@Brian Burke,
thanks a lot, this is great content and information not easily found out there, specially since you do a lot of these and know how to actually attract investors (I listened to your podcast a while ago)! I completely agree with your position on re-balancing. If an investor took the risk to invest with me, they should also reap the rewards, and I can certainly see how you will get that capital right back to invest it again into another deal once you have repaid it. I just wanted to make sure I understand how it's commonly done. You can be sure that I will follow YOUR recipe since it has obviously worked for you, and you are kind enough to share it.
Last question (I hope):
In the same spirit of being fair to investors: if you sell the asset before the investor's capital has been fully repaid (maybe you dispose it early because it's the right time), what happens with the proceeds? In particular, if there was a preferred return and let's say the investor put in $400k, got $300k back via preferred return so far and an additional $150k back as share of remaining cash flow over the years (so he actually got $450k back in aggregate), and there is a profit when the asset is sold, would you first give the investor $100k (the remaining portion of his capital not paid via preferred return) before splitting the rest of the sale profits according to what was agreed, or would you consider that the capital was already returned (as he got a combined $450k), and proceed directly to splitting the proceeds of the sale?
I hope the question is not too convoluted...
Jean