I am very surprised that this topic is so two-sided but am grateful for all the opinions shared thus far.
From the folks that don't like investing out of state, the primary reason appears to be the higher risk involved. The arguments for not investing OOS include the inability to manage the property hands-on or see it regularly.
For people that have success investing OOS, I can see that they leverage a good team and know the market well to mitigate the above risks.
So then I ask - if real estate is a game all about risk management, and strategies have been identified to reduce that risk, why is OOS investing still considered too risky? Build a good team, assess the market well, and run the numbers correctly. Is this not what a savvy investor would do when investing locally?
Yes this is incredibly simplified, but my opinion is that whenever you limit yourself to one geographic area, your opportunities are severely limited as well.