Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Grant Stevens

Grant Stevens has started 3 posts and replied 3 times.

Post: Fitch. TRID not bad for investors. How about RMBS sellers?

Grant StevensPosted
  • Real Estate Professional
  • Vacaville, CA
  • Posts 8
  • Votes 0

ARTICLE FOUND HERE> http://mortgageshots.com/fitch-trid-not-bad-for-in...

also feel free to subscribe to mortgageshots for more news articles about the mortgage and real estate industry >  http://mortgageshots.com/

The problem with the mortgage market is the amount of misinformation that permeates the industry. A perfect example is with the new Fitch report that claims “investors” are in a decent situation when buying RMBS’s. The issue is not with the purchase of mortgage bonds, the issue is with selling bonds. Fitch claims.

“The CRA states that investors will likely be exposed only to maximum statutory damages of $4,000 plus legal fees, consumer claims in defense of foreclosure may occur in judicial states as the consumer will be working with an attorney. Defensive claims in non-judicial states or affirmative claims in any state are less likely.”

That line of thinking isn’t helping companies like W.J. Bradley, who’s now out of business, for this very bottleneck. Fitch states that the statuary damages “may not” exceed “$4,000,” yet until government administrators put this in writing, mortgage liquidity will continue to set like concrete.

The industry needs to know exactly where they stand when writing loans, not where they may stand. More to come on this issue.

Post: Credit Unions Push CFPB for QM Exemptions.

Grant StevensPosted
  • Real Estate Professional
  • Vacaville, CA
  • Posts 8
  • Votes 0

Watch the video here >> http://mortgageshots.com/credit-unions-push-cfpb-for-qm-exemptions/

One thing you gotta say about Credit Union Associations, they’re not afraid to the CFPB for what they want. In this case it’s additional exemptions for qualified mortgages. Their thinking is that they were not the source of the mortgage melt down. That makes sense. Credit Unions either didn’t have the balls or foresight to originate sub-prime crap. Or maybe they were just smarter than the rest of us. Or perhaps they weren’t as greedy. Either way, that’s not the point. How I see it is rules, compliance, enforcement, and application, has “one best practice.” Meaning, what’s good for one group of lenders should be the same for all other groups. For instance, burglary is burglary, regardless of who you are or where you rob. That’s the approach we should take toward mortgage lending. Not surprisingly Credit Unions don’t agree with this position, and unfortunately the CFPB seems to, in part, agree with Credit Unions

Post: CFPB gets caught in deception and nobody’s talking about it.

Grant StevensPosted
  • Real Estate Professional
  • Vacaville, CA
  • Posts 8
  • Votes 0

OK so did the  CFPB write a letter encouraging “The CFPB” to push forward with auto-lending discrimination? You heard me right “CFPB writes letter to CFPB,”

article and video- http://mortgageshots.com/cfpb-gets-caught-in-deception-and-nobodys-talking-about-it/

LETTER- http://dailysignal.com/2016/04/14/did-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-write-lawmaker-signed-letter-to-itself-on-fighting-discrimination/