Eric is right, and makes great points. I am a property manager in Los Angeles, and as he wrote, you should be able to look at current leases to see what tenants are paying. Or at least the rent roll. But here in LA, the leases automatically go month-to-month after 1 year. Sometimes, the uptick in rent is not always on the lease due to that reason. It is simply a rent increase letter, they accept, and continue paying, with no need to update the lease. That uptick should be in the rent roll.
1.1 million for 4k square feet...sounds like LA prices...the prices out here are crazy...The cap rates on purchases here are so out of whack that it doesn't make sense for any "small-time" investor to purchase. Ex: There's a 2900 sq. foot duplex around the corner from where I manage that is going for $975K...it's in a nice area where Studio City meets Toluca Lake, but come on...almost a $1 million for Duplex...they are selling for land value for investors to tear down and rebuild or someone with cash because that price just does not make sense for someone who wants to finance a deal...there's a lot of that going on all over Los Angeles.
For what it's worth...I've seen substantial increases in rents in Los Angeles since 2012. My wife and I used to manage a building in Sherman Oaks. The 2+2's in that building were renting for $1595 then...when they go vacant now, our management company is pushing for close to $2k month...I've seen rent increases on vacant units at the properties I manage in the past year go from anywhere from as low as 5% in one year to more than 20%...one building where I go to help out, there's a vacant unit that the owner is pushing for an increase in rent of around 15%...there's a myriad of factors involved with these increases, but suffice it to say that rents in Los Angeles are getting very high...