Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: David Ogas

David Ogas has started 1 posts and replied 2 times.

Quote from @James Hamling:
Quote from @David Ogas:

Hello Everyone:

At this point, I am a prospective investor who is looking to get into multifamily real estate. In short, I'm in the research phase of my development and in doing so, I've encountered several strategies for acquiring real estate and developing a portfolio.

Whether it be 20% down and then later, utilizing another 20% down to buy more properties, or by utilizing the BRRR method, the thing that I can't seem to understand is how anyone is profiting if they're constantly owing money to the bank, without paying off the mortgage in full from the first property?

On the surface, it appears that you're only making partial payments on one property, and then moving on to the next property by adding another mortgage that you're still responsible to pay for with interest. It would seem that if you're always in the red, that at some point, you could get yourself into a lot trouble with the bank or potentially ruin your credit.  

In short, what's the point that I'm missing?


 It's a 2 part process. 

Part 1, get all the PERFORMING debt one can. Or that meet's one's end goal.    Keyword PERFORMING debt. 

Part 2, "Kill the Bank!". This is when one flips the switch from growing cash-flow, to focusing on debt paydown. Or maybe cash-flow is so fantastic that one just sit's back and let's it coast. 

Remember that rents from month 1 are paying down your debt. Think about that, someone else is paying off your debt, and putting some into your equity piggy-bank, every month. 

If your 65, yeah it's hard to see much benefit to starting at 65 because it's a time-play. If your with time to do 20-30yrs, it's a no-brainer. You pay once, for something that will keep paying you for eternity. It's a math game. 


Hello Everyone:

At this point, I am a prospective investor who is looking to get into multifamily real estate. In short, I'm in the research phase of my development and in doing so, I've encountered several strategies for acquiring real estate and developing a portfolio.

Whether it be 20% down and then later, utilizing another 20% down to buy more properties, or by utilizing the BRRR method, the thing that I can't seem to understand is how anyone is profiting if they're constantly owing money to the bank, without paying off the mortgage in full from the first property?

On the surface, it appears that you're only making partial payments on one property, and then moving on to the next property by adding another mortgage that you're still responsible to pay for with interest. It would seem that if you're always in the red, that at some point, you could get yourself into a lot trouble with the bank or potentially ruin your credit.  

In short, what's the point that I'm missing?