank then gets to choose whether they want to exercise the "Due on Sale" clause. If they exercise that option, you have to refinance, work out something with the bank or sell.

Post: Low CoC, but huge lot

Account ClosedPosted
  • Specialist
  • OverTheRainbow
  • Posts 607
  • Votes 909
Originally posted by @Seth Schnakenberg:

I may have to opportunity to purchase a 13,500 sq ft property in which a SFH sits on the north half and the south half is undeveloped. The home would have a CoC return of ~4.8% and is being looked at by many buyers. Not a very good CoC, but then there is this:

During this pandemic, I am having difficulties hearing back from the city as to whether or not the lot can be broken up into two separate parcels. Looking at adjacent houses, this property should have been broken up in the past but never was. The idea is to split the lot and build either a "shotgun" style duplex or a SFH once the funds to do so are available (a.k.a. many years in the future).

The dilemma is do I pull the trigger on this SFH (which will be my first investment property) that has a very low CoC return in hopes of being able to develop the other part of the land in the future. Or, do I keep scootin' down the road and hope something else pops up in this very tight, pandemic squeezed market?

I have nearly made up my mind on what to do. I just want people to give me the confidence to do something for this first investment property

 No. Of course, NO! If your experience in real estate is this rudimentary, first work with someone who can teach you the ropes. If you want more info direct message me so I can give you direction.

Post: Go Behind Seller's Back?

Account ClosedPosted
  • Specialist
  • OverTheRainbow
  • Posts 607
  • Votes 909
Originally posted by @Fekel Altimeaux Jr:

So this title is sort of click-baiting because i was looking for a quick response for a consensus.

I have a seller who've I've been going back and forth with since October 28th. It's a nice corner lot home that belongs to a late women's estate ran by her two sons. One son (S1) decided to occupy the home, has addiction problems, and the home has no electricity or running water. I spoke to him by approaching him. He told me he's ready to sell when his brother is ready to sell and he's the executor on the will. I got in contact with the brother (S2) and it's looking like that is NOT the case. At first, he lied and told me there was a third trustee who was halting the sale but after talking to him in December, he said he was waiting 'till his brother got on his feet. Early April, Put a bottle of sanitizing wipes and the door and told S1 to tell his brother. He thanked me and it was a good way in. Contacted him 3 weeks ago and he expressed disdain in his brother and how he was not motivated to leave (even though he says that's what he's waiting for). Told me he hadn't seen him and he'd go over there that weekend. I offered to go speak to his brother on the situation and how i can help by buying the home, he said he'd speak to him first. Waited until this past Sunday and told him i'd be across the street and if he'd like to meet at the home (to coax him into a showing), but he responded slightly aggravated with the last sentence being, "We have nothing to talk about until he leaves."

This home is in disrepair. S1 has a cat and a pet squirrel living with him. The garage is filled with cans and roaches, and the video I was shown has the home a mess. Beer cans, rotting Tostitos salsa on the counter, ALOT of misc trash. S2 said the smell was so unbearable he could only record the 2 minutes of footage he did inside the home and had to wash it off him when he got home. He wants to potentially charge him for backrent and delinquent taxes at closing (said he'd pay 2018 taxes, 2019 delinquent), but also considered fixing it up himself and living in it (how do i get him to think this is a bad idea?).

How can I help him? How can i get them to sell? This has been long-standing and he seems like an enabler. I was thinking about going to speak to S1 again and getting him on board and showing me the home so i can deal with this, but i also don't want to disrespect S2 by doing that. Any advice??

Just curious, is this a satire or do you not know when to spend your time looking for a real lead?

Post: Too "much" equity, unable to refinance

Account ClosedPosted
  • Specialist
  • OverTheRainbow
  • Posts 607
  • Votes 909
Originally posted by @David Hernandez:
Hello,

I started renting my house last year (as I moved back with my family) and I'm ready to purchase a second house. I saw a good deal, but the price is just a little bit too high for me to qualify (debt-to-income ratio).

Debts:     1) Car payment ($400)
              2) Mortgage ($807)

Income:   1) W-2 job (60k/yr)
              2) Rental ($1100)

I figured I could refinance my home to get a lower mortgage payment while lowering my interest rate (current rate=5%). The home is worth 200k and I only owe 35k, but banks tell me that is too low of an amount and I don't qualify for refinancing.

Can I pull out enough money from my equity on the mortgage and then refinance the whole debt? That would lower my payments and allow me to give a bigger down payment. I know that refinancing is a new mortgage under new terms, and that the lender pays the first mortgage off before giving me the new one. I'm confused as to where the money from my equity comes from. Is it a different loan than my mortgage? If it is can it be combined with my mortgage since I'd be borrowing from the same lender?

Refis with cash out are hard to find at the moment.  Normally, banks are looking for a Minimum amount of $50k to $75k for a loan. Their cost of doing the loan is such that anything less loses money. (They have people, processes, overhead) that costs them money. The fact that you are starting a new loan with the same lender generally is immaterial.They don't care. You may be a nice guy, but if you aren't making them money, you aren't THAT nice of a guy in their eyes. It's only business. The sooner you look at it the way the bank looks at it, the sooner you will understand and the sooner you will realize that you have to be strategic in your investing.

Oh, and I'd dump the car payment until you can pay cash. You are spending half of a monthly payment (of a house that appreciates) on a depreciating asset (a car), that's a bad move. Buy a car with cash ( a ford taurus) until you can buy the car you really want (a ferrari ), with cash. What do you care what the guys in the neighborhood think when you are on your way to becoming a millionaire and they are stuck with their sucking $12 an hour jobs?