I really appreciate
all the input. I didn't expect so many points of view, but it does sound like
for my particular situation, stocks/options would benefit me more. As some of
you mentioned, diversity is probably the way to go. I will probably look into allocating
a small percentage to real estate, especially for the tax advantages that you
can't get in stocks. I just don't look forward to being a property manager…
@Nathan A., I agree
RE is more work, which is the reason for my post.
@Eliott Elias, as I
mention on my post, I made 20% last year when the market went down, so the nice
thing about stock, more specifically options, you could make money either way.
@Jon Puente, I sell options
which is more active, but not as active I expect RE to be.
@Scott E., thanks
your input. I agree, it would be a good idea to diversify into both for
specially for the tax benefits.
@Jacob St. Martin, you
make a lot of good points, but I've been looking in CA in it is difficult to
get good cash flow. I actually don't own many stocks, I sell options, which
provides me with a great cash flow - the 20% is my stocks cash flow, not
appreciation. The tax savings is the game changer for me, in my opinion. I
could offset stock gains with real estate. With options, you could definitely
leverage, there are trades for any risk appetite, but maybe it is not leveraged
as much as RE.
@Duriel Taylor, you
make a point that everyone will need a home, but there will also always be
companies to invest in as well.
@John Mathew, the
illiquidity of RE is another reason that deters me, but it's ok to invest money
I would not need. As mentioned above with options, I can generate a nice cash
flow, so wouldn't be a reason for me.