Quote from @Michael Plaks:
Quote from @Wayne C.:
@John P.
To expand the discussion, for those among us who are evaluating funds to invest in, but want to avoid the tax preparation cost of multiple state tax returns, the following article talks about the benefit of a private equity fund structured as a REIT. Per the author, the REIT structure eliminates the need for multiple state tax filings at the investor level, as well as eliminating UBTI.
Yes, you will be receiving dividends instead of K-1, so no state reporting hassle. However, this is the tail wagging the dog. When evaluating investments, I always preach these priorities:
1. Does this investment fit my overall business plan?
2. How profitable is this investment?
3. What are the risks of this investment?
4. Tax considerations
I will always disagree with investors prioritizing #4 above the other, more important, criteria.
Also, I'm confused with you mentioning UBTI. If you're concerned about UBTI, then you must be considering investing via your self-directed retirement accounts. But SDIRAs are not subject to the state reporting requirements that we're discussing here. If you're investing via SDIRA, you should not worry about states, and this particular advantage of REITs (no state reporting) is irrelevant.
Thank you, Michael. I'm not able to strictly prioritize your criteria in that order for every investment. Surely, any investment must fit one's plan, and risks can be logically evaluated, but a certain profit cannot be accurately calculated..it's always a gamble in real estate. It just seems to me that the cost of tax compliance can be a high priority, especially for a likely 10 year hold QOF. Engaging a tax pro year after year for multi-state returns has the same impact on profit as the fees that are charged by the fund sponsor.
Regarding UBTI, you are correct that it is only a concern within a SDIRA investment. I only mentioned it because it was mentioned in the article I linked to, and has been a topic of discussion in this forum.