Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Brandon Snyder

Brandon Snyder has started 24 posts and replied 46 times.

Post: Understanding Title Insurance

Brandon SnyderPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Torrance, CA
  • Posts 46
  • Votes 5

Hey all, thanks for looking into my forum question.  I appreciate it.

I'm taking a real estate class at UCLA.  It's a good class with a good teacher, but the textbook doesn't provide much context.  That's where I'm hoping you all would come in.

I'm trying to wrap my head around title insurance.  I know it's a very good idea to have it (although not required by law) but I'm not sure I understand it.

In what instances would Title Insurance come into effect?  Specifically, what money losses could occur that Title Insurance would give you money for?

I'm taking a Real Estate Principals class at UCLA Extension and I'm studying for the midterm.  In my textbook there are samples of contracts, and I'm reading them through and through, even the tiny print on the back, and there are two clauses which confuse the hell out of me.

2079.18 reads:

No selling agent in a real property transaction may act as an agent for the buyer only, when the selling agent is also acting as the listing agent in the transaction.

2079.22 reads:

Nothing in this article precludes a listing agent from also being a selling agent, and the combination of these functions in one agent does not, of itself, make that agent a dual agent.

How are these two clauses not contradictory?

Post: Mineral rights leasing when selling my house

Brandon SnyderPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Torrance, CA
  • Posts 46
  • Votes 5

So the company, whom I originally leased the mineral rights to, would have to make a new deal with the new owners of the property?  What if I sold the mineral rights to the company, but then sold my property to a new owner?  What then?

Thank you very much for your input already, I really appreciate it.

Post: Mineral rights leasing when selling my house

Brandon SnyderPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Torrance, CA
  • Posts 46
  • Votes 5

Hey everyone, I have a question about leasing mineral rights if you don't mind.

If I lease mineral rights underneath my property to a company, and then sell my house to a third party, does the company keep the mineral rights, or do the new owners get the mineral rights?  Or does it vary from state to state?

Post: Have a question about a passage in my real estate textbook

Brandon SnyderPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Torrance, CA
  • Posts 46
  • Votes 5

Hey all.

I'm going to take a class to start getting my real estate license at UCLA (class starts later this month), and I'm reading a passage in my textbook that was badly written.  I'm hoping any of you can help me make sense of this.  I'm re-typing it word for word.  The bold sentences are what I have the most difficulty with.  Does "the greatest ownership in real property" mean whoever has the greatest ownership in real property?  What does "unqualified" mean?  Can anybody word this better so it's easier to understand?  The passage goes:

"An estate in fee, sometimes known as a fee simple estate, is thegreatest ownership interest in real property.  An estate that is unqualified, of indefinite duration, freely transferable, and inheritable.  It is known as an estate of inheritance or a perpetual estate because the owner may dispose of it in his or her lifetime or after death  by will. This is the most common type of estate that is transferred in a normal real estate transaction.  If the property is transferred or sold with no conditions or limitations on its use, it is known as an estate in fee simple absolute."

Thank you very much for your help!

-Brandon

Post: Field Report: Found a Probate Deal, now I gotta get him to sell

Brandon SnyderPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Torrance, CA
  • Posts 46
  • Votes 5

I want to do Whole-selling, and a friend of mine, who is a real estate agent, suggested I look for probates at the local 

Yesterday, I went to the Los Angeles court house to look for probates.  I found a few, and brought back my findings to my friend's real estate office.  One of them turned out to be a real winner!  He has an investor on the line, and his mentor, who also works at the same real estate office, has two more investors on the line.

Now the next step is to contact the home owner, and see if he would be interested in selling.  I couldn't find his phone number, but I have his address.  

What do I do?

Thanks,

Brandon

Post: Checking to see if I understand Whole-selling

Brandon SnyderPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Torrance, CA
  • Posts 46
  • Votes 5

I read an article about transactional funding (copied and pasted below) I wanted to make sure I I comprehend everything, and I really want to break it down to its molecules. That's the only way I'm going to get this.

let's see if I can understand the steps.

1. Mary secures a house for $200,000.

2. Enrique, the money lender, loans Mary $200,000.

3. Now with that money, Mary buys the house for 200k. She secures it under contract (and I have to know what that contract entails, and how to write it up).  At the moment she has $0 and the house is hers.

4. John, the investor, pays Mary $250,000, and Mary signs the house over to John. John now owns the house, is out $250,000 at the moment, and spends $30,000 more on repairs. He has now spent $280,000 on both the purchase of the house, and on the repairs.

5. Mary has $250,000.  She owes Enrique the Lender $200,000 plus (let's say) 15% interest. 15% interest of $200,000 is: (200,000 X .15) 30,000.  So Mary owes a total of $230,000 to Enrique.

6. Enrique the lender makes $30,000 from loaning to Mary. Mary makes $20,000 from selling the house contract to John. John makes a whopping $120,000 because he sold his freshly rehabbed house for $400,000 which covers the cost of buying the house, and fixing it up.

QUESTIONS:

1. Why couldn't John just buy the house for $200,000 in the first place and cut Mary out altogether?

2. If Mary discloses too much information (where the house is, how much she is buying it for, etc.) can John sneak in, buy the place for $200,000 and cut Mary out altogether?

3. What information should Mary disclose to John?  What information should she NOT disclose to John?  Basically, I'm asking how the middle man can protect him/herself from being cut out?

4. What if John chooses NOT to buy the house from Mary (Sorry, kid, I found a better deal)?  What does she do then?  How will she pay back Enrique?  I had read something about "contingency," but how does that work?

-Brandon

Transactional funding allows a wholesaler the opportunity to purchase a property with none of the wholesaler's funds, provided that there is already an investor in place to purchase the property from the wholesaler within a short time frame of 2-5 days.

For instance, Mary (wholesaler) has secured a property at 200k, and already has John (a cash buyer/investor) for 250k. John is confident that after 30k in repairs/rehab, he will be able to sell it for 400k. So Mary opens escrow, and upon Enrique (a transactional funding lender) doing due his diligence, Enrique will fund Mary's purchase of the property including closing costs.

Transactional funding has also been used lately for longer term deals, in which the end buyer is financing their transaction. The length of the term can range from 30-120 days. In this situation, if an investor has secured a property and already has an end user in place, the investor will not necessarily have to provide any funds in order to close their purchase of the property.

For instance, Frank (an investor) has secured a property for 210k, and Frank already has and end user for the retail value of the property at 300k. The end user's name is Jeff. Jeff is qualified and approved for a loan for 300k, so Frank is confident that he has a great deal. Frank goes to Enrique (a transactional lender) for an extended/delayed transactional funding. Enrique provides 210k plus closing costs, and allows 30 days or more for Jeff to close his loan to purchase the property at 300k.

Transactional Funding is related to or also known as funding back to back closes, flash funding, double closes, simultaneous closes, double escrows.

Enrique Barrios, 818-915-2543 ph, Transactional Funding Lender, Hard Money Lender, Real Estate Investor, Los Angeles, CA.

Post: How do I start reaching out to investors in the Los Angeles area?

Brandon SnyderPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Torrance, CA
  • Posts 46
  • Votes 5

You're right, Wes.  I don't need to know everything right now, and I shouldn't stress out too much on this potential meeting.  I haven't even made the call yet!

After that meeting, I'll post a field report on this thread.  Of course if anyone has any other slices of advice, I'd love to hear it.  And thank you all for your help.

Post: How do I start reaching out to investors in the Los Angeles area?

Brandon SnyderPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Torrance, CA
  • Posts 46
  • Votes 5

Thank you very much Joshua, I really appreciate it.  

Should I simply ask, "Do you know of any special financing deals?"  And if he does, what answers could I expect from him?  What kind of special financing deals are there?  Could he perhaps have first-hand knowledge of houses just put up for sale?

Post: How do I start reaching out to investors in the Los Angeles area?

Brandon SnyderPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Torrance, CA
  • Posts 46
  • Votes 5

Hey everyone, I'm brand new at this, and I wanted to ask a question.

I think wholesaling is the best way for me to start my career in real estate.  I found a mortgage broker in Manhattan beach, and I want to sit down with him for about 20 minutes.  My goal from this meeting is to connect with a real estate investor, and I think it's likely he would know a few.

The thing is, I don't really know what to say or how to go about that meeting.  I have a few key ideas for an intelligent conversation, but I could use a few pointers to iron things out.

1. I'll have something to offer.  I am good at copy editing, so if he needs a business letter or proposal cleaned, I'll do that for free in exchange for a meeting.

2. State my intentions.  Tell him I'm interested in wholesaling, and I'm looking for investors to connect with.

I think my sticking point is getting this man to care about helping me, and I was wondering if any of you could give me a few tips.  Perhaps I'm going to the wrong person for an initial meeting?