Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: John Clark

John Clark has started 5 posts and replied 1332 times.

Post: City new water service lines

John Clark#3 Market Trends & Data ContributorPosted
  • Posts 1,361
  • Votes 1,095

I had the lead service line from the bbox into my house replaced in 2016 at a cost of about $9,000. To go from the bbox to the water main would have involved going across the street, and cost an additional $10,500, plus permit fees of about $3,000. The deposit that the plumber has to put down is substantial, and he doesn't get it back for years.

Eventually, I'll get the bbox to main service pipe replaced.

The whole problem is that the City REQUIRED the use of lead pipe up until 1986, even though the dangers of lead pipe have been known for centuries. It was a sop to the plumber's union, since lead is harder to work with than copper, and the plumber's union, for all its faults, does have a good training program. It meant more jobs for union plumbers (you can be a licensed plumber without being a union-trained plumber).

I wish the City would waive the permit fee. Inspect, sure, but free installation inspections is the least the City of Chicago could do after ignoring the health of its residents for so long.

"

For a point of information, is there anything that can be done if you believe that the selling agent did not present your offer? "

As an attorney, this is one of the reasons why I hate real estate agents. The real estate agent has a fiduciary duty to the owner to present ALL offers. Full stop. Period. No if, no ands, no buts. If you feel that the agent has not presented your offer to the owner, I would the offer directly to the owner. I you have evidence that the agent has not presented your offer, complain to the state regulators.

Oh, I second the opinion about dual agency being a conflict of interest.