Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Emmanuel Ola

Emmanuel Ola has started 11 posts and replied 34 times.

Quote from @Anderson S.:
Quote from @Emmanuel Ola:

I found a good deal that I really like for $160K, which has excellent cash flow potential. Initially, I was planning for a quick sale and contacted my private money lender for a hard money loan. My plan was to put down 35% while she would cover the remaining 65%.

However, the seller has requested to be in escrow for 45-60 days so that he can complete a 1031 exchange and use the proceeds to buy another house within that period. Given this new information, I'm considering whether it might make more sense to opt for a conventional loan instead of a hard money loan, due to the lower interest rates associated with conventional loans. Alternatively, I could stick with the hard money loan and refinance into a conventional loan later.

I would appreciate any suggestions or advice on this decision.


How did this turn out Emmanuel?


I eventually used a DSCR loan. Will close in few days.

Quote from @Kerry Baird:

I haven’t done this, and what strikes me about your plan is the financing piece.  The first mortgage would be secured against the whole plot of land.  You build the second property and what does the lender do?  Add a mortgage to second position? Pay off first and add a new mortgage covering both properties?  

Now you do the third build…what does the lender do?  Says no due to too many houses on one parcel, as a possibility.  Unless you do them all at one time, you have origination and closing costs on each house…so perhaps you pay up front to split the land.

Obviously, I am not a developer and someone who is may chime in.  I look forward to answers rather than my musings.  


Thanks so much for your input. We have the same concerns and I am hoping we can get more responses from the veterans here. Thanks again. 

Quote from @Robin Simon:

More recent California DSCR Loans and California Hard Money Loans funded by Easy Street Capital!

💵Just Funded💵🧊California BRRRR Loans🧊
$848,810 Hard Money Loan for the first steps of the BRRRR Method (Buy/Rehab/Rent/Refinance/Repeat) on a duplex in Lawndale, California! Experienced Real Estate Pros lock in hard money for a light rehab of both units - should be a quick BRRRR!

💵Just Funded💵🛠️California Fix And Flip Loans🛠️
$104,000 Hard Money Loan for a fix and flip investment in Bakersfield, California! This investor with great cash reserves locks in funding for the purchase of this 1912-vintage SFR (quick close) and will self-finance the renovation!

đź’µJust Fundedđź’µ
$320,250 Cash-Out Refinance DSCR Loan on a Single Family Rental in Ridgecrest, California via @Zach Edelman! A great BRRRR execution - borrower secures 75% cash-out refinancing within 7 months of purchase - rented & cash flowing! Ready 2 Repeat!


 Hello Robin,

Let's connect please. Thanks

Hello BigPocketers,

I’m seeking advice on the best way to approach this situation. I recently purchased a 0.42-acre piece of land for $90K. Directly across from it is a vacant 8,000 sqft lot listed for $75K. Considering the high prices of other lots in the area, many have said I got a great deal.

The land I bought has a 2-bedroom, 1-bath house that was listed as 550 sqft but is actually 750 sqft; the records just weren't updated with the city. Fortunately, the city has given me permission to rehabilitate the house, which I plan to use as an Airbnb. My wife and I already have two new constructions we rent out on Airbnb, netting us over $4K monthly after expenses. We believe rehabbing this house could be a great addition to our portfolio.

I’ve consulted several architects who’ve indicated that I could potentially build up to seven 1,250 sqft homes on the lot. My plan is to use all seven buildings as short-term rentals (Airbnb). However, if short-term rentals are no longer allowed or become less viable, I’m prepared to switch to long-term rentals.

Funding the entire construction at once is a challenge, so I'm exploring the best strategy. I've found a reputable builder who quoted $110K to rehab the burnt house, including expanding it to 1,200 sqft. The comps for a 1,200 sqft house in this area range from $250K to $300K, which would give me a minimum of 25% ARV after rehabbing the house. I've also been pre-approved for a $125K HELOC against my current residence, which I plan to use for the rehab and landscaping. My idea is to refinance after the rehab, use the proceeds to build the second house, and repeat the process until all seven homes are completed. Essentially, this follows the BRRRR (Buy, Rehab, Rent, Refinance, Repeat) method, but with the twist of continually developing more homes on the same piece of land.

Do you think this strategy makes sense? I’ve considered a construction loan to build everything at once, but the stringent conditions and potential delays make me hesitant, especially since this would be my first time seeking such a loan.

I would appreciate any advice on the best way to make this work. Should I proceed with the HELOC and refinancing strategy, or is there a better approach?

Thanks!

Quote from @Russell Brazil:
Quote from @Emmanuel Ola:
Quote from @Dan H.:

In CA the seller is required to disclose known material issues which this qualifies.  The due will be time/effort collecting.  If your issue is the $2k, it is unlikely to be worth pursuing. Maybe at $10k it would be worth pursuing in small claims court.    It has to be much higher than $10k to be worthy of getting a lawyer to pursue (assuming you do not have a friend as a lawyer) as it likely will be $5k minimum in legal fees.

2 decades ago I had a $45k non disclosure issue ($45k two decades ago was a lot more than $45k today) in San Diego.  I caught it before closing which minimized my damages. I had minimal damages because I had not sold anything to acquire.  The attorney I consulted felt if I had closed then found the issue that I should collect full cost of the non-disclosure.  Because I caught it when both parties could walk, my damages was inspection, appraisal, etc.   I was given choice of continuing with purchase with discount of 25% of the cost of non disclosure ($11k) or I could walk and seller would pay my damages (less than 2 thousand).  I continued with the purchase.  

I suspect your damages will not be worth much pursuit, but maybe a letter to seller and seller’s RE broker indicating the issue might result in some recovery.  Small claims would be next level of pursuit.   I would not hire a lawyer unless your damages exceed $20k.

Good luck


 Thanks for your response. You're right about the amount not worth pursuing in court. I'm just pissed with the seller's agent for not disclosing and wish they can be punished for being dishonest. 


 Its not the sellers agent you should be passed with. It wasn't their job to discover code violations on the property. The government isn't mailing them copies of the violations.

Assuming these items could have been discovered in a permit/violation search, it's actually your buyers agent, and the title company you should be upset with. Title should have cleared any existing violations before closing. And your buyers agent should make it a practice to do a permit search on a buy side transaction.


 I agree. Thanks

Quote from @Dan H.:

In CA the seller is required to disclose known material issues which this qualifies.  The due will be time/effort collecting.  If your issue is the $2k, it is unlikely to be worth pursuing. Maybe at $10k it would be worth pursuing in small claims court.    It has to be much higher than $10k to be worthy of getting a lawyer to pursue (assuming you do not have a friend as a lawyer) as it likely will be $5k minimum in legal fees.

2 decades ago I had a $45k non disclosure issue ($45k two decades ago was a lot more than $45k today) in San Diego.  I caught it before closing which minimized my damages. I had minimal damages because I had not sold anything to acquire.  The attorney I consulted felt if I had closed then found the issue that I should collect full cost of the non-disclosure.  Because I caught it when both parties could walk, my damages was inspection, appraisal, etc.   I was given choice of continuing with purchase with discount of 25% of the cost of non disclosure ($11k) or I could walk and seller would pay my damages (less than 2 thousand).  I continued with the purchase.  

I suspect your damages will not be worth much pursuit, but maybe a letter to seller and seller’s RE broker indicating the issue might result in some recovery.  Small claims would be next level of pursuit.   I would not hire a lawyer unless your damages exceed $20k.

Good luck


 Thanks for your response. You're right about the amount not worth pursuing in court. I'm just pissed with the seller's agent for not disclosing and wish they can be punished for being dishonest. 

Quote from @Russell Brazil:
Quote from @Emmanuel Ola:
Quote from @Russell Brazil:
Quote from @Emmanuel Ola:
Quote from @Russell Brazil:

1) What state are you in? Many states operate under Caveat Emptor and have no disclosure requirements.

2) These are probably not latent, or hidden, as a most jurisdictions have online permit and violation searches you can conduct. 

I am in California. The property is in California as well. Thanks for responding



 Question C15 on the California disclosure form asks if there are any violations on the property (at the time the form was filled out)

What is checked on the form you received? 

They checked NO, as shown in the snapshot below.



 I may have misunderstood something.

Are you currently under contract? If so, the title attorney is going to clear those violations.


No. I'm not under contract. I closed on the house already. I'm only showing you what the seller ticked on C-15 in the disclosure that we both signed. 

Quote from @Russell Brazil:
Quote from @Emmanuel Ola:
Quote from @Russell Brazil:

1) What state are you in? Many states operate under Caveat Emptor and have no disclosure requirements.

2) These are probably not latent, or hidden, as a most jurisdictions have online permit and violation searches you can conduct. 

I am in California. The property is in California as well. Thanks for responding



 Question C15 on the California disclosure form asks if there are any violations on the property (at the time the form was filled out)

What is checked on the form you received? 

They checked NO, as shown in the snapshot below.


Quote from @Russell Brazil:

1) What state are you in? Many states operate under Caveat Emptor and have no disclosure requirements.

2) These are probably not latent, or hidden, as a most jurisdictions have online permit and violation searches you can conduct. 

They checked NO, as shown in the snapshot below.

Quote from @Russell Brazil:

1) What state are you in? Many states operate under Caveat Emptor and have no disclosure requirements.

2) These are probably not latent, or hidden, as a most jurisdictions have online permit and violation searches you can conduct. 

I am in California. The property is in California as well. Thanks for responding