Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Erik Nizenkoff

Erik Nizenkoff has started 3 posts and replied 6 times.

Post: Tax Basis for deprecation, but some costs paid in 2nd year?

Erik NizenkoffPosted
  • Investor
  • Watsonville, CA
  • Posts 6
  • Votes 2

@Logan Allec  The tenants were in-place when I purchased.  The 2018 bills are from my real estate lawyer, and from the Environmental Phase I/II.

Post: Tax Basis for deprecation, but some costs paid in 2nd year?

Erik NizenkoffPosted
  • Investor
  • Watsonville, CA
  • Posts 6
  • Votes 2

Hi,  I purchased a commercial property at the end of December 2017.  I wasn't billed for some of my lawyer's fees and inspection fees until 2018, around $20k.  It is my understanding that I can add these to the basis for depreciation.  How does this work since the fees weren't all paid in the year the purchased closed?  Do I calculate the 2017 depreciation on the week and a half that I owned the property, but not include the fees paid in 2018?  Do the fees paid in 2018 start a new clock and they depreciate in 39 years on their own?  Thanks for any advice!

Post: Seller Refusing to provide Phase I ESA

Erik NizenkoffPosted
  • Investor
  • Watsonville, CA
  • Posts 6
  • Votes 2

Just wanted to follow up with how it turned out.  After a couple days of my lawyer battling with the seller, the seller ALLOWED me to have a phase I performed.  I paid for this, then subsequently paid for the Phase II soil sampling.  Everything turned out OK and we closed escrow yesterday. 

My wife and I moved out of our condo in California which we bought in 2014.  We're going to rent it out in the next few weeks.  Does anyone have any advice or methods on how to calculate the improvements value for depreciation?  We originally purchased the property for $319,000.  About 9 months ago another unit in our condo sold for $430,000.  The two units have identical layouts and square footage.  The other unit is upstairs with a ~100 sq ft balcony, where our unit has ~400 sq ft patio making me assume we could sell our unit for a little more.  If I were to put the condo on the market now, I would list for at least $450k-$475k.  Current taxes value the property at $330,344 ($231,240 land/$99,104 improvement) which comes out to 70% land, 30% improvements.  Should I just take 30% of $450,000 which equals $135,000 and use that for my depreciation basis?

Post: Seller Refusing to provide Phase I ESA

Erik NizenkoffPosted
  • Investor
  • Watsonville, CA
  • Posts 6
  • Votes 2

Thanks for the input Joel.  I am consulting my attorney through this process, but just looking for any other input/experience from here.  I do have a copy of a letter from 1995 from the county environmental health department stating that the cleanup is in accordance with all current standards and no further action was required at the time, but they reserve the right to require something different in the future.  

My lender is not requiring a phase I.  My attorney strongly advised it, and the seller agreed to it in the contract.  There is no wording in the reports he has giving me implying it is a phase I, or has ever been considered a phase I.  I told the seller that maybe there was a misunderstanding, so I have since offered to pay for the phase I myself, but the seller is refusing to allow it.

Here is the previous line in our contract: 

"9. BUYER'S INVESTIGATION OF PROPERTY CONDITION: Buyer's Acceptance of the condition of the Property is a contingency of this Agreement, as specified in this paragraph and paragraph 21. Buyer shall have the right, at Buyer's expense, to conduct inspections, investigations, tests, surveys, and other studies ("Inspections"), including the right to inspect for wood destroying pests and organisms. No Inspections shall be made by any governmental building or zoning inspector, or government employee, without Seller's prior written consent. unless required by Law. Property improvements may not be built according to codes or in compliance with current Law, or have had permits issued. Buyer shall, within the time specified in Paragraph 21, complete these Inspections and notify Seller in writing of any items reasonably disapproved. Seller shall make Property available for all Inspections. Buyer shall: keep Property free and clear of liens; indemnify and hold Seller harmless from all liability, claims, demands, damages and costs; and repair all damages arising from Inspections. Buyer shall carry, or Buyer shall require anyone acting on Buyer's behalf to carry, policies of liability. worker's compensation, and other applicable insurance, defending and protecting Seller from liability for any injuries to persons or property occurring during any work done on the Property at Buyer's direction, prior to Close Of Escrow. Seller is advised that certain protections may be afforded Seller by recording a notice of non-responsibility for work done on the Property at Buyer's direction. At Seller's request, Buyer shall give Seller, at no cost, complete copies of all Inspection reports obtained by Buyer concerning the Property. Seller shall have water, gas, and electricity on for Buyer's Inspections, and through the date possession is made available to Buyer."

Must the seller allow me to perform a phase I, and do soil sampling as long as I perform any required repairs?

Post: Seller Refusing to provide Phase I ESA

Erik NizenkoffPosted
  • Investor
  • Watsonville, CA
  • Posts 6
  • Votes 2

Hi,  I've been lurking on the forums for awhile, but this is my first time posting.

I'm currently 14 days into a 60 day escrow on the purchase of a commercial property in California.  This would be our first commercial property, we also own a rental condo.  The property is 1/2 acre with a 2000 sq ft building containing 4 units.  My wife and I have been tenants in one of the buildings for the past 2 years, so we're pretty familiar with the property.  The landlord is a VERY difficult person to deal with, which is part of our reason for buying the building.  

This property was originally built as a gas station/mechanic's shop in the 1930's.  Gas tanks were abandoned in the 1960's.  In 1995, the tanks were filled in place by a reputable company and all required reports were filed with the county's environmental health department.  I have no reason to believe the property is contaminated.

Our landlord/seller is also a licensed real estate broker.  He is representing himself in the sale.  He provided a "Commerical Property Purchase Agreement Receipt For Deposit, And Escrow Instructions" Form from 1998.  A little outdated, but ok... Since seller was representing himself, I hired a real estate attorney to assist me with the purchase.  I figured this was the prudent thing to do.  My attorney reviewed the purchase agreement and made a couple of edits/addendums.  The seller agreed to the addendums, we both signed, and I gave him a check for a deposit made out to the escrow company.

One line item that the seller filled out on his own originally was: "10. [X] ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY: Within ____ Days After Acceptance, Buyer shall be provided a phase one environmental survey report paid for and obtained by [  ] Buyer, [X] Seller. Buyer, within the time specified in paragraph 21, shall provide Seller with written notice of any item disapproved."

My attorney added the addendum: "(i) Buyer has 35 Days after receipt of the environmental survey (pursuant to paragraph 10) to complete any environmental inspection and remove any contingency or disapproval right concerning the environmental condition of the property."

5 Days into escrow, the seller provided a "Residential Property Disclosure Report" he purchased online as well as a copy of the UST closure report.  About 4 days later, I reminded him I needed a phase I environment report that the contract said he would provide because the contract said I had 35 days to review.  He told me the documentation he provided was a phase I and it released me from all liability.  I knew this was not the case and emailed the company that performed the UST closure report and asked if they had ever done a phase one on the property with the seller CC'd.  The company replied back that no, a phase I had never been done by them on this property.  I reply to the email asking for a quote for a phase I.  ($2300, which I find pretty reasonable).  The seller calls me on the phone and tells me that they must have lost the report, everything is OK, talking to them more would "open up a can of worms" etc....

I called up the environmental testing folks and chatted a bit.  They feel that since they did the job, they're pretty confident that everything is OK, but they would still most likely do soil sampling after the phase I to confirm at a cost of $8k-$9k.  I also found this price reasonable.  I had the same conversation with a different company, and they recommended the same testing.

At this point, I'm upset at the seller because he's not paying for the phase I that was agreed upon in the contract.  We really want this guy out of our lives, so my wife and I agree that we'd offer to pay for phase I and soil testing out of our own pockets.  Friday we were having an appraisal done on the property for the bank loan so we were all onsite.  I kept trying to explain to the seller that he did not give us a phase I as agreed upon in our contract.  I concede that maybe there was a misunderstanding, but my wife and I need a phase I to make an educated purchase, so we will pay for it out of our own pockets.  He gets angry and says if we do that the deal is off, and I have 72 hours to think about it.  I tell him I'm not buying without a phase I and he has 72 hours to think about it.  After that, we both walked away angry.  He calls me about an hour later and tries to convince me the reports he provided were OK.  I tell him to call my attorney.  I took a 20-minute walk to cool off and return to voicemails from the seller and my attorney.  Talk to my attorney who said the seller kept talking in circles and tried to explain environmental legal liabilities, my attorney.  My attorney said the conversation was "half confusing and half futile".  I called the seller back and got his voicemail so I left a message for him to contact my attorney and haven't heard from him since.

I'm really angry at this point, since I'm already several thousand dollers into this between appraisails and consulting from my attorney, not to mention the time applying for financing, etc....

We still really want to buy the property, but there's no way we're doing it without the legal protections of a phase I.  Has anyone else had an experience like this?  Any advice?  Since the seller is also acting like a broker, I wonder if there's any ethics issues with a broker trying to prevent a buyer from performing due diligence?