Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Emily Vatistas

Emily Vatistas has started 1 posts and replied 1 times.

My boyfriend’s potential landlord says in the lease agreement that he is not allowed to obtain renter’s insurance and the landlord will not be held responsible. Any reason? This is why it says specifically: “Tenant agrees not to obtain renter’s insurance, at Tenant’s expense, to insurance expense theft, property damage/loss, personal injury and other normal insurable risks that expose tenant to financial liability. Landlord shall not
be responsible for any of Tenant’s personal property that is lost, stolen, damaged or destroyed, regardless of the cause; Tenant hereby assumes the risk of all said losses”.This seems super suspicious. How would this benefit the landlord in any way?