Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Elliott D.

Elliott D. has started 2 posts and replied 3 times.

Post: What is your quick and simple way to estimate property insurance?

Elliott D.Posted
  • Huntington Beach, CA
  • Posts 3
  • Votes 0

I'm looking for a way to estimate property insurance costs on out of state rental properties. I need a method that doesn't require me to contact and get an official quote from an insurance company, but rather I need quick basic conservative numbers that I can plug into spreadsheets for quick general comparisons.

What are your methods for this?

Post: Large insurance claims and your lenders involvement in your case

Elliott D.Posted
  • Huntington Beach, CA
  • Posts 3
  • Votes 0

Thank you very much for you responses, I realize I've assumed things that were never clearly stated about this subject.

The lender wanting you to get your claim payed out is not the same thing as them actually going to court for you.

Post: Large insurance claims and your lenders involvement in your case

Elliott D.Posted
  • Huntington Beach, CA
  • Posts 3
  • Votes 0

I need help understanding this idea that your lender will help you collect on insurance claims if you have a high outstanding loan balance.

In this scenario, if you have a high loan balance on a property, and your property gets largely destroyed or damaged, you then have to collect on a HUGE insurance claim. I have heard from mainly two popular real estate educators, Robert Kiyosaki and Jason Hartman, that it is to your advantage to have a high loan balance as opposed to a paid off property.

a quote from Jason Hartman:

On the contrary, it has been explained to me by an IRS attorney who has handled related cases before that this is not true, that in reality the lender has no skin in this insurance claim and will simply expect you to pay the mortgage regardless of whether or not your property is intact. This is because the loan is an agreement between owner and lender and they don't care if your property is destroyed, they still expect you to pay that mortgage no matter what.

what is really going on here? in your experience, which one of these interpretations is correct?