@Brandon Sturgill Picking the top ten cities is not as simple as reading a Forbes article, unless I want to join the competitive (and overpaying) masses in cities crowded with investors. My network has not been dropping strong rehab options in my lap because the areas I am in have a poor price to rent ratio. If I am going to invest outside of my backyard, I would prefer to make a data driven decision about what city has potential for growth (based primarily on job growth, not just development of hipster coffee shops), while exhibiting sufficient cash flow to enter a deal. We don't need a very comprehensive report, which is why I listed 3 stats - but we would prefer it to be nationwide.
I do like your suggestion of contacting a commercial agent, though my assumption (which may be wrong) is that it would be secondary to picking a 3-4 cities to investigate in depth. As a salesperson who lives on commission, I am not keen to waste a broker's time until I think the area is where I want to be. Thoughts? I am certainly open to Ohio.
@Andrew Hogan I am familiar with all of those resources as mentioned above. I have spent time exploring each of them to identify the metrics most relevant to our work. I am also keenly aware of the quirks in the data, such as the fact that a city that expands its geographic boundaries will exhibit "population growth" but not a change in "migration". Knowing the data is rife with tons of these flaws, I would prefer to work with a demographer who would (maybe?) correct for actual growth or at least help us interpret the results accurately. As a scientist, I have a healthy dubious relationship with data and all the wrong directions it can send you. Since there are agencies that undoubtedly have affordable data packages that cost a fraction of my personal hourly rate to assemble myself, I have no qualms about paying for the data.