Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Ethan Brackin

Ethan Brackin has started 4 posts and replied 13 times.

Quote from @Michael Calvey:

A feature that our Pro Members love is the fact that they can manage of all their rental properties for free using RentRedi. RentRedi is great because they provide our members with 1 to 1 support and onboarding to help get started. A lot of BP Pro Members are landlords so they need a software to manage those properties, so the RentRedi Perk saves members around $360 in software costs. 

If you want to activate it, you can simply log in with your BP Account - Activate RentRedi Perk

Awesome, thanks for the reply!

Running a sort of mini poll:

How many users purchase BiggerPockets Pro, and what are some of the features provided that help justify the monthly price point to those of you that have bought it?

Quote from @Marcus Auerbach:
Quote from @Ethan Brackin:
Quote from @Marcus Auerbach:
Quote from @Ethan Brackin:
Quote from @Marcus Auerbach:
Quote from @Ethan Brackin:
Quote from @Paul Novak:
Quote from @Marcus Auerbach:
Quote from @Paul Novak:

Marcus I think this was a great post.  I have not subscribed to the stance of trying to get into a property with as little down as possible just to generate cashflow.  I have actually taking the unpopular stance of the exact opposite.  I have tried to focus on properties that are in good locations where I can attract good tenants and then adjusted what I put down to hit my cashflow goals.  Not adjusting for vacancy and maintenance my cashflow goal on a property is $500 per month at a minimum.  We have put down 20 - 40% on some properties to achieve this goal.  Like you said we have been saving upwards of 60% of our W2 income and business cashflow in order to do this.  


Hi Paul! I think I am just south of you?  Unpopular maybe, but for sure realistic and prudent. Buying quality assets that are in a desirable location and in good condition with a modest amount of leverage is IMO the only approach that I feel comfortable recommending. I have tried pretty much anything personally and I have seen so many investors start and either succeed or fail - well, let's call it abort and sell to never touch RE again.

And then I get calls from OOS investors who want to buy a 120k duplex in Milwaukee and when I try to tell them what will happen they go: uhm, I don't think we are a good fit. (Which is true, because I do mostly luxury residential, just trying to help)


Marcus, you are just south. I invest in the Sheboygan area. I agree with your assessments. So much content I see about ways to put as little money down as possible or doing the BRRR method so you can purchase a property and then pull out all the equity so after it's rehabbed you can get all your capital back out. I am not trying to knock those approaches and obviously they have worked great for many people but I feel the market is different then it was in the past. Personally I am not finding deals that could support those strategies in my market today based on my current skills and available time. If I took that approach I would have negative cashflow which isn't a good sustainable business model. I am okay with limited cashflow while I'm in my prime W2 working years but not negative. My business still needs to sustain itself. In my opinion that leaves me with two options. Sit back and wait for the market conditions to flip to where those strategies would work for me, or adapt to the current market. Sitting on the sidelines for me isn't an option. Knowing I'll be holding onto these properties for the next 30 years plus I have no issues with my strategy. I also am not looking for cheep properties in bad locations that could turn a quick buck. I want properties that I am proud to own and if I was personally looking for a rental I would be willing to rent. Obviously that isn't a requirement for most to buy a property but it's something that's important to me. Because I purchase properties like that I feel we attract tenants that we can relate to which helps us on the property management side with communication and working through issues.

Why do you believe there is a higher likelihood of negative cash flow with BRRRR? Is it because the loan you assume after a cash-out refinance is more likely to be higher than your gross cash flow?

Hi Ethan, I have been BRRRR-ing in Milwaukee for over a decade and after 2016-2018 or so I had to work increasingly harder to make deals work (much more complex rehabs: mold, foundation issues etc). Today our inventory is so low, that sellers don't have to give me 50% discount because of poor condition. They will find a first time home buyer that will be happy to pay close to what the neighbor's house (in great condition) is worth. If you can find one where you get the price to match the work needed, it is still one of the best strategies! But that's a big IF in 2025.

The approach that I take now is to let market appreciation and inflation do the heavy lifting for me. We have seen prices go up 8.2% in 2024 here and why would I work hard for half a year to do not that much better, if I can just do nothing instead?

Money, time and energy are interchangeable in real estate. If you don't have much money, but you do have time and energy, you can use that to find a unicorn deal that will still work with BRRRR.

Paul?

Thank you for the thorough response. Do you personally use traditional financing with BRRRR or do you pay for properties with cash? I have read the BRRRR book as well as some other investment books and though I am aware that the author recommends buying properties with all cash, I am still torn between going that route or going with traditional financing instead (or perhaps even a "hybrid" of those two options; saving up to put 40 to even 50% down or more to get higher cash flow and more equity right away, while also being able to forego the waiting process of building up enough capital to invest all-cash in another property again (assuming I don't use a hard-money loan). I'm not sure how this "hybrid" approach would affect the cash-out refinance or if the approach is even viable at all, though. I have never invested before so forgive my ignorance. 

The most important thing on your first deal is to keep the risk low. You do this buy buying a quality asset in a good enough location. And by not biting off more than you can chew for the rehab. A cosmetic rehab is still quite a challenge for the first time. Paint, carpet, light fixtures, maybe some doors, plus odds and ends - you'll learn a lot! Conventional financing will work for this just fine. Yes you will need a 6 months seasoning period, but by the time you got the work done, a tenant moved in - the 6 months will be almost over. HML is expensive, better to use private money from friends or family. Once you got the first deal under your belt, you can start thinking about the second.

I did alright on my first 3 rehabs, but got over-confident and #4 was a massive mess and turned out to be a money pit. I took on too much. I remember looking at the $60,000 bank account for the rehab at almost zero, still checks to write and still more work I had not even scheduled yet. I felt physically sick and had to go tell my wife.. The good thing is that rentals are very forgiving and I eventually recovered and years later it even started cashflowing. 


 Your advice is invaluable, thank you! Lastly, do you typically find yourself cash-out refinancing your deals and, if you do, do you set your rent on the higher end to compensate for the increased mortgage costs you will inevitably have to pay after you refinance?




I am not in favor of growing via cash-out refi. If you just borrow more money, you are getting deeper in debt. As you mentioned, you have to eventually pay it all back, with interest. There is a healthy amount of leverage, but the whole point of investing is to grow equity, and eventually a return on that equity. If you constantly cash-out refi you reduce equity and cash flow.

That's why I am trying so hard to make the point that you need a business that generates cash so you have money to in-vest on top of what your W2 is making. You don't need to buy a car dealership, it can be a side hustle or an online business.

If you try to get more rent than fair market, you will rent to desperate tenants, who got rejected everywhere else. We do the opposite. We do everything we can to attract the best tenants possible and have them stay for many years. That's why our rehabs look more like flips and we even finish basements as we target families with kids who want to get into the school district.


Great points. Thank you.

Quote from @Marcus Auerbach:
Quote from @Ethan Brackin:
Quote from @Marcus Auerbach:
Quote from @Ethan Brackin:
Quote from @Paul Novak:
Quote from @Marcus Auerbach:
Quote from @Paul Novak:

Marcus I think this was a great post.  I have not subscribed to the stance of trying to get into a property with as little down as possible just to generate cashflow.  I have actually taking the unpopular stance of the exact opposite.  I have tried to focus on properties that are in good locations where I can attract good tenants and then adjusted what I put down to hit my cashflow goals.  Not adjusting for vacancy and maintenance my cashflow goal on a property is $500 per month at a minimum.  We have put down 20 - 40% on some properties to achieve this goal.  Like you said we have been saving upwards of 60% of our W2 income and business cashflow in order to do this.  


Hi Paul! I think I am just south of you?  Unpopular maybe, but for sure realistic and prudent. Buying quality assets that are in a desirable location and in good condition with a modest amount of leverage is IMO the only approach that I feel comfortable recommending. I have tried pretty much anything personally and I have seen so many investors start and either succeed or fail - well, let's call it abort and sell to never touch RE again.

And then I get calls from OOS investors who want to buy a 120k duplex in Milwaukee and when I try to tell them what will happen they go: uhm, I don't think we are a good fit. (Which is true, because I do mostly luxury residential, just trying to help)


Marcus, you are just south. I invest in the Sheboygan area. I agree with your assessments. So much content I see about ways to put as little money down as possible or doing the BRRR method so you can purchase a property and then pull out all the equity so after it's rehabbed you can get all your capital back out. I am not trying to knock those approaches and obviously they have worked great for many people but I feel the market is different then it was in the past. Personally I am not finding deals that could support those strategies in my market today based on my current skills and available time. If I took that approach I would have negative cashflow which isn't a good sustainable business model. I am okay with limited cashflow while I'm in my prime W2 working years but not negative. My business still needs to sustain itself. In my opinion that leaves me with two options. Sit back and wait for the market conditions to flip to where those strategies would work for me, or adapt to the current market. Sitting on the sidelines for me isn't an option. Knowing I'll be holding onto these properties for the next 30 years plus I have no issues with my strategy. I also am not looking for cheep properties in bad locations that could turn a quick buck. I want properties that I am proud to own and if I was personally looking for a rental I would be willing to rent. Obviously that isn't a requirement for most to buy a property but it's something that's important to me. Because I purchase properties like that I feel we attract tenants that we can relate to which helps us on the property management side with communication and working through issues.

Why do you believe there is a higher likelihood of negative cash flow with BRRRR? Is it because the loan you assume after a cash-out refinance is more likely to be higher than your gross cash flow?

Hi Ethan, I have been BRRRR-ing in Milwaukee for over a decade and after 2016-2018 or so I had to work increasingly harder to make deals work (much more complex rehabs: mold, foundation issues etc). Today our inventory is so low, that sellers don't have to give me 50% discount because of poor condition. They will find a first time home buyer that will be happy to pay close to what the neighbor's house (in great condition) is worth. If you can find one where you get the price to match the work needed, it is still one of the best strategies! But that's a big IF in 2025.

The approach that I take now is to let market appreciation and inflation do the heavy lifting for me. We have seen prices go up 8.2% in 2024 here and why would I work hard for half a year to do not that much better, if I can just do nothing instead?

Money, time and energy are interchangeable in real estate. If you don't have much money, but you do have time and energy, you can use that to find a unicorn deal that will still work with BRRRR.

Paul?

Thank you for the thorough response. Do you personally use traditional financing with BRRRR or do you pay for properties with cash? I have read the BRRRR book as well as some other investment books and though I am aware that the author recommends buying properties with all cash, I am still torn between going that route or going with traditional financing instead (or perhaps even a "hybrid" of those two options; saving up to put 40 to even 50% down or more to get higher cash flow and more equity right away, while also being able to forego the waiting process of building up enough capital to invest all-cash in another property again (assuming I don't use a hard-money loan). I'm not sure how this "hybrid" approach would affect the cash-out refinance or if the approach is even viable at all, though. I have never invested before so forgive my ignorance. 

The most important thing on your first deal is to keep the risk low. You do this buy buying a quality asset in a good enough location. And by not biting off more than you can chew for the rehab. A cosmetic rehab is still quite a challenge for the first time. Paint, carpet, light fixtures, maybe some doors, plus odds and ends - you'll learn a lot! Conventional financing will work for this just fine. Yes you will need a 6 months seasoning period, but by the time you got the work done, a tenant moved in - the 6 months will be almost over. HML is expensive, better to use private money from friends or family. Once you got the first deal under your belt, you can start thinking about the second.

I did alright on my first 3 rehabs, but got over-confident and #4 was a massive mess and turned out to be a money pit. I took on too much. I remember looking at the $60,000 bank account for the rehab at almost zero, still checks to write and still more work I had not even scheduled yet. I felt physically sick and had to go tell my wife.. The good thing is that rentals are very forgiving and I eventually recovered and years later it even started cashflowing. 


 Your advice is invaluable, thank you! Lastly, do you typically find yourself cash-out refinancing your deals and, if you do, do you set your rent on the higher end to compensate for the increased mortgage costs you will inevitably have to pay after you refinance?

Quote from @Marcus Auerbach:
Quote from @Ethan Brackin:
Quote from @Paul Novak:
Quote from @Marcus Auerbach:
Quote from @Paul Novak:

Marcus I think this was a great post.  I have not subscribed to the stance of trying to get into a property with as little down as possible just to generate cashflow.  I have actually taking the unpopular stance of the exact opposite.  I have tried to focus on properties that are in good locations where I can attract good tenants and then adjusted what I put down to hit my cashflow goals.  Not adjusting for vacancy and maintenance my cashflow goal on a property is $500 per month at a minimum.  We have put down 20 - 40% on some properties to achieve this goal.  Like you said we have been saving upwards of 60% of our W2 income and business cashflow in order to do this.  


Hi Paul! I think I am just south of you?  Unpopular maybe, but for sure realistic and prudent. Buying quality assets that are in a desirable location and in good condition with a modest amount of leverage is IMO the only approach that I feel comfortable recommending. I have tried pretty much anything personally and I have seen so many investors start and either succeed or fail - well, let's call it abort and sell to never touch RE again.

And then I get calls from OOS investors who want to buy a 120k duplex in Milwaukee and when I try to tell them what will happen they go: uhm, I don't think we are a good fit. (Which is true, because I do mostly luxury residential, just trying to help)


Marcus, you are just south. I invest in the Sheboygan area. I agree with your assessments. So much content I see about ways to put as little money down as possible or doing the BRRR method so you can purchase a property and then pull out all the equity so after it's rehabbed you can get all your capital back out. I am not trying to knock those approaches and obviously they have worked great for many people but I feel the market is different then it was in the past. Personally I am not finding deals that could support those strategies in my market today based on my current skills and available time. If I took that approach I would have negative cashflow which isn't a good sustainable business model. I am okay with limited cashflow while I'm in my prime W2 working years but not negative. My business still needs to sustain itself. In my opinion that leaves me with two options. Sit back and wait for the market conditions to flip to where those strategies would work for me, or adapt to the current market. Sitting on the sidelines for me isn't an option. Knowing I'll be holding onto these properties for the next 30 years plus I have no issues with my strategy. I also am not looking for cheep properties in bad locations that could turn a quick buck. I want properties that I am proud to own and if I was personally looking for a rental I would be willing to rent. Obviously that isn't a requirement for most to buy a property but it's something that's important to me. Because I purchase properties like that I feel we attract tenants that we can relate to which helps us on the property management side with communication and working through issues.

Why do you believe there is a higher likelihood of negative cash flow with BRRRR? Is it because the loan you assume after a cash-out refinance is more likely to be higher than your gross cash flow?

Hi Ethan, I have been BRRRR-ing in Milwaukee for over a decade and after 2016-2018 or so I had to work increasingly harder to make deals work (much more complex rehabs: mold, foundation issues etc). Today our inventory is so low, that sellers don't have to give me 50% discount because of poor condition. They will find a first time home buyer that will be happy to pay close to what the neighbor's house (in great condition) is worth. If you can find one where you get the price to match the work needed, it is still one of the best strategies! But that's a big IF in 2025.

The approach that I take now is to let market appreciation and inflation do the heavy lifting for me. We have seen prices go up 8.2% in 2024 here and why would I work hard for half a year to do not that much better, if I can just do nothing instead?

Money, time and energy are interchangeable in real estate. If you don't have much money, but you do have time and energy, you can use that to find a unicorn deal that will still work with BRRRR.

Paul?

Thank you for the thorough response. Do you personally use traditional financing with BRRRR or do you pay for properties with cash? I have read the BRRRR book as well as some other investment books and though I am aware that the author recommends buying properties with all cash, I am still torn between going that route or going with traditional financing instead (or perhaps even a "hybrid" of those two options; saving up to put 40 to even 50% down or more to get higher cash flow and more equity right away, while also being able to forego the waiting process of building up enough capital to invest all-cash in another property again (assuming I don't use a hard-money loan). I'm not sure how this "hybrid" approach would affect the cash-out refinance or if the approach is even viable at all, though. I have never invested before so forgive my ignorance. 
Quote from @Paul Novak:
Quote from @Ethan Brackin:
Quote from @Paul Novak:
Quote from @Marcus Auerbach:
Quote from @Paul Novak:

Marcus I think this was a great post.  I have not subscribed to the stance of trying to get into a property with as little down as possible just to generate cashflow.  I have actually taking the unpopular stance of the exact opposite.  I have tried to focus on properties that are in good locations where I can attract good tenants and then adjusted what I put down to hit my cashflow goals.  Not adjusting for vacancy and maintenance my cashflow goal on a property is $500 per month at a minimum.  We have put down 20 - 40% on some properties to achieve this goal.  Like you said we have been saving upwards of 60% of our W2 income and business cashflow in order to do this.  


Hi Paul! I think I am just south of you?  Unpopular maybe, but for sure realistic and prudent. Buying quality assets that are in a desirable location and in good condition with a modest amount of leverage is IMO the only approach that I feel comfortable recommending. I have tried pretty much anything personally and I have seen so many investors start and either succeed or fail - well, let's call it abort and sell to never touch RE again.

And then I get calls from OOS investors who want to buy a 120k duplex in Milwaukee and when I try to tell them what will happen they go: uhm, I don't think we are a good fit. (Which is true, because I do mostly luxury residential, just trying to help)


Marcus, you are just south. I invest in the Sheboygan area. I agree with your assessments. So much content I see about ways to put as little money down as possible or doing the BRRR method so you can purchase a property and then pull out all the equity so after it's rehabbed you can get all your capital back out. I am not trying to knock those approaches and obviously they have worked great for many people but I feel the market is different then it was in the past. Personally I am not finding deals that could support those strategies in my market today based on my current skills and available time. If I took that approach I would have negative cashflow which isn't a good sustainable business model. I am okay with limited cashflow while I'm in my prime W2 working years but not negative. My business still needs to sustain itself. In my opinion that leaves me with two options. Sit back and wait for the market conditions to flip to where those strategies would work for me, or adapt to the current market. Sitting on the sidelines for me isn't an option. Knowing I'll be holding onto these properties for the next 30 years plus I have no issues with my strategy. I also am not looking for cheep properties in bad locations that could turn a quick buck. I want properties that I am proud to own and if I was personally looking for a rental I would be willing to rent. Obviously that isn't a requirement for most to buy a property but it's something that's important to me. Because I purchase properties like that I feel we attract tenants that we can relate to which helps us on the property management side with communication and working through issues.

Why do you believe there is a higher likelihood of negative cash flow with BRRRR? Is it because the loan you assume after a cash-out refinance is more likely to be higher than your gross cash flow?


Ethan, good question. I used my comment more as a generalization then practical application. I am not saying that a BRRRR's always have negative cashflow, that isn't the case. My point is that I see many people trying to find deals where you pull as much equity out of the deal as possible and still get cashflow. I just don't see where the properties in my buy box allow for that option. I need equity to cashflow, sometimes north of 30% down and I don't feel that is a bad thing. I just want to temper expectations of new investors that are being told that you can buy a property with 5% down and generate cash flow, or they can flip a house pull out there entire investment and cash flow. I feel if there is too much information out there like that when new investors start analyzing deals and they don't see the numbers work like many describe it discourages them to the point of passing on good deals or passing on real estate investing all together.

I am still new and didn't get started until 2021.  I only have 5 properties and know I have a lot to learn but from my experience to do this takes cash.  I have taken a more traditional route with conventional financing and a high savings rate from my W2 vs. creative financing, house hacking, 1031 exchanges, and other methods.  My main point is two fold, you can invest in real estate in any market at any time you just might have to change your approach, and don't think that there is a magic bullet that you can do this with no cash.  This is a capital intensive business.

Thanks for the response! You make great points, and I definitely agree that I have often seen unrealistic expectations from people in my age demographic who are trying to break into the real estate investing game.

Quote from @Paul Novak:
Quote from @Marcus Auerbach:
Quote from @Paul Novak:

Marcus I think this was a great post.  I have not subscribed to the stance of trying to get into a property with as little down as possible just to generate cashflow.  I have actually taking the unpopular stance of the exact opposite.  I have tried to focus on properties that are in good locations where I can attract good tenants and then adjusted what I put down to hit my cashflow goals.  Not adjusting for vacancy and maintenance my cashflow goal on a property is $500 per month at a minimum.  We have put down 20 - 40% on some properties to achieve this goal.  Like you said we have been saving upwards of 60% of our W2 income and business cashflow in order to do this.  


Hi Paul! I think I am just south of you?  Unpopular maybe, but for sure realistic and prudent. Buying quality assets that are in a desirable location and in good condition with a modest amount of leverage is IMO the only approach that I feel comfortable recommending. I have tried pretty much anything personally and I have seen so many investors start and either succeed or fail - well, let's call it abort and sell to never touch RE again.

And then I get calls from OOS investors who want to buy a 120k duplex in Milwaukee and when I try to tell them what will happen they go: uhm, I don't think we are a good fit. (Which is true, because I do mostly luxury residential, just trying to help)


Marcus, you are just south. I invest in the Sheboygan area. I agree with your assessments. So much content I see about ways to put as little money down as possible or doing the BRRR method so you can purchase a property and then pull out all the equity so after it's rehabbed you can get all your capital back out. I am not trying to knock those approaches and obviously they have worked great for many people but I feel the market is different then it was in the past. Personally I am not finding deals that could support those strategies in my market today based on my current skills and available time. If I took that approach I would have negative cashflow which isn't a good sustainable business model. I am okay with limited cashflow while I'm in my prime W2 working years but not negative. My business still needs to sustain itself. In my opinion that leaves me with two options. Sit back and wait for the market conditions to flip to where those strategies would work for me, or adapt to the current market. Sitting on the sidelines for me isn't an option. Knowing I'll be holding onto these properties for the next 30 years plus I have no issues with my strategy. I also am not looking for cheep properties in bad locations that could turn a quick buck. I want properties that I am proud to own and if I was personally looking for a rental I would be willing to rent. Obviously that isn't a requirement for most to buy a property but it's something that's important to me. Because I purchase properties like that I feel we attract tenants that we can relate to which helps us on the property management side with communication and working through issues.

Why do you believe there is a higher likelihood of negative cash flow with BRRRR? Is it because the loan you assume after a cash-out refinance is more likely to be higher than your gross cash flow?

Post: New Agent in the Chattanooga, TN Area

Ethan BrackinPosted
  • Posts 13
  • Votes 8

I am in the process of studying for my licensing exam in the state of Tennessee and plan to work in the Chattanooga area upon completion of the test (which will be quite soon). I have been eyeing a few brokerages around that general location and was wondering if anyone familiar with the area had any recommendations regarding which brokerage to pick, as there are quite a few to choose from. Any advice would be much appreciated!

Quote from @Cliff Benner:

From what I see and my experience, it is a bit hard to find one that is going to Cash Flow positively right away. You will have lots of expenses with the formation of a new LLC, lawyer fees, costs to start up payroll for this company, workers comp, new insurances, immediate repairs, etc. But you will be getting cash inflows that may reduce that burden.

You will have to stabilize the turmoil that comes with drastic change, and changes you implement to increase efficiencies. Where as a Turnkey rental has some of those same charges but can be rented and be a bit more passive, depending on the route you take. 

I would suggest working in your new business 6-12 months before you are able to see trends and find who can properly lead so you can step back from operations and focus on growth. 

Cash flow for businesses require more time which usually means higher returns in $ amount, % of CoC Return is more difficult, and keep in mind your time. my rental takes a hour a month and maybe cash flows $100, $100/hour is nice, but took $60k. My Bookkeeping is $65-$70/hour and but cost $1,000 to make it operational. I spend lots of time to automate and duplicate reports in order to save time to increase my efficiencies that help me increase the use of my time. I can't do anything to my rental to increase efficiencies in creating more income until it is vacant or the market decides I can.

Businesses will require workers, that require leading, and that requires more patience and more hard decisions/conversations to make. But can you find additional revenue sources for a business, yes. Sometimes it's not easy or cheap for Real Estate. 

For finding businesses, I use BizbuySell, Crexi, LoopNet, and Facebook. 


Good luck! I have interest in the Laundromat world too so let me know how this goes for you!

I greatly appreciate the response, very insightful. 

Quote from @Maureen McCann:

Hi Ethan...I have the best resource for you.   You need to connect with John Barry.  He has owned and operated 4 laundromats and would serve as an exceptional resource for you as you begin to explore investing in. Here is his contact information: 

[email protected]

Thank you!