Thanks yeah I planned to use an agent to complete the transaction but love to be as independent as possible in the process- for convenience, speed, self-awareness. I don't mind relying on good people but I hate depending on people.
So I looked at a property today. They'd take contract for deed or cash from a loan. Rates are a steal. I'd have to put down 25% (or what we negotiate) for CFD so that would be money at risk. I realized if one does a CFD and pays 95% and then misses the last few payments and loses all equity, one is still ahead financially if the property cash flowed the whole time significantly. but when they ask to put a lot down or if it needs massive repairs or whatever- that you choose to undertake (Because CFD you can always walk away, right?) then you have skin in the game.
This property looks really good. They're pro investors. The Two tenant families in the 1800s 2-story duplex seem 'seasoned' and I'd get them. Combined it brings in about 2300/mo and asking price of property is only 185k. This seems too good- I could cash flow over 1k/mo when all is said and done? Why would I not? Tell me, why would I not, if I can get financing? I want to make them an offer but I want to do so intelligently. I believe in fairness and non deception but also intelligence and I'm learning this.
So in making ht offer, which I want to do tonight-- offers do not usually involve a form right? That's more purchase agreement? for forms I was going to use Bill Vaughn's forms that I got, from hsi program. They include the clauses that protect me. I can make a purchase agreement with clauses like "subject to attaining suitable financing" and "subject to inspection" (roof, foundation and everything are solid). So of course I would want this property right? So do I use my agent (my seasoned investor cousin) to make the offer, or can I DIY? I want to DIY if I can here but for closing and all I could use him. He's against this property but that's not why I want to avoid him. I just want to man up and go for it and grow.
Ok tons of questions. Also my financial situation- I have a 2.75% 15 year mortgage on my home property, PI is about 1200ish. I can refi at about the same rate (I'm told) for 30 years. That would lower my monthly pmt between $7-800 which is huge not just for freeing up cash but also lowering debt to income ratio. I can still pay down as fast as before if I choose to. Why wouldn't I? I got laid off though and am just finishing coding bootcamp about to start searching for work. At this second I don't have non rental income to qualify for anything. My dad is well off but doesn't want to lend and I don't want to be lent to so he can guarantee, get his name on property as owner non occupant and he won't even charge me the 100/mo I offered. He has nothing to lose. The lender is down for this and when I get a job they can take him off and quit claim him. This starts the ball rolling for this wave of investing. Of course I'd want to do something similar on separate properties if I could, if my dad and the lender are down but good to start with my home right now I guess. Things are quickening and I love it. I love action. All the stuff I mentioned literally manifest today. See I understand the bank's requirements and POV (I have been a CPA) but in my view I "should like" to be lent on every property, if I get 20% down from my equity or whatever, regardless of my income level because the property will cash flow, but banks and lenders don't think like that, even though it's logical. So if I can get my dad to guarantee or just wait till I get income, even relatively low, I think I'm good. Or maybe do mortgage insurance. Didn't ask him about that. But I want to keep getting lent to on quality properties that will cash flow as long as I have the down payment. If they don't do this I can see about my dad guaranteeing. He might not on other properties but I can start with my home. That refi will help as UI peters out.
So I want to make these guys I saw today an offer. I think the 185 price is fair and workable. I just want the right "subject-to" clauses. I think but don't know that on the offer, it is more informal until you get it in writing. Subject to me getting financing. I could do the contract for deed today on my own without any third party help (I have a 40k heloc and my equity has increased significantly) but that's putting major skin in the game. I like the investor teachers that say you can't lose anything if you don't write any checks. Aren't they smart? So subject-tos I want are subject to finding financing and the house not having serious structural needs, and title being clear. I'm just talking about the offer and the beginning of negotation, not the actual written purchase agreement which will be more detailed. I'm careful to protect myself. I usually succeed in things which means I'm too careful and not doing enough. "Deliberative" was one of my Clifton strengths. He has another offer they're in negotiation with. He's expecting word from me tonight- so healthy pressure. So any timely response here is appreciated! Why they are selling: "He's the adult son of a real estate investor- so second gen, and they want to free up money for other deals. They're not wholesalers. I don't know why they don't keep it. Maybe they have better deals. I'd take 1k+/mo, if I'm not missing anything, less even 200-300/mo reserve for repairs. It's also right by metropolitan university. Even at 45k down (25%) it's a great cash on cash return--- just kinda need that 45 to be more protected than would be in CFD, so maybe say subject to financing I'd give them 190.
Listening and learning from Bill Vaughn- the theory is great.. now the implementation is greater and more interesting