I’m trying to buy a house in Phoenix using a second home loan, putting 10% down.
I'm trying to understand why anyone would choose the 2/1 buydown if you end up paying the same amount of money, whether you select the 2/1 buydown option or not. Personally, I have no issues making the full monthly payments from the start, so it seems unnecessary to pay the buydown payment just to have lower payments in the first two years.
Additionally, my lender said that if I refinance before the 2-year period is over, the remaining buydown payment would be applied to the principal. This essentially makes the buydown payment no different from just paying the money upfront. So, I'm left questioning what benefits there are to the 2/1 buydown that would make it a recommended option.
I'm thinking that if I skip the 2/1 buydown, the cash to close would be lower, meaning I'd need to put in less of my own money upfront, which seems like a better option to me. I’m just wondering if there’s something I might be overlooking in this reasoning. 😄