Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Dylan NA

Dylan NA has started 5 posts and replied 31 times.

Post: Is it Bad to LowBall on Houses?

Dylan NAPosted
  • Calgary, Alberta
  • Posts 31
  • Votes 0
Originally posted by @Christopher Brainard:

@Dylan NA

Asking for a 10% discount (If the house is priced at FMV) is hardly low-balling and limits your exit options on the house. I'd be sending (more) lower offers and try to identify motivated sellers that are willing to accept less to increase your margins. There was a topic somewhere where people were posting what their offer acceptance rates were. If you're seeing a 30% acceptance rate, you're probably offering too much.

Additionally, in this particular example above, you also need to account for repairs, vacancy, CapEx, utilities, etc, in your costs, so your take home is going to be less than you are expecting. Landlord expenses always run more than you think, when you're first starting out.

-Christopher

Very true, in the example above the seller got back to me and he said he would accept 230,000, so im sure i could close at 225,000. Now i asked about the suite being legal and it is not. The seller was renting the house to a family for 1,500 dollars plus utilities. Which isnt that bad, but then the renter was renting the illegal suite to other people and charging 750 dollars, im like thats sooooo illegal lolol. Thats y i always use property manager, because 90% of landlords are asking to be sued because they dont know about the legal side of being a landlord. 1,500 plus they pay utilities might be tough for me to make cashflow. I would need 800 in mortgage, 200 in tax, 100 in insurance. Thats 1,100 right there, thats 400 in monthly cash flow, minus 50% because stuff is always more than what it seems, i would basically be breaking even, stupid

Post: Is it Bad to LowBall on Houses?

Dylan NAPosted
  • Calgary, Alberta
  • Posts 31
  • Votes 0

So lets be honest, majority of houses that are sold on real estate websites, are either overpriced or just simply not worth their value. am curious is it bad to constantly low ball on prices for houses? For example, I asked a seller, if he would take 225,000 on his 250,000 property. Now if he does sell that is awesome, I just got a very very good deal, if he doesn't whatever. Is this the strategy I should typically use when buying houses? I would never ever offer someone the actual price they want on a house, I would always low ball around 20-25,000. In order to do well in real estate we need to get very very good deals on the houses we buy. If I tell the person I will buy there house instantly for 225,000 and its worth 250,000 maybe 7/10 people wouldn't do the deal, but theres lots of people who aren't patient and would accept the deal.
What is your opinion on low balling every house offer, until you find a deal you like. Do most of you lowball? im curious to know.

As for the property I am looking at its going for 250,000. It has 2 bedrooms upstairs and a suite downstairs with 2 bedrooms, I asked if the suite in the basement is legal too btw. So I could charge 1,300 dollars for the upstairs and 1,300 for the the basement. That leaves me with 2,600 gross income a month. Lets assume 400 dollars in total bills, 200 dollars for property tax, and 100 for house insurance.

That's 700 dollars in expenses, now lets assume I paid 250,000 instead of 225,000. My mortgage would cost me:

250,000 x 20% downpayment= 200,000 mortgage a month= 980 dollars

now lets assume I got it with 225,000 x 20%= 180,000 mortage= 880 dollars a month

Total expenses now would be: 880 dollars a month, + 400 dollars, 200 dollars, and 100 dollars= 1580 dollars. plus 225 dollars for property manager= 1,805 dollars for my total expenses.

So I would make 800 dollars a month net. 

What do you guys think of my idea to constantly low ball on prices?

Post: Buying and renting out a Single Family home

Dylan NAPosted
  • Calgary, Alberta
  • Posts 31
  • Votes 0
Originally posted by @Luka Milicevic:

You are cash flowing so can't complain about that. It depends what your goal ROI is on your money. Only you can answer that question.

In terms of cash flow, don't forget the 50% rule! 50% of your cash flow will go to non debt related exp: repairs, vacancy, and capital expenditure, etc. It won't happen every month but over time you can expect this to be a good estimate.

Also leave room for property management. Even though you're not using it now, in the future you might want to!

As for books. Listen to the bigger pockets podcast. On the last part they ask everyone what their favorite book is.

Good luck!

 If i did get a property manager to

manage it, would i still have positive cash flow? what do u think? i would like to have all property managers so i can keep working fulltime

Post: Buying and renting out a Single Family home

Dylan NAPosted
  • Calgary, Alberta
  • Posts 31
  • Votes 0

Got another question for you guys at bigger pockets:)

Also since I am a beginner, I went on the weekend to chapters and looked at various real estate investing books, if anyone has any good suggestions that could really help me out, please refer me to books, I love reading and learning. With that in mind I have a question.

So I have found a nice single family home,  that I am considering buying. It is currently listed at 227,000, but I know for a fact I can low ball and get them down to around 210,000 or so.

It is in a very good location, close to sports coliseum and LRT station. Has 3 bedrooms and 2 bathroom, total sq footage is 1300. Heres the good thing, built in 1994. So its realitvely new.

The monthly mortgage is 800 dollars, which isn't bad in my opinion.

I plan on renting the whole house out for 1,600 plus they pay utilities, which I think is a very very good price. I looked at other houses in the area being rented out and they range from 1,500 to 1,800 dollars.

So I would only have to pay the mortgage each money as well as property tax and house insurance. House insurance is only 100 a month and property tax 150 a month.

So total expenses is 1050 dollars. I get 1,600 dollars. So I should make around 550 dollars a month cash flow. Even if I make 400 dollars a month extra I would be happy:). Just looking to get my first house no matter what I have to do.

Also I do work as a 4th year electrician so even if something goes wrong like vacancy I make 4,000 dollars every 2 weeks, so a lousy 800 a month in mortgage wont kill me. What is your opinion on this? Do my expenses add up, is it a worth while deal, or should I get a duplex instead or a fourplex?

This deal seems better for me just because I already have 40,000 dollars which is the downpayment needed, in the bank just sitting there right now

Post: Full Duplex appartment, Im attempting to buy it

Dylan NAPosted
  • Calgary, Alberta
  • Posts 31
  • Votes 0

anyone else?

Post: Which Option is better?

Dylan NAPosted
  • Calgary, Alberta
  • Posts 31
  • Votes 0
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

Zoning in Edmonton doesn't allow secondary suites in duplexes, ever. So don't count on income from the basements of the duplexes in your cost analysis as that income will literally disappear overnight when the city comes knocking.

Also ALL your numbers are way too conservative. $600 for bills across ten bedrooms and 5% total rents to a property manager? In your dreams. 

I've read all your posts in this thread and the last one, and everything you say makes me very nervous that you're not fully educated enough. I would suggest doing more research and consider taking some paid courses before diving into this. 

Real estate is an active investment not a passive one as you seem to think. Even if you do want to use a property manager.

I would suggest you look at investing in index funds if you want passive income or consider being a money partner in a joint venture with someone very knowledgeable in real estate investing in Edmonton. 

 single family houses are 10% for property manager, duplexes are around 5%, i have looked at 5 different property managers so far and those were the averages. Also i made a mistake, it says side by side duplex registered as condominim row housing by the city of edmonton. 4 individual suites with 10 bedrooms altogether. Is this bad? that its registered as a condominium row housing? im a beginner thats why i need your help:) It says a side by side duplex. As for bills lets say be verg aggressive than and say 300 for water, 350 for gas, 350 for power. Thats 1,000 in bills, even so i still would have a capital gain

Post: Which Option is better?

Dylan NAPosted
  • Calgary, Alberta
  • Posts 31
  • Votes 0
Originally posted by @Denis S.:

Hey Dylan,

Agus is right on being pre-qualified. You would want to know how much you can qualify and then set up a plan because in your case if you plan correctly you can position yourself to buy more property later without putting all your money into one house. Even if you were to stick to one house for now I think it's good to keep your options open because  a)you never know when you'll need some liquidity for upgrades and other house expenses b) with the current market in alberta a great opportunity can come along and you want to have the financing means and the cash to close on it if you want. Plus with money being relatively cheap now to borrow it makes more sense to leverage a little more imo.

If you need help pre-qualifying message me I can help you out.

Cheers,

Denis

 Ya im already prequalified for 600,000 dollar mortgage, so thats enough for what i want to buy. I want to buy a full duplex for 400,000-600,000. Single family home isnt what i want to do anymore, same with half duplex. I found a full duplex, it has 4 suites and 10 bedrooms throughout plus 6 bathrooms, so i was thinking of buying that, its going for 650,000. So i could put a 130,000 downpayment on it and still have 20,000 in the bank plus a good job still. I could get 6,000 altogether for each suite each month, mortgage would cost me 2,400 plus 600 in bills, 500 in taxes and insurance a month probaly, and 300 for property manager, Now thats 3800 altogether in expenses and i was hard on myself for the bills, taxes and insurance. So i would net around 2,200 a month, lets be extremely conservative and say 1,500 a month. That is pretty damn good in my opinion, and on top of that other people are paying the mortgage on the duplex so in 20 years it will be 100% paid off

Post: Which Option is better?

Dylan NAPosted
  • Calgary, Alberta
  • Posts 31
  • Votes 0
Originally posted by @David Faulkner:

Nothing at all wrong with wanting completely passive income ... however, I don't know of any investors (including me) that just "sit back and rake in the cash" all the time with this type of investment even (or especially) with a PM, and I've been doing this for over 12 years ... you have to manage your property manager to make sure they are not ripping you off or doing something stupid on your behalf ... and those times when they do (and don't kid yourself, they will), you will need to step in to clean up the mess and sometimes fire them and hire a new PM. Also, if you've never invested hands-on before, you might not even know how to spot early on if a PM is messing up or how to fix it if they do ... it can be a pain and a lot of work, but this is the cost of doing business. This cost may or may not be worth it to you, and either way is fine, but you should go in with eyes wide open and realistic expectations. If you decide ahead of time it is not worth it for you, and there is nothing wrong with that, then I advise exploring the more passive investment vehicles already mentioned. For me, it is worth it; there is no greater joy in the world to me than to take an old beater of a house, turn it into something great with my own 2 hands, and transform it into a nice home for a nice family ... I profit all along the way, of course, but it is not all about the money. I've been doing this for over 12 years.

One last comment: you hate your current electrician job and want to quit, I get it, but make sure that you are truly running towards something, and not just running away from something ... been there, done that, and the grass is not always greener on the other side of the fence, just a different shade of brown. Again, I don't have the answers for you, only suggest the questions to ask ... I'm confident that if you ask yourself the right questions then you will find the right answers for you, regardless of whether or not Real Estate Investment is the path you choose.

 I have looked and lots of people simply just get a direct deposit from the property manager each month, yes i understand some may rip you off, but thats why i have did my research on all the different types in edmonton and i have found a few who have good rates, and the comments and reviews from other investors are good as well. And in all honestly as long as i am making some sort of passive income i will be extremely happy, because on top of positive capital gain, the renters are paying my mortgage monthly, in 20 years after the mortgage is done i own the duplex now and can probaly sell it, if its worth 650,000 i have no doubt in 20 yrs it be over 800-900,000, either way im making money:) But i gott do it now and stop procrasinating. I feel like im wasting my time, im already 22 yrs old and have no rentals, maybe im being too hard on myself. Also do u work a full time job too? like 100 hours every 2 weeks or only flip houses. I would love to flip houses, but i cant when im working 100 hours every 2 weeks. I use my job to create the wealth for the property than have a manager take over and do everything else. 

If im making 2,000 a month in total savings from my job after all expenses than when i buy my first rental, all make say at the very very low 1,500, after everything is all said and done, now i am making 3,500 in savings, so my next property wont take as long for me to save till. Than i buy another one and get another 1,500 and my new savibgs is 5,000 and just keep doing that ya?

Post: Full Duplex appartment, Im attempting to buy it

Dylan NAPosted
  • Calgary, Alberta
  • Posts 31
  • Votes 0
Originally posted by @Michael Boyer:

Dylan,

I have actually enjoyed watching your posts evolve and the learning curve.. You have  advanced from that first post in terms of strategy and I a sure after all the feedback comes in on this one, you will advance even further..

Before everyone gets into the numbers, properties and details, are you thinking about managing them yourself (I see management mentioned above), especially if you live next door? 

That is one threshold issue you might look at as it would improve your margin (no mgt fee) and even control your costs more closely (be it maintenance, hustling on turnarounds and vacancies, etc). The fact you are in the trades (electrician/painter) also makes me think you may have a very useful skill set to apply to the property side of landlording and could work on the people side through self study.

Best of Luck

 Thx michael, its people like you who i am learning from so i really appreciate all the help. And yes i was thinking about using a property manager, here is why i want to: Before i was going to buy a single family, with single family property manager charges 10%. With a duplex though they only charge 4-5%:))) So if my gross income is 7,000 from the 4 suites/bedrooms than property manager takes 350 dollars, I am 110% okay with that, they have experience and know what they are doing, they also have the tools to make sure my duplex has all 4 suites filled with renters who are on 2 year lease agreements:) They also know all the legal details and know everything there is too about real estate, i on the other hand and am inexperienced, i am okay with that and willing to learn, but in my opinion 350 dollars is okay to give up for what they offer. As long as i make even 500 dollars in passive capital all be happy, but i have a feeling all make closer to 2,500 dollars to 3,000

Post: Which Option is better?

Dylan NAPosted
  • Calgary, Alberta
  • Posts 31
  • Votes 0
Originally posted by @Jassem A.:

Be careful with renting rooms. Zoning usually only allows up to 3 unrelated people per household.  I would look into buying an apartment building or multiple single family homes with that kind of money.  I'd imagine Canada is much more expensive than the US though in general.  You could look into buying cheaper properties with cash that are in need of repairs in order to save some money.

 Ya im looking into full duplexes now. I found one with 4 different suites, and a total of 10 bedrooms so im happy