I'm relatively young investor (30) working on putting my first rental property under contract. This community seems to have a fairly low view of stock market investing which is fine, but I thought the following comparisons really had some striking implications.
I'm working towards early retirement. I still have a day job with 401K been building a mutual fund portfolio, and because I'm also a real estate agent on the side I've been working my way closer and closer to my first rental property. Really have appreciated the free podcasts and forum as they have really helped me understand the benefits or real estate more. I run the numbers on early retirement quite often. One of the major variables in my calculation is rate of return. For example say you have 500K and your getting a 4% annual rate or return. So your nest egg is kicking off 20K a year. That 4% number is an age old 25:1 safe ratio often used for retirement figures. Note there are assumptions made even for the %4 but that is no the point of this post.
The point is as I run my numbers its really easy for me to think: I'm young I can afford to have my assets in a riskier class so really 8% ROR is reasonable so that is $40K. Yeah now I can retire that much sooner. Anyway I was dinking around with the numbers and looking at how a couple rental properties would aid in my ability to retire early and stumbled into this somewhat obvious but also obscure realization.
When looking at cash flow (which doesn't specifically need to come from rental property) although there will be a rate or return based on your cost to obtain and hold, there isn't an assumed rate of return based on stock market (economic market) conditions.
I know I'm rambling I promise I'm about to get to the point:
The realization was that cashflow is worth an ever increasing amount as your investment strategy becomes more conservative. Meaning the more conservative I want to be the bigger my nest egg needs to be. Yet the more conservative I want to be the larger the portion of my nest egg the cash flow effectively replaces.
The graph below shows 100K in income from investments at different rates of return. Note how as you become more conservative, (lower rate or return) that you need a large nest egg. At the same time the cash flow you already have effectively decreases the nest egg amount needed by an equivalent rate.
This was a quite a revelation to me as I want to make sure I'm being reasonable with my ROR expectation of my portfolio. Meaning I need more money to get to that early retirement number. At the same time the more conservative my estimations are the higher the effective replacement value of my cash flow is.
This was a light bulb moment for me. It may not be for you, but I thought I would share.
Its simple math:
$1 annual return means you need a nest egg of $12.50 @ 8% ROR.
$1 annual return means you need a nest egg of $25.00 @ 4% ROR.
$1 annual return means you need a nest egg of $50.00 @ 2% ROR.
Meaning that $1 in cashflow effectively replaces larger amounts of savings as you get more conservative.
Hope this helps someone else.