Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Hung Dao

Hung Dao has started 3 posts and replied 10 times.

Quote from @Adam Martin:

I'm not sure how you would get your deposit back but am genuinely curious on why you think you deserve it. You both signed a contract and part of your offer was a guarantee of at least 33k on an accepted offer which is exactly what waiving contingencies does. You waived all your contingencies to make a stronger offer but if you can just get out of your obligation of your EMD than what good is it really. It is assumed that this would strengthen your offer and I bet it did which is why you did it. If you truly had no contingency I really don't think you deserve it and your personal work situation does not relieve you of your contractual obligations. I hope your work situation works itself out and wish you the best in the future and look forward to someone answering what happens if you all don't come up to an agreement but my bet is it would involve attorneys and litigation.

In all fairness this is a bigger rant than just your situation but in general I don't believe that people respect contracts as they should and are quick to hold the other party responsible but unwilling to look inward when the shoe is on the other foot.  


I know legally I don't deserve it and it's not the seller's fault. I really regret listening to my agent and waiving the contingencies. I was told the market was still competitive and the seller is only interested in selling and not in the business of taking deposits. The house was sold to the 2nd offer for 10k less which is 1% less. I guess I will reach out to my agent, the seller agent to negotiate in good faith and see how it will turn out. 

I was in a contract to purchase a home in SF Bay Area. I waived all contingencies with my agent suggestion. I made the EMD of $33k and was in the middle of financing. I got the appraisal done. 7 days after the offer was accepted, I got news that my company was doing layoff and I decided to back out. I got laid off a month later.

The seller doesn't want to return full deposit. I just found out my escrow has no other activity and there was another escrow opened. The home was later marked as sold in MLS.

What's my recourse in getting the EMD back? In case there's no agreement from both side, what would happen to the escrow? Will it ever expire and where does the money go?

I want to negotiate in good faith because I wanted the house but suddenly could not afford it. Is there any way to get my EMD (fully or partially) back?

Happy to answer any questions to help out. I'm really in a pickle here and it's stressful.

Originally posted by @Emily Beatty:

Great news for Bay Area home owners and investors alike to get a little more bang for their buck before moving to a jumbo loan. 

Does it also mean that there will be more buyers, more overbidding and the market price will increase?

Post: Does this deal make sense for a SFH in Bayview?

Hung DaoPosted
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 10
  • Votes 0

@Amit M. After talking to seller agent, the tenants are section 8 veteran which allow them to rent shared unit

The house is well kept from the property manager

Is there anyway to figure what type of tenants they are after a small chat?

I will confirm with SFHA about veteran section 8

Post: Does this deal make sense for a SFH in Bayview?

Hung DaoPosted
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 10
  • Votes 0

Yes, from the contracts, it sounds like 2 persons instead of 2 families. They're sharing the kitchen and bathroom. We both have agents and the seller is an investment LLC. My agent said it would work though I'm looking for 2nd opinion.

What worst could happen in this case? The housing authority would cancel one of the contracts and I will have to look for another roommate?

Do you have a link to see the section 8 maximum rent allowance for 2 beds?

Post: Does this deal make sense for a SFH in Bayview?

Hung DaoPosted
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 10
  • Votes 0

From the disclosures, there are 2 separate HAP contracts. Utilities include PGE, water and garbage. My capex is just an estimate on the remaining life of several items, some are just replaced, it's not precise but should be conservative.

As you can see, this doesn't cashflow nor this is a good location. I think I'm buying for the potential to expand later. 

Post: Does this deal make sense for a SFH in Bayview?

Hung DaoPosted
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 10
  • Votes 0

Would love to have blessings from Brian Garlington, Amit M and other folks on this thread. Thanks.

Post: Does this deal make sense for a SFH in Bayview?

Hung DaoPosted
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 10
  • Votes 0

Hi everyone, I'm planning to pull the trigger to become a first time landlord in San Francisco and had my eyes on a SFH in Bayview neighborhood. The 2B1Ba house currently have 2 section 8 tenants paying market rate at $4500. Here are the numbers:

Asking price: $850k, seller is motivated to sell at asking price

Mortgage, tax and insurance: -$4,080.24

Utilities: -$265

Basically I have a bit more than $100 each month for deferred maintenance. I think the existing section 8 tenants would help with uncertainty in the rental market and is recession proof. Also as a first time landlord I don't have to look for new tenant. There is potential expansion to add a legal bonus room or a unit but I don't consider it now since I don't have the capital yet.

Do I miss anything? What are the risks that I didn't see? Also pls give thoughts and advice. I live in the city and want to try it here first before looking elsewhere.

I'm looking to buy a rental property and there is one house which numbers seem to add up for my scenario except for one thing: there are high voltage power lines running through the lot (more on the backyard and less on the house). At first, I didn't notice that since the lines are really high up. However, there is a huge tower 3 blocks away that could be seen anywhere in the neighborhood.

It's a cookie cutter neighborhood so many houses nearby do have the same situation.

I read that besides being a fire hazard, the magnetic field might cause health issue therefore affects price appreciation. Should I walk away from this house? Everything else was perfect.

What about buying to build and live in Santa Rosa? Assuming I have plenty of time to buy and hold and eventually move in to retire there, will the numbers still add up? Would you recommend to buy a lot in Benzene water contamination area to bring the cost down?