Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: David Schach

David Schach has started 12 posts and replied 53 times.

Originally posted by @Kris Scott:

Hi all,

I live in California but looking to buy an apartment with a 20% down in Vegas.

Ultimately, I'd like to rent this place out to people on VRBO/Airbnb.

Any tips or advice would be greatly appreciated as I don't want to run into any legal trouble.

Thank you!

 I have done a little bit of digging in LV for vrbo figures and its a mixed bag. You're vacancy rates will be a compete unknown in your calculations, so go VERY conservative, assume you are empty 50% of the time. Second, the place will get trashed at various points along the way from party people etc. Take into account higher than average repairs as well. Also factor in PM fees as well as cost to clean and refresh after every guest visit. These figures usually come out on par with just getting a standard lease at less money with fewer man hours involved. IF you find otherwise please let me know. Very curious if this can pencil out, especially on 20% down with financing. All cash is another story.

Post: Michigan Investors take a look

David SchachPosted
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 39

Interesting article about population trends. I was shocked to read that 47 of 83 counties had declining population. And doesnt look good in the long run either.

http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2015/03/26/census-population/70463986/

Post: Why no mention of appraisers?

David SchachPosted
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 39
Originally posted by @Greg H.:

@David Schach

Are you willing to pay $400-600 for every potential deal ? If so , the appraiser will be getting all the gold

 good point. last time i paid an appraiser it was closer to $200. but i think dropping $600 and not getting a deal done would be wasting time and money.

Post: Why no mention of appraisers?

David SchachPosted
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 39

I read a lot of posts here about deals and buying and selling etc. And most people seem to look at their team as Broker/agent, GC, broker/lender, equity partners, PM, maybe a title company is discussed now and then. But no one ever talks about finding a great appraiser to give you accurate ARV #s etc. Why is this?

Right now, I am thinking that finding a good appraiser to evaluate my deals could be worth its weight in gold. At the end of the day its the appraised value that matters, not the BPO or someones guess etc...

thoughts?

Originally posted by @J Scott:
Originally posted by :

@J ScottI see your answers...and take them to what I consider the real answer to all of the questions..and what rally decides what/where the risk is in any scenario put in front of you. It comes down to, at least it does to me, not in the percieved risks going in...but the real risks coming out. The difference? It's what defines them as risks...the "risk controls" eah individual REI has at their disposal, and impliments.

I honestly and sincerely have absolutely no idea what you're trying to say above.  But, this is my point:

Mathematically speaking, increasing leverage increases risk of insolvency.

It's that simple.  There is no logical argument against it.

Now, if you don't consider insolvency a risk, that's a separate discussion.  Or if you want to argue that not having leverage provides some risk, that's certainly true as well (I noted them in a previous post).  But, to those who have an issue with leverage, the risk of insolvency is probably the heart of their concerns.

Yeah, that is the key point that is being missed in some of the discussion. Leverage is great to get moving and all, but at some point you can easily be over leveraged and insolvent if 2008/09 comes back. What happens when the rental market takes a nose dive and rents drop 20% or you have extended vacancies etc. I guess for me, the real issue is how much can I leverage (ie how high can my debt payment be) versus what I pencil in as worst case scenario for rents and rental loss, plus all the related costs of ownership. If at my most leveraged point I can ride out the worse combination of all factors than I am okay. BUT, if under the worse case scenario I am going to tread into late payments and foreclosure then I need to either increase my capital in the bank or purchase with more cash in. Joe has a nice strategy on paper, just need to make it work in the real world, where every market is different. For example that would NEVER work in SF Bay Area where at 75% LTV nothing will cash flow.

Post: The argument for investing in Detroit's $500 houses

David SchachPosted
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 39

to me, investing in $500 houses in Detroit is all about playing the LOOOONG game. you are buying dirt, hoping that something reemerges from the ashes.

Post: Las Vegas Wholesalers

David SchachPosted
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 39

Are there any las vegas wholesalers who understand MFR or at least 4 unit buildings at the smallest. Looking to network with a few people and get a first hand view on whats happening in the market right now.

 @Adam Hershman:

 I get what the point is, the more properties you have, the more cash flow coming in and in addition the more property you are paying off, my biggest issue is debt risk. It seems no one minds going into debt at an astounding rate for long periods of time to accomplish this, I would feel much better reducing my debt exposure for a smaller gain, because in my opinion the additional gain is not worth the additional debt.

 And there in lies the rub. Its all about the individual and what they are comfortable with in terms of risk exposure. But you arent arguing that you can achieve X without leverage faster than someone else can achieve X with leverage. What you are arguing is that it takes more risk to speed up the process. And everyone agrees with you. The american way is to get rich quick remember, and then default and make someone else clean up the mess. Or win the lottery, which ever comes first.

 @Adam Hershman:

 Adam,

what i think you are missing and what you eluded to is 100% cash equity vs something other than 100% cash equity to start building a real estate portfolio. 

If you only have X dollars to start with how do you  grow your portfolio to increase your cash flow? You either buy 1 property and MAX out cash flow or you buy as many you can given underwriting guidelines.

And yes, 100% cash ownership of a house will always cash flow better than 20% equity and 30% better than 20 and so on. Just forget about the value of these house for a minute, just assume you can borrow up to 10 SFRs, would you rather have 5 or 10? or 1 or 10? 

Take all the money you can get if you are cash flow positive on each property after expenses and debt service. Use your cash reserves to weather a storm or whatever. And remember you now have 10 people paying off 10 mortgages instead of 5 people or 0 people. Make someone else work a W2 job to pay off your debt.

Originally posted by @Account Closed:

@David Schach

when valuing apartment buildings, cap rates are calculated using NOI, not gross rents.

Cap Rate = NOI / Sales Price

 thanks for that clarification.