Hello BP friends-
My husband and I are just getting started on our investing journey and let me start by saying we are so thankful for each and everyone on here who shares their wisdom in articles and posts.
As part of our first step to get started on the right foot we want to lower our expenses as much as possible, which is why we are currently in the process of refinancing our home in TX. I have been trying to find the answer to my question but was only able to find general answers that didn't apply to our specific situation. So I figured why not reach out to the BP members.
My husband and I are currently in the process of refinancing our former primary residence in TX (conventional loan) and are unsure whether we need to refinance it as a second home or an investment property.
More about our situation:
We have lived in the home for 2 years and had a job related move to Ohio about a year ago. Our home in Texas is now occupied (rent free) by my husband's parents, whom he is supporting financially.
As we have been speaking to lenders we have received quite different rates and terms, which did not seem within the common range. We realised that was due to the lenders either considering the the property as an investment or a second home/vacation home. So here is my question: Does it depend on the lenders policy whether it is considered one or the other or is there only one correct answer but they just haven't asked or we have not provided specific enough questions to determine the correct category.
Hoping someone can shed some light on this so that going forward we'll be able to attain effective lender quotes to compare.
Thank you everyone! :)
