@Jack Clough
SALT deductions allowed people in high income States to KEEP more of their tax dollars, because the money was being taxed at other levels. Thats what the purposes was. Now only being able to keep $10K "high" earners in high income states and Metro Areas end up sending even more money to DC. Then you breakdown by State where this money is going and its quite obvious how was it crafted.
How does it level the playing field? The coffers just got filled with more money from their better off cousins. I've been watching what people's opinions are on FB, Fox News, Breibart, Washington Post, etc. People in these Jurisdictions really have no clue what the cost of living is. People really think people making $155K a year are living high on the hog.
More money is sent in from these States even WITH uncapped SALT deductions, look at the Donor/Receiver Analysis by State. This does not encourage these low-earning States to "raise the Tax levels" in their State. It does the exact opposite. Now, does it encourage high income States to lower its tax structures yes. But this is very difficult to do because many of these high income States have legacy costs from Pensions and Healthcare, and probably have lots collective bargaining units within the Govt, so it would be difficult to lower their pay structures just because of that. Also, you have the problem of how would local Govt get a County Administrator of any skill paying $47K a year when a comparable position in the private sector pays $85K.
Plus, my home State has 4% flat tax, you cant go too much lower. My property taxes are a little high, there is room for improvement. Thats due to living next to a City (Detroit) that outnumbers the rest of the county 2:1 person wise, and raising taxes on any County issue is the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd option. However, how many "smaller markets" could I find the job I have in Technology, or my Wife could find multiple places of employment in Healthcare?
First chart was the Atlantic in 2014, it does return on dollars.
This is Wallet Hub's 2017 Analysis (Tax Foundation did one too mirrors it basically), they lower the number the more dollars received.
1 | Kentucky |
2 | Mississippi |
3 | New Mexico |
4 | Alabama |
5 | West Virginia |
6 | South Carolina |
7 | Montana |
8 | Tennessee |
9 | Maine |
10 | Indiana |
11 | Arizona |
12 | Louisiana |
13 | South Dakota |
14 | Missouri |
15 | Oregon |
16 | Georgia |
17 | Idaho |
18 | Vermont |
19 | Wyoming |
20 | Maryland |
21 | Oklahoma |
22 | Pennsylvania |
23 | Alaska |
24 | Rhode Island |
25 | Florida |
26 | Ohio |
27 | Arkansas |
28 | North Carolina |
29 | Hawaii |
30 | Iowa |
31 | Wisconsin |
32 | North Dakota |
33 | Michigan |
34 | New York |
35 | Texas |
36 | Washington |
37 | Colorado |
38 | Virginia |
39 | Nebraska |
40 | Utah |
41 | New Hampshire |
42 | Connecticut |
43 | Massachusetts |
44 | Nevada |
45 | Kansas |
46 | California |
47 | Illinois |
48 | New Jersey |
49 | Minnesota |
50 | Delaware |
This is naked theft from high income States who DEPEND on private sector dollars to subsidize States who basically are propped up by Federal Monies via grants, payments, defense, national security, and Govt Contracts.