Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Joe Ludwiczak

Joe Ludwiczak has started 2 posts and replied 5 times.

Post: Discount tenant rent based on water damage in basement

Joe LudwiczakPosted
  • Fairfield, CT
  • Posts 5
  • Votes 1
Quote from @Chris Seveney:

@Joe Ludwiczak

This is a business decision. Have they asked for any type of discount ?

They haven’t but they’ve been good tenants so I want to do right by them. Just not sure if there is a standard approach in these situations. 

thanks @Chris Seveney!

Post: Discount tenant rent based on water damage in basement

Joe LudwiczakPosted
  • Fairfield, CT
  • Posts 5
  • Votes 1

I recently bought a new primary residence and kept my starter him as a rental. Things have been great but last month we had a burst pipe in the basement of the rental. The basement is half finished and the tenants kids use that part of the basement all the time. Based on the damage I need to replace the floor and it’s taking close to month to get it all done. During that time the tenants have been unable to use the basement. Is it appropriate to discount the rent for a month based on the loss of usable space? 

Post: 40% Down to ensure good cash flow?

Joe LudwiczakPosted
  • Fairfield, CT
  • Posts 5
  • Votes 1
Quote from @Alexander Murillo:

@Joe Ludwiczak obviously everyone is saying it's a bad idea, but I think in reality it's up to you and your goals. If you want to scale and grow your portfolio, don't put 40% down on one house. If debt gives you anxiety and your goal is just to pay off a couple strong properties as quickly as possible and be done with it, then go ahead.

Another idea is to consider getting a heloc on the property if you were to put 40% down on it. Some credit unions will give you 80% LTV on a rental and up to 100% on a primary for example. So put 40% down, and get a heloc for half that amount and you still have the money available to use for another deal if you want

Thanks @Alexander Murillo - that’s an interesting angle with the heloc. I can totally understand how the 40% down is counter intuitive if you’re in growth mode but I’m not looking to scale in that way, possibly ever. I like the positive cash flow now and having a couple of properties that I’ll hold for (likely) decades and will appreciate well overtime. And at the end of the day, I’m still financing the larger down payment via the cash out refi on my original property so it’s not, in my mind, the same as having worked to save up over time for that large down payment. 

As I’m newer to this, I’m sure I’m missing things but appreciate all the feedback. 

Post: 40% Down to ensure good cash flow?

Joe LudwiczakPosted
  • Fairfield, CT
  • Posts 5
  • Votes 1
Quote from @Chris Seveney:

@Joe Ludwiczak

This depends on the area you are investing in and your overall portfolio.

By reducing your leverage you are reducing your risk and if the asset is in an area that has had a history of appreciating then for short term it may not look like the best investment but over time (which I believe real estate is long game) it’s another asset that continues to build wealth while reducing risk because of lower leverage

So answer is it depends if it’s a good idea or bad, but I would not necessarily exclude it because of a higher than normal down payment. The other question is what else would you do with that $?

Thanks @Chris Seveney  - it’s definitely an expensive area but one that has a good track record for appreciation as well as lesser price drops during historic market declines. I’m definitely looking long term and don’t have aspirations (at this time) to scale up quickly. My aim is to build a portfolio of 4-5 properties (likely single family) over the next 10 years. So in my mind, by putting the additional money down I’m not eliminating my ability to move on another rental acquisition in the short term and I like locking in a lower mortgage so I have a nice buffer on cash flow if rents go down (they are quite high at the moment). 

I can certainly appreciate the broader feedback on not locking up the money. 

Thanks very much 

Post: 40% Down to ensure good cash flow?

Joe LudwiczakPosted
  • Fairfield, CT
  • Posts 5
  • Votes 1

Last year I opted to turn my primary residence into a rental and purchase a new primary residence. In the next year or so I’d like to acquire another single family rental property in my immediate area. At the moment however, the prices are so high that I don’t think I could get good cash flow with 20% down, even with rental prices elevated as well. 

My plan was to do a cash out refi on my current rental (ie my original primary residence) and I have enough equity there that I could take out enough cash to put down 40% down on the new rental I’d like to acquire. I’d still be nicely cash flow positive on the current rental and the 40% down on the new rental would set me up to be cash flow positive there as well. 

Is that a bad idea?